Otis
Well-Known Member
Yep. the parents definitely should have been there to supervise for sure.
You make a valid point, but the same could be said of a 14 year old lad who has a disastrous sexual encounter with a girl his own age.
I take the point about parental consideration.
Really?? Just the thought of my Mrs and another bloke makes my blood boil!! I honestly think I'd flip! I wouldn't be in court on a sexual assault, it'd be GBH or worse!There's a power dynamic in sex that makes it different for guys and girls. It's damn hard to get a lad to fuck you if he isn't into it I'd bet. Still, a crime is a crime.
Don't get the issue with the husbands kinks though. Had a mate who did a bit of escorting and he said it was quite a common request. Lots of guys get off on watching their wife with another guy apparently.
There's a power dynamic in sex that makes it different for guys and girls. It's damn hard to get a lad to fuck you if he isn't into it I'd bet. Still, a crime is a crime.
Don't get the issue with the husbands kinks though. Had a mate who did a bit of escorting and he said it was quite a common request. Lots of guys get off on watching their wife with another guy apparently.
What he wanted more?So it's looking like the one who reported it has been in touch with her in the last couple of years and was rejected by them.
Looks like he's become obsessed, so when she rejected him recently and he went on a course, he suddenly realised he was a "Victim".What he wanted more?
Looks like he's become obsessed, so when she rejected him recently and he went on a course, he suddenly realised he was a "Victim".
Why do you put victim in inverted commas? Laws are made for a reason and that is for protection.
Some of you will have seen the ongoing court case involving the husband-and-wife BBC presenters Tony and Julie Wadsworth, in which they are accused of indecent assault and outraging public decency by having sex in public (they deny all charges).
This case was brought by a number of "men" in their twenties and thirties who were allegedly flashed at and invited to take part in sex acts with Mrs W when they were around 14 years of age.
Hands up who would have given their right bollock to fool around with a 40 year old looker when they were 14?
Anyone? Anyone?
Bueller??
Instead, these guys report them to the police twenty years later!
Unbelievable pussies!
Why would he be a peado by saying that if he was 14 he'd have jumped at the chance, as did the lads who got the chance.are you a peado?
Errm no he's not, he's saying he would've jumped at the chance when he was 14.hes saying he encourages underage kids to have sex with older people.
voyeur to peado stuff?
Yeah in the eyes of law it's wrong but she is a fit old sort and even at 14 I would of probably let her take a little shit on me or something
Because they having been found guilty? Therefore at the moment there is an alleged victim, not an actual victim.
Oh it's not because you think boys would just want it anyway? When you use inverted commas it would suggest, in that context, a suggestion they are hardly a victim at all - a view you have already expressed I believe?
No, it's because at the moment he is an alleged victim, innocent until proven guilty and all that matey.
Errm no he's not, he's saying he would've jumped at the chance when he was 14.
What about this from Dan, he must be like a massive peado, cause he'd let her shite on him.
To be fair, fucking a 14 year old is illegal but shitting on someone isn't. That's weird.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?