Mary_Mungo_Midge
Well-Known Member
I must admit I don't normally favour conspiracy theories, and only have a passing knowledge of how hedge funds work; but the devil in me can't help but put this one out there.
The nature of hedge fund investments is to have an alternative outcome, or Plan B for any given investment. So hypothetically, if you invest one pound in a company being successful, you also bet one pound on them being unsuccessful, or their competitor being successful, so either way the fund partially wins. Losses are mitigated by the second investment - that being the hedge. Provided more than 50% of the intvestment decisions are correct, and the hedge works, then in theory that being how wealth is generated.
So, where's the 'hedge' in SISU's CCFC gamble? A a business, they're not accustomed to flights of fantasy. So there must be a hedge. A safety net. A fall back to mitigate losses, surely?
Well, from an investment decision, that side is easy. They saw a team on its knees and thought they could turn it around after getting it for peanuts, and bullying people into handing over shares for a pittance. The investment.
But it didn't work.
So, was relegation 'the hedge'? By failing on the footballing side so dramatically and therefore being relegated, they've got all parties to the table to discuss Arena ownership. Surely it's wouldn't have happened without relegation and the spectre of the club being wound up, post-relegation and the financial woes associated there with.
From the word go, was the plan to either succeed, or fail miserably? The investment and the hedge?
The nature of hedge fund investments is to have an alternative outcome, or Plan B for any given investment. So hypothetically, if you invest one pound in a company being successful, you also bet one pound on them being unsuccessful, or their competitor being successful, so either way the fund partially wins. Losses are mitigated by the second investment - that being the hedge. Provided more than 50% of the intvestment decisions are correct, and the hedge works, then in theory that being how wealth is generated.
So, where's the 'hedge' in SISU's CCFC gamble? A a business, they're not accustomed to flights of fantasy. So there must be a hedge. A safety net. A fall back to mitigate losses, surely?
Well, from an investment decision, that side is easy. They saw a team on its knees and thought they could turn it around after getting it for peanuts, and bullying people into handing over shares for a pittance. The investment.
But it didn't work.
So, was relegation 'the hedge'? By failing on the footballing side so dramatically and therefore being relegated, they've got all parties to the table to discuss Arena ownership. Surely it's wouldn't have happened without relegation and the spectre of the club being wound up, post-relegation and the financial woes associated there with.
From the word go, was the plan to either succeed, or fail miserably? The investment and the hedge?
Last edited: