Are you so dumb, you are not able to directly answer a question?
Do you refer to everyone by their religion?
We should not let this go, the game is corrupt to the core (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Eakin's_teaboy
- Start date
Are you so dumb, you are not able to directly answer a question?
Do you refer to everyone by their religion?
skybluejelly
Well-Known Member
K
Sent from my CPH2025 using Tapatalk
Sent from my CPH2025 using Tapatalk
skybluejelly
Well-Known Member
Sent from my CPH2025 using Tapatalk
SkyBlueAussie
Well-Known Member
Trust went out the window. Nobody believes anymore.
"The Day The Music Died"
Last edited:
It's not just this it's a job creation exercise!!
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Really would have been one of the greatest FA Cup moments of all time, and it's not even an exaggeration to say that.
SkyBlueAussie
Well-Known Member
Is it Offside when the player begins to kick the ball, or when it leaves his foot. Because O'Hare dinks it up in the air. By the time it leaves his foot then Wright is onside.
Robinshio
Well-Known Member
it is when he first kicks the ball, which is mad - imagine a player balancing the ball on his foot for 2 seconds and then flicking it - a rule made for VAR
messiahrobins
Well-Known Member
Is that a crime lmao
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Not clear in the laws
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
you don't half talk some utter shite
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
not according to VAR today
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
They get to choose from 3 frames they used the first for both the second and third haji was on side I’ll bet
If they have the choice of 3 frames they should look at them all and take the decision based on what at least 2 out of 3 shows.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
They agree which is most correct
The laws aren’t clear
Var try and make it in the attackers benefit
This screwed us as our player was holding back
Alan Dugdales Moustache
Well-Known Member
There's so much irony there.
Alan Dugdales Moustache
Well-Known Member
If you rewatch the ITV coverage of the match they have gone back to the frame at the
moment the ball actually leaves O'Hare's foot and taken the measurements from there. As OHare scoops the ball up his foot is actually off the floor at the decisive moment.
This is a split second later than when O'Hare is dwelling on the ball and my guess is Wright will be onside .
Also , and I'm not sure whether this matters, the defender running back has his arm towards his own goal. If arms are included in measuring offside then Wright is onside easily.
Robinshio
Well-Known Member
Arms are not included
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
What on earth is 'most correct'? If they're giving offside decisions based on players positions by a fraction of a millimetre and the idea that offside is not in anyway subjective, 'you're either offside or your not', then by definition there can only be one correct frame.
Calista
Well-Known Member
He wasn't I'm afraid Pete. Have you seen my screenshots in the 'Poll' thread?
robbiethemole
Well-Known Member
The outer part of the shoulder is
jimmyhillsfanclub
Well-Known Member
ccfcchris
Well-Known Member
Northeast sky blue
Well-Known Member
Not a chance, I'm going to hold this grudge for at least 50 years
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
they suffer from the same issues that the technology has i.e. the frame rate and pixelation mean you can not judge tight offsides
this is why this technology isn't being used after next year
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Calista
Well-Known Member
Well the current rules and procedures are bonkers, and like you and everyone else I think changes to VAR are needed.
But my pictures in the Toenail Poll thread speak for themselves. The momentary offside was technically correct, which has helped me to live with what happened rather than endlessly dispute it. It's offside both at the moment COH strikes the ball, and immediately after he releases it, so frame rates make no difference. And it's easily more than a toenail, so pixellation doesn't come into it either.
I realise people will believe whatever they want, but happily I'm no longer suffering that sense of injustice.
Nuskyblue
Well-Known Member
Onside in one out of three should be enough. This shows the evidence to be inconclusive you would think.
You're going to hold a grudge for the next 50 years? Sounds like you've spent too much time in Sunderland.
Bad Boy
Well-Known Member
Mrs BB posed a question earlier and I have absolutely no idea what the correct answer is, here goes....
If Onana had been given a 2nd yellow card during the penalty shoot out and subsequently been sent off could a substitute goalkeeper be brought on?
I kind of think not but hey I don't know.
Anyone know?
If Onana had been given a 2nd yellow card during the penalty shoot out and subsequently been sent off could a substitute goalkeeper be brought on?
I kind of think not but hey I don't know.
Anyone know?
Last edited:
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
No. Has to be someone who finished the game.
skybluelee
Well-Known Member
Well strictly speaking Sunderland fans stopped giving a shit about 1977 after a couple of years and only remembered to start frothing at the mouth about it in around 2005 when social media told them to.
Sick Boy
Well-Known Member
Coming up....conspiracy #2!
