Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Waggott: McGoldrick out of our hands (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter skyblu3sk
  • Start date Oct 30, 2012
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
S

skyblu3sk

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #1
IT'S OUT OF OUR HANDS, SAY CITY

COVENTRY City will do everything they can to upgrade David McGoldrick's loan deal into a long-term contract at the Ricoh Arena.
But the club admit there is nothing they can do until Nottingham Forest decide whether they want to recall the striker in January or put him up for sale to the highest bidder.

McGoldrick's eye-catching form has made him a hero with the Sky Blues' fans, who again chanted “sign him up“ when he slotted home his sixth goal in as many games to clinch Saturday's 1-0 win at Leyton Orient.

But development director Steve Waggott stressed: “We can't start talking publicly about all the scenarios surrounding David's future because there are lots of ifs, buts and maybes involved here.

“His form in front of goal has been out standing of late and, of course, it would be great if we could extend his stay beyond January when his loan deal is due to expire.

“But, while we are delighted with the goals he is scoring for Coventry City, he is still Nottingham Forest's player.“

McGoldrick cost Forest £1million when he arrived from Southampton in 2009 and if boss Sean O'Driscoll decides he is surplus to requirements at the City Ground they would want to recoup some of that outlay rather than allow him to leave as a free agent next summer.

But the Sky Blues are not well placed to compete in terms of transfer fees or wages and know that the more goals he scores the more competition they will face with several clubs, including Notts County and Charlton athletic, already keeping regular tabs on his performances.

“It's out of our hands,“ said Gary McSheffrey, who played just behind McGoldrick in a revamped attack at Brisbane Road.

“Forest have sent him out to get some games under his belt and the form he's in at the minute he would probably be a good asset to their squad in the Championship, “His goal on Saturday was a gift from their goalie but he was in that area to be composed, go round the keeper and slot it in and you tend to get those opportunities when you are on top of your game.

“Since he came here he has got his head down and worked really hard and wherever he ends up they will be getting a really good player.“
 
U

UNCLE MONTY

New Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #2
Sadly we have no chance of keeping him. Let's start getting Cody up to speed now, we are going to be reliant on him come Jan.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #3
If he wants to stay we will have a decent chance of keeping him. If he don't want to stay we have no chance.
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #4
Shouldn't the headline say: McSheffery: McGoldrick out of our hands?
 
T

theprince

New Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #5
Waggott will go on and on about "we are trying our best" "we are nearly there" "we hope to bring him over the line" "negotiations are going well" and similar bullshit we have experienced before. The truth is SISU have no momey or intentions of spending any, McGoldrick will want atleast what he gets at Forest plus a signing on fee. No-way will SISU sanction that. Our worry has to be who will score the goals at the business end of the season to keep us in this division !!
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #6
Even if he wants to stay he's well within his rights to demand his current wages, and forest are within their rights to ask for a transfer fee.

[sarcasm]Apart from those small sticking points, it's a done deal. [/sarcasm]
 

BurbageSkyBlues

New Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #7
Shouldn't this read

' if they give him to us for free, and he'll accept minimum wages, then we will be able to keep him......but we can't be bothered to make a proper deal, so we are preparing the expectations of our fans to be resigned to another post-Christmas free fall'

Do something proactive for once, Sisu, give us something to look forward to, some hope, some reason to believe in you!
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #8
I honestly believe a Cody on form could POSSIBLY score as many. He needs a decent partner with him though!
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #9
Surely to freefall you need somewhere to fall from?
We haven't even stepped onto the ladder yet.
 
T

theprince

New Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #10
Cody MacDonald is showing us all why he is in the lower leagues, yes he can score, misses plenty too though. But there are obviously other issues, weight ? injuries, dare i say convenient ones at that. Last season it was "he has had no pre-season so what is the excuse this season ? Can't rely on him i'm afraid.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #11
This statement tells you everything you need to know.

Waggott is only talking about extending the loan, which we all know won't happen. Nowt else. No talk at all about the possibility of actually signing the player!

So that's it then, come Jan he's gone. We're fooked.

We haven't got enough money to sign him ....... strangely enough though we do have enough money to buy half the stadium.


:jerkit:
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #12
Roughly translated 'we have no chance of him staying'
 

We'll_live_and_die

Super Moderator
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #13
What really pisses me off about this is we are going to be relying on Cody come January and with him not getting 90minutes on a regular basis he will be unfit and not as sharp as he could be. Yet again he is going to look poor and we will keep swapping the strikers around. Ok we need to field McG while he is here, but play Cody up with him to let him get a couple of months of match fitness before he becomes the talisman that he can be.

CCFC seem to have a habit of letting good players go to waste on the bench.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #14
It'll be fine though won't it!!

We don't need his silly little goals. We are going to win 15 out of 31 games, be all but unbeatable and only lose 3 matches for the rest of the season, finishing in the top 6 come the end of the campaign.
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #15
theprince said:
Waggott will go on and on about "we are trying our best" "we are nearly there" "we hope to bring him over the line" "negotiations are going well" and similar bullshit we have experienced before. The truth is SISU have no momey or intentions of spending any, McGoldrick will want atleast what he gets at Forest plus a signing on fee. No-way will SISU sanction that. Our worry has to be who will score the goals at the business end of the season to keep us in this division !!
Click to expand...

I'm sorry prince, but aren't you quoting yourself on Hoffman takeovers?


