West Ham "Red" (1 Viewer)

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
Surely no one can agree that's a red?

I've seen people arguing it should be a yellow, i.e having intent, so if that was true, should be a red.

Absolute joke this VAR. Rules open to interpretation, which isn't the point.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Up there with the worst refereeing decisions I've ever seen ..I mean we can all blame VAR but ultimately the referee made the decision .

I think they need to start bringing in suspensions/fines etc for refs because it's a full time job and if you fuck things up so badly where's your accountability
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
Absolutely pathetic. Yellow at the worst and even that would have been quite harsh.

If it's a yellow, it means he meant it, which is a red.

It's like being fouled in the box and a goal kick is awarded. It's either a corner or penalty.
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
No it doesn't. If he meant it then it's 100% a red. It could have been viewed as reckless, which while being accidental, is still a cautionable offence.

That makes sense in fairness, but regardless he kicked the ball for God's sake 🤦‍♂️🤣 I don't see what else he was meant to do, slow mo didn't help the cause.
 

skyblue1991

Well-Known Member
Never a red in a millions years, what is the player supposed to do with his foot?

I can understand if VAR gave the decision because the ref doesnt have a clue so essentially blameless.

But for the ref to go to the screen, watch over and over and then give it a red is shocking!

Sent from my I3113 using Tapatalk
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top