BACK ON TOPIC
This is an important and highly valuable point. Just why is it that the CET is allowing itself to be used as a lever to pressurise the relevant parties today when the club is actually in the hands of the administrator
As the CET is being contacted to spout this stuff is there anybody there who has the wit to say something like;
"Oh, and while you're on the phone could you shed some light on why the Council had to bail out the club in the first place AND what is your recollection of the original rental agreement?
These are questions that the good citizens of Cov deserve to have answered on their behalf. After all it was their council tax that was used to help build the god forsaken Ricoh in the first place! WHy was this necessary?
Isn't it a bit rich of someone who now berates the council over legal bills to not provide answers to these questions?
You cannot and should not be allowed to have it both ways.:welcome:
:guitar2:
Interesting comment in the C.E.T. advising again for all parties to get around the table and talk, it's a shame you wasn't so advisory in the early years when you were part of the Richardson board which sold HR for a song, left us in the lurch regard a football ground, resulting in a ground being built for almost double the cost of any other similar ground the results of such decisions contributes to the mess we are in today. Perhaps you could ignore the confidentiallity agreements set in those days and enlighten us mear supporters why such ridiculous decisions by so called business men were made and what happened to the money.
