What are your thoughts on the comments on that thread?
Re-structuring our outgoings, to make us more competitive.
How dare we.
:facepalm:
I think they are typical of a football m-board when a wind-up merchant from another club provokes a debate. There follows a generally bunch of ignorant posts because nobody knows the ins and outs of other clubs. Funnily enough CCFC's first contribution to that thread was to respond to a sarcastic remark about our club. We don't like our rent and we put the prices up for big games. But CCFC wouldn't have known that, because he doesn't know our club like we do, much like we don't know your club like you do. Doesn't make him a c**t or mean he shags his sister like.
I think they are typical of a football m-board when a wind-up merchant from another club provokes a debate. There follows a generally bunch of ignorant posts because nobody knows the ins and outs of other clubs. Funnily enough CCFC's first contribution to that thread was to respond to a sarcastic remark about our club. We don't like our rent and we put the prices up for big games. But CCFC wouldn't have known that, because he doesn't know our club like we do, much like we don't know your club like you do. Doesn't make him a c**t or mean he shags his sister like.
I agree, as a supporter of said shitty tinpot club we gotta know our place, count our blessings (and indeed our fingers) and not be sore, sarcastic or ironic (especially about England's best ever left-back) towards the massive teams who have to slum it down here for a bit. Sorry, just sorry for everything, especially our shittiness and tinpotedness.
How much rent do you pay per year/season at the bescot?
How much rent do you pay per year/season at the bescot?
Moves around (market and index linked) but is around £400,000 and paid directly to the pension fund of our owner/chairman. Hence the degree of "rent envy" you see on there.
Moves around (market and index linked) but is around £400,000 and paid directly to the pension fund of our owner/chairman. Hence the degree of "rent envy" you see on there.
Ah right. So you're similar to us then. We pay around that, including costs IIRC, except to some insects.
Something to point out though, excluding our higher attendances, we actually have the 8th or 9th highest budget in the league. We used some of this budget to renovate our training ground, repaint/buy the club coaches etc. I'm not sure what your budget is, but we are on a similar financial platform IMO, so I don't understand the bitterness towards our loans/purchases etc from Walsall.
To be fair though, we have been targeted by many who say we are buying our way out of the league. On the contrary, we are using what limited resources we have to do the best we can. We are however, extremely lucky to have a manager like Mowbray, and Venus, who seem to be able to run a club properly.
It was £400K into the owners pension pot IIRC when we were going through it It's also worth remembering a lot of Walsall fans were standing with us a couple of years ago when we didn't have a clue where we were going to play.
I think they are typical of a football m-board when a wind-up merchant from another club provokes a debate. There follows a generally bunch of ignorant posts because nobody knows the ins and outs of other clubs. Funnily enough CCFC's first contribution to that thread was to respond to a sarcastic remark about our club. We don't like our rent and we put the prices up for big games. But CCFC wouldn't have known that, because he doesn't know our club like we do, much like we don't know your club like you do. Doesn't make him a c**t or mean he shags his sister like.
King o kings 204 1990. We were skint following the move from Fellows Park. Some right dodgy firms that were involved in the move left us bereft and our "saviour" (his words) our still owner/chairman brought the freehold to the stadium for £400k ( I.e what is currently a single year's rent). He has it theoretically up for sale for around £6.5m. Possibly the only man ever to buy a lower league (tin-pot if you will) football club and make a lot of money in the process.
He's done some good stuff to be fair too. We always make a small profit and while he's in charge we will never have financial trouble. Cynics would say that the football team has to be financially healthy to pay him his rent so it is vested and self interest that drives the prudence. So, back to that thread, the turnover to expenditure stuff, the rent stuff, the ticket price changes are all juxtapositions between our two clubs, some of which get some of us frustrated that means when we see clubs getting a break from the league on FFP or on their rent, or hugely outspend their income, it sometimes feels that odds that are already stacked against a small (shitty if you will) club get stacked even higher.
You are a similar story to us in some ways as in the ground situation.
Regarding the bold bit though, I do fully understand what you're saying. However, we haven't been "given a break" from the FL. We didn't have the luxury that Leeds, Leicester etc had. We still had points taken away like everyone else. We still had massive debts to contend with. We were TAKEN, not forced to move, 35 miles away from home.
Without sounding like we need a violin played, we have really had some bad times over the last 15 years. According to SISU, the club is now self sufficient, so basically any money the club generates is what's put on the pitch. This season has seen a rise in attendances, so in short, the CCFC fans are putting the likes of Joe Cole on the pitch. Not some sugar daddy. We are living within our means, and luckily we've managed to build a decent squad. We did have hardly any players this summer, only 7 or so senior players IIRC. Like I said, our main asset is Mowbray and Venus, without them, we would be in the bottom half/ relegation zone IMO.
On the "break from the FL", at the risk of sounding like one of those ignorant types I spoke of before, did the league not break their own rules by allowing you to play more than 30 miles from Coventry? Not saying you should be grateful or anything and certainly not on the scale of the way they broke their own rules for Leeds' golden share, but they broke their own rules to assist you did they not?
On the "break from the FL", at the risk of sounding like one of those ignorant types I spoke of before, did the league not break their own rules by allowing you to play more than 30 miles from Coventry? Not saying you should be grateful or anything and certainly not on the scale of the way they broke their own rules for Leeds' golden share, but they broke their own rules to assist you did they not?
I have to agree with that, the FL love their grey area rules.
However, in some ways, that "break" caused us more harm. It would have forced SISU and ACL (the Ricoh's owners) to negotiate a better deal for the club. Instead their "break" reduced our revenue, moved the club out of it's city, and more importantly IMO, caused some lifelong fans to turn their back on the club.
I honestly wouldn't wish what happened in them 18 months at Sixfields on any football fan, of any club. Unless it happens to you, without sounding patronising, you honestly have no idea.
THE only way is up now boys we have been down too long now is our time its tony time
Errrrrr...fuck off!Should come as no surprise, after all, we are talking about folk from 'six fingered banjo plucking country'.
Coventry are already spending their way to the top
Anderson also said he'd sort out the ticket fiasco
Ok, apologies for assuming you played banjo.Errrrrr...fuck off!
I am Walsall born n bred...but CCFC till I die!
...onwards & upwards PUSB
It was a straight swap deal for Pete WatermanOk, apologies for assuming you played banjo.
Our budget is 8-10th in the league chris Anderson has said that aswell as tony mowbray as did steve waggott they all said we need to punch above our weight .. Wigan have double our budget. Cluesess fuckers they are
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?