Grendel
Well-Known Member
Well I can - do you think Hull are a shite side?
And that is why you cannot be talked to about performances and form .
Well I can - do you think Hull are a shite side?
No you didn’t. You’ve gone back and edited it now which is an admission you shouldn’t have done it. And saying it’s a charity bet doesn’t change the fact it’s a bet.
View attachment 40548
It’s the internet. Grendel spreadsheet and internet points is all you need. On all seriousness mate I think you might have a gambling problem if “bet £100” is the first place you go in an argument.
You’ve done this for years. When you think the club needs defending you spend all day attacking anyone who says anything against your view. It’s tedious. It was tedious when it was Sisu and it’s tedious now. Just let people discuss on a forum.
Hull are not great no
Edited what?
I far from have a gambling problem, you are making more things up that you have no clue about.
Please point out where I am defending Doug King, you can't.
So what I'm hearing is if you lose 1-0 and get battered all game you played better than if you lost 2-0 and dominated .
Is that the forums default position now ?
Statistically they are unlucky and should be on 35 points before yesterday
Literally too stupid to converse with at this point. Edited your post. I posted the original. Seriously man just mute me and move on this is so boring.
Well yeah because you defended to keep a clean sheet. It just depends on who the manager is of each game and which bias you want to spin.
So to confirm you can't play well and lose ?
To confirm, you gave 2 scenarios. The one where we win is better.
What happens is that if scenario 1 includes an ex manager and scenario 2 doesn't, you will try your hardest to make out scenario 1 was better regardless of the result.
Basically you're talking rubbish aren't you , you can definitely play better than a different game where you conceded 1 less goal .
What even are you talking about honestly, stone age pub nonsense
Well we didn’t hold out did weWhat I am saying is that winning a game 1-0 but holding out and defending well is better than losing 2-0.
It really isn't hard to grasp.
What I am saying is that winning a game 1-0 but holding out and defending well is better than losing 2-0.
It really isn't hard to grasp.
I can’t believe opinion has to be so black and white.
it is possible to think Robins deserved to go and also think Lampards start has been poor
Wel I agree. There’s clearly deficiencies in the squad.Well I think some of the issues that bedevilled Robins are still causing problems for Lampard.
Hopefully some experience can be brought into the squad in January.
It's madness, considering he left us level on points with a team in the relegation zone.I'll have £100 on it? Mine can go to Samaritans, where do you want yours if you win?
Another poster who is fucking desperate since robins went (even though he wanted it) .
Going on about people looking silly, calls for robins to go and then spends weeks crying about it.
Did we play better yesterday or in the cup game v spurs , or was it by your mindest exactly the same
Wel I agree. There’s clearly deficiencies in the squad.
despite this, we were told one of the pro’s of lampard was that he managed to get Chelsea to 4th without making any signings.
I don’t think there’s a big enough improvement for it to be noticeable. I wouldn’t say a whole lots changed to be honest.
Obviously better against spurs because you take the opposition into consideration. I think both managers fucked up with the wrong changes or decisions too so it was pretty similar.
I don't need to check XG, shots or who our manager was to be able to say that.
It's madness, considering he left us level on points with a team in the relegation zone.
So now you're changing your tune
No, I'm not. I'm saying we played better against Tottenham than yesterday. It isn't changing any tune?
I also said the same about both matches in terms of changes fucking us.
Written off after 9 games - hahaha.Lampard will take us down.
He’s been a terrible appointment and I don’t see why you give someone time and money when they’ve taken the team backwards and shown no ability to improve results whatsoever and have no track record to give you confidence he can
His team selections are bizarre, he’s incapable of motivating players, the football is shit, he clearly doesn’t give a fuck about is either.
The bizarre insistence he’s a tactical genius who is just let down by terrible players is justified from people who backed him and frankly now look silly. The players aren’t great but they’re far better than they’ve shown under Lampard. he’s not a tactician and he’s not a motivator. He’s just a celebrity out of his depth.
Waste some more money and time on him if you want in the naive hope he’ll magically become a great manager, but he’s clearly been a disaster appointment. I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s gone before the start of next season
Can people who’ve been impressed by Lampards start just list off what they’ve been impressed by so far
True. He does dress smart.I like his coat
*5Congratulations!! To you and the good lady.
if you listen to Rob Gurney who covered West Brom whilst BTA was there, he is very surprised at how little impact he has had here so far.I have a feeling asante was the O'Hare replacement
So it's a fact you can play better than a different game even if you lose by 1 more goal , the same way it's a fact you can play better in 1 game over the other despite both ending the same scoreline .
This isn't hard , but you seem to want to make it hard
You were comparing a 3-0 loss where they were 2 up at half time with a 2-1 loss where we fucked it up in the last couple of minutes with a pathetic individual mistake which meant we lost the game.
I'm sure you can see the difference as comparing 2 games where we lost in the last few minutes 2-1.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?