Especially as it sounds like we were battered at times.
Are people just annoyed about the way we draw where we were battered or just the fact we didn't win?
I personally didn't expect a win but is it a good sign the stats? Last season we drew or lost but if we had more possession it made everything ok?
Well....we didn't lose 7-1 like Norwich did first L1 game!
Well....we didn't lose 7-1 like Norwich did first L1 game!
Of course we should be concerned about the performance, but before the game I did think we could well lose, so to take a point has to be good in a game where we didn't perform, surely?
I think it's more the fact it was Yeovil......
Oh right, I see, Yeovil?
Isn't their full name supposed to be 'Only Yeovil' though?
Draw away, win at home, simple
if you are happy with a point...who am i to argue...me...it was a shit point..we could of easily lost that game.
Spot on, Otis. We created the chances to win it despite playing shite. It's a new team and a big culture shock, so results are more important than performances at this time.
if you are happy with a point...who am i to argue...me...it was a shit point..we could of easily lost that game.
But over time, it being a new team will be less of an issue than it was today: then we should be more demanding of results due to quality winning out, if we are indeed the better team.Rather irrelevant I would say in this game - Yeovil gave debuts to 6 players and 2 of their subs. Same as us if you include Daniels.
I'm happy with a point at the moment. A lot of what I think will be decided in the next 7 days in two massive home games! It's too early to be jumping to silly conclusions.
God I wish we were Swansea...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?