It was always going to be next to impossible to replace Vik. I think he will be an Arsenal player next year
He's going to have his pick , Bayern are also interested , he would be wasting his talents if he signed for Manure Utd.No there was a term in the contract where Sporting could pay a fee to reduce the sell on from 15% to 10% and Im pretty sure that covered what we owed Brightom
No there was a term in the contract where Sporting could pay a fee to reduce the sell on from 15% to 10% and Im pretty sure that covered what we owed Brightom
This has been discussed to death on hereNo there was a term in the contract where Sporting could pay a fee to reduce the sell on from 15% to 10% and Im pretty sure that covered what we owed Brightom
Yes no I agree with all but the last bit that we owe Brighton anything more and Sporting paid us a fee to reduce the clauseThis has been discussed to death on here
Pretty sure you're confusing a few things
Firstly Sporting covered the initial sell on % to Brighton
Secondly, the reduction from 15 to 10% was because they had already paid out on some performance clauses (otherwise we could have been making ridiculous money on the back end of this deal).
So King has said that whatever sell on fee we do receive, part of that will go to Brighton.
Don’t think it did.
The doc says Sporting covered the original sell on due to Brighton that was €2.2m IIRC. Don’t think it mentions future sell ons but that might be covered as part of it.
That is the FIFA solidarity payments that the buying club is obligated to distribute to any clubs involved in his development up to the age of 23. Not just Brighton, but his former clubs. This has nothing to do with whatever sell-on clause Brighton negotiated with us as part of his transfer... which Doug King has also confirmed will apply to any further monies that we receive from Vik's potential sale.
The document also mentioned intermediatory fees. I expect this relates to the fees Vik's agents charged Sporting for the deal...
Yeah for BTA. Part of their deal meant they could pay us to reduce the fee from 15 to 10%Have we used a percentage of the Gyokeres sell on fee ?
10% for three years at Brighton seems high
| Club | Solidary contribution |
|---|---|
| Brighton & Hove Albion | €360k |
| FC St. Pauli | €120k |
| IF Brommapojkarna | €480k |
| IFK Aspudden-Tellus | €240k |
King has said we will though? And why wouldn't we, if sell ons didn't apply to further fees that would be a massive loophole.Yes no I agree with all but the last bit that we owe Brighton anything more and Sporting paid us a fee to reduce the clause
Any money we are likely to receive for Viktor is already offset and being used to pay for Bassette and BTA, sadly.
BTA was paid for using the sell on we sold to them last summer if a recall correctly. Any sale for Vik now is an additional 5million which i doubt we have even touched yet.Any money we are likely to receive for Viktor is already offset and being used to pay for Bassette and BTA, sadly.
The additional €1m is agent fees most likely.
Far too late in life, I learned - what in retrospect was pretty obvious - how much easier it is to make money when you're involved in something where there are big numbers flying around.Nice work if you can get it.
Something like £1.5M from memory?Speaking of does anyone know how much sporting paid for Gyökeres’ sell on to be reduced because if you add it onto the £20m + £4.5m we’d have made if he goes in the summer we’ve done well to make money off him
The chances are that whoever buys Gykores will pay the fee in instalments. I assume that our sell-on fee will be paid in the same way, so we will get 10% of each stage payment.
It’s not necessarily such bad news as it sounds because no doubt we will pay our outgoing transfer fees in the same way.
Any outstanding money from the original €24 transfer has to be paid up in full.
We receive our additional 10% as and when Sporting receive it, unless we negotiate otherwise... So if for example the initial installment to Sporting was €30m then we wouldn't get much to begin with... but we could immediately add the future installments into our cash-flow planning...
Any outstanding money from the original €24 transfer has to be paid up in full.
We receive our additional 10% as and when Sporting receive it, unless we negotiate otherwise... So if for example the initial installment to Sporting was €30m then we wouldn't get much to begin with... but we could immediately add the future installments into our cash-flow planning...
It says something like "We ripped off Coventry".Any Portuguese speakers able to translate this sign from Gyokeres’ Instagram post? I would hope it’s not derogatory towards us…
View attachment 43297
I thought you were taking the piss until I put it into google translateIt says something like "We ripped off Coventry".
Any Portuguese speakers able to translate this sign from Gyokeres’ Instagram post? I would hope it’s not derogatory towards us…
View attachment 43297
Checked with my Portuguese friend, its we fucked Coventry overAny Portuguese speakers able to translate this sign from Gyokeres’ Instagram post? I would hope it’s not derogatory towards us…
View attachment 43297
But viks video was so genuine loolCan only imagine the meltdown if Hamer or (god forbid) O’Hare posted something similar.
I don’t get this at all. He was only on loan at St. Pauli ( from Brighton) there’s no way they are entitled to £120kFifa solidarity fee is a flat 5% of the transfer fee paid in proportion to his time at his previous clubs up to the age of 23. Approximately:
Club Solidary contribution Brighton & Hove Albion €360k FC St. Pauli €120k IF Brommapojkarna €480k IFK Aspudden-Tellus €240k
The additional €1m is agent fees most likely.
The sell on fee to Brighton is in addition and will be whatever they negotiated as part of his sale. It's allegedly 15%...
To be fair life has shafted that fat beardy twat in the pictureApparently don't quote me on this, it's the Sporting Lisbon fans saying " we shafted Coventry "
They played a part in his development so they areI don’t get this at all. He was only on loan at St. Pauli ( from Brighton) there’s no way they are entitled to £120k
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?