" we are trying our best", "we are nearly there", "negotiations are going well", and similar bullshit we've heard before.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #16
Wilko's sell A4 copier paper and the software company GSP do a nice little CD-Rom that allows you to create letterheads.

If only I had Hoffman's email address!!
 
T

Tank Top

New Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #17
Astute said:
If he wants to stay we will have a decent chance of keeping him. If he don't want to stay we have no chance.
Click to expand...

"A very Astute observation"
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #18
Otis said:
This statement tells you everything you need to know.

Waggott is only talking about extending the loan, which we all know won't happen. Nowt else. No talk at all about the possibility of actually signing the player!

So that's it then, come Jan he's gone. We're fooked.

We haven't got enough money to sign him ....... strangely enough though we do have enough money to buy half the stadium.


:jerkit:
Click to expand...

and sack AT RS and pay their contracts off, sign more players in loan and have others on contracts not playing.

Excellent.

And the new contracts for a new manager and assistant/coach

Imagine how much money we could club to together with the wages from bad decisions
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #19
As we all know, they have said they have the money to buy half the stadium.

Owning half the stadium is only any good if you can fill it. Selling (or not signing in this case) your best players is not the way to fill the stadium.
 
Last edited: Oct 30, 2012
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #20
Rich said:
What really pisses me off about this is we are going to be relying on Cody come January and with him not getting 90minutes on a regular basis he will be unfit and not as sharp as he could be. Yet again he is going to look poor and we will keep swapping the strikers around. Ok we need to field McG while he is here, but play Cody up with him to let him get a couple of months of match fitness before he becomes the talisman that he can be.

CCFC seem to have a habit of letting good players go to waste on the bench.
Click to expand...

I agree need a formation that allows cody and Goldie to play. Pressure will be off cody that yo Goldie.
Hopefully he will pop in a few and hit the ground running if the worse happens
 

TheParsonsHose

Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #21
Otis said:
As we all know, they have said they have the money to buy half the stadium.

Owning half the stadium is only any good if you can fill it. Selling your best players is not the way to fill the stadium.
Click to expand...

Surely though owning half the stadium adds many value streams such as...

Concerts and events
Better return on food and beverage sold
Less or no rent

Filled or not this is money we don't see today ?
 
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #22
Otis said:
Selling your best players is not the way to fill the stadium.
Click to expand...

Is that the new sisu scam?
Selling players we have on loan?

(This thread is about our chances of keeping McGoldrick)
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #23
Preparing us for the loss
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #24
Godiva said:
Is that the new sisu scam?
Selling players we have on loan?

(This thread is about our chances of keeping McGoldrick)
Click to expand...

Corrected my post. That's what I meant. Not signing a player who we desperately need.
 
A

aodea

New Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #25
Dont see how we will keep him, unless he himself decides that he would like to stay, maybe go back to Forest in Jan see out contract and join us in the summer. Have a huge amount of time for him and it will be hard to be competing without him. He has scored nearly half of our leauge games this year.
 

skyblueman

New Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #26
McGoldrick is in form and is worth money - we desperately need to keep him but we won't - Waggot & fisher's plan is all based on freebies on cheap wages - it WILL Fail - it IS FAILING - but it will make no difference - forget him he will be gone
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #27
Where would we be without McGoldrick's goals?
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #28
Otis said:
Where would we be without McGoldrick's goals?
Click to expand...

Believe it or not PSGM1 did a very accurate analysis in a thread the other day ,objective too,get your head round that. Seven points worse off according to that and it may have been before Saturday.:facepalm:
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #29
He is the one single player who has shown any quality whatsoever on a consistent basis.
 

Bertola

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #30
Another January where we lose our top scorer...

It's almost as if they don't learn.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #31
Indeed.

:facepalm:
 
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #32
Otis said:
Corrected my post. That's what I meant. Not signing a player who we desperately need.
Click to expand...

We desperately need Ronaldo - if they have the money to buy half the stadium, surely they can afford Ronaldo.

Look, if McG is available for price we can afford, then I think Waggott will try to sign him.
And if McG can accept the kind of wages we can afford, then he will probably stay here.

Don't expect the club to ... again ... break the bank to get any player, including a goalscorer.
 

Monkeyface

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #33
Godiva said:
We desperately need Ronaldo - if they have the money to buy half the stadium, surely they can afford Ronaldo.

Look, if McG is available for price we can afford, then I think Waggott will try to sign him.
And if McG can accept the kind of wages we can afford, then he will probably stay here.

Don't expect the club to ... again ... break the bank to get any player, including a goalscorer.
Click to expand...

They brought the club, if they didn't want to spend money they should have done their homework.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #34
Godiva said:
We desperately need Ronaldo - if they have the money to buy half the stadium, surely they can afford Ronaldo.

Look, if McG is available for price we can afford, then I think Waggott will try to sign him.
And if McG can accept the kind of wages we can afford, then he will probably stay here.

Don't expect the club to ... again ... break the bank to get any player, including a goalscorer.
Click to expand...

I'm amazed we hav'nt heard any more on the Fan Shares agenda that was raised 3-4 months back ,would'nt a player purchase be the ideal driver for such a move?
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 30, 2012
  • #35
fucvk sake stop moaning!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

hes a loanee, hes not our player...wait and see wether we try to keep him to the best of our abilities or not.

we could sign messi tommrow and this forum would be just all about when his 5 year contract ends and wether we have plans to extend it yet.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?