Are you so dumb, you are not able to directly answer a question?
Do you refer to everyone by their religion?
Oh the irony coming from you lol. Self awareness not your forte is it snowflake lol.
Next you will say calling him a bloke has upset you lmao.
Are you so dumb, you are not able to directly answer a question?
Do you refer to everyone by their religion?
Are you so dumb, you are not able to directly answer a question?
Do you refer to everyone by their religion?
It's not just this it's a job creation exercise!!https://www.facebook.com/
Trust went out the window. Nobody believes anymore.
"The Day The Music Died"
Really would have been one of the greatest FA Cup moments of all time, and it's not even an exaggeration to say that.https://www.facebook.com/
Trust went out the window. Nobody believes anymore.
"The Day The Music Died"
it is when he first kicks the ball, which is mad - imagine a player balancing the ball on his foot for 2 seconds and then flicking it - a rule made for VARIs it Offside when the player begins to kick the ball, or when it leaves his foot. Because O'Hare dinks it up in the air. By the time it leaves his foot then Wright is onside.
Is that a crime lmaoAre you so dumb, you are not able to directly answer a question?
Do you refer to everyone by their religion?
Not clear in the lawsit is when he first kicks the ball, which is mad - imagine a player balancing the ball on his foot for 2 seconds and then flicking it - a rule made for VAR
you don't half talk some utter shiteIs this a plea to his mate @var
not according to VAR todayit is when he first kicks the ball, which is mad - imagine a player balancing the ball on his foot for 2 seconds and then flicking it - a rule made for VAR
They get to choose from 3 frames they used the first for both the second and third haji was on side I’ll betnot according to VAR today
If they have the choice of 3 frames they should look at them all and take the decision based on what at least 2 out of 3 shows.They get to choose from 3 frames they used the first for both the second and third haji was on side I’ll bet
They agree which is most correctIf they have the choice of 3 frames they should look at them all and take the decision based on what at least 2 out of 3 shows.
There's so much irony there.you don't half talk some utter shite
If you rewatch the ITV coverage of the match they have gone back to the frame at theit is when he first kicks the ball, which is mad - imagine a player balancing the ball on his foot for 2 seconds and then flicking it - a rule made for VAR
Arms are not includedIf you rewatch the ITV coverage of the match they have gone back to the frame at the
moment the ball actually leaves O'Hare's foot and taken the measurements from there. As OHare scoops the ball up his foot is actually off the floor at the decisive moment.
This is a split second later than when O'Hare is dwelling on the ball and my guess is Wright will be onside .
Also , and I'm not sure whether this matters, the defender running back has his arm towards his own goal. If arms are included in measuring offside then Wright is onside easily.
What on earth is 'most correct'? If they're giving offside decisions based on players positions by a fraction of a millimetre and the idea that offside is not in anyway subjective, 'you're either offside or your not', then by definition there can only be one correct frame.They agree which is most correct
He wasn't I'm afraid Pete. Have you seen my screenshots in the 'Poll' thread?They get to choose from 3 frames they used the first for both the second and third haji was on side I’ll bet
The outer part of the shoulder isArms are not included
Not a chance, I'm going to hold this grudge for at least 50 years
they suffer from the same issues that the technology has i.e. the frame rate and pixelation mean you can not judge tight offsidesHe wasn't I'm afraid Pete. Have you seen my screenshots in the 'Poll' thread?
NoHe wasn't I'm afraid Pete. Have you seen my screenshots in the 'Poll' thread?
Well the current rules and procedures are bonkers, and like you and everyone else I think changes to VAR are needed.they suffer from the same issues that the technology has i.e. the frame rate and pixelation mean you can not judge tight offsides
this is why this technology isn't being used after next year
Onside in one out of three should be enough. This shows the evidence to be inconclusive you would think.If they have the choice of 3 frames they should look at them all and take the decision based on what at least 2 out of 3 shows.
Not a chance, I'm going to hold this grudge for at least 50 years
Mrs BB posed a question earlier and I have absolutely no idea what the correct answer is, here goes....
If Onana had been given a 2nd yellow card during the penalty shoot out and subsequently been sent off could a substitute goalkeeper be brought on?
I kind of think not but hey I don't know.
Anyone know?
Well strictly speaking Sunderland fans stopped giving a shit about 1977 after a couple of years and only remembered to start frothing at the mouth about it in around 2005 when social media told them to.You're going to hold a grudge for the next 50 years? Sounds like you've spent too much time in Sunderland.
Coming up....conspiracy #2!No. Has to be someone who finished the game.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?