Well I'd suggest the American treasury has done a very piss poor job up to now.Well, it is when a total moron lets the world's richest man run riot at the Treasury.
Because a) if referring to Trump, he isn’t a successful businessman, he’s a fraud and b) a country isn’t a business.Well I'd suggest the American treasury has done a very piss poor job up to now.
So why not let someone who's been more successful in business than anyone else alive today have a go running it?
Whatever you think of him, he does have a very impressive CV.
And things can't get any worse for the US than they are right now. They are 4 months away from financial armagedon.
So if I have this right, Trump is trying to address the high levels of US public debt, while at the same time also deliberately overstating Putin's threat to justify "exorbitant defence spending" that will "milk the tax payer"?Ffs mate, how fucking naive are you???
Of fucking course they are going to big up Putin"s threat to the US and Europe, how the fuck else are they going to justify the exorbitant defence spending?? How are they going to milk the tax payers otherwise??? How do they keep the big money contracts rolling in without a big bad guy in the world???
If its not Putin it's China, or Nortn Korea and if its not them they'd have to invent one.
But there will always be one.
The American government is 36 trillion dollars in debt, that equates to 100,000 dollars for every man, woman and child in the country.
If they don't raise the debt ceiling even higher, then by August they won't be able to pay the public sector, and will default on their debt. That will lead to a global meltdown of epic proportions.
They need a bad guy in the world to maintain defence jobs and keep employment levels high.
Trump is trying to address that, and he's doing it by ramping up their economy, the tariffs will ultimately lead to renegotiated trade deals, Increased NATO spending will be on American made arms, and equipment.
Remaining tarifs on China will see global companies move their manufacturing facilities back to America to gain access to that market. All of which will mean jobs for American workers and tax dollars for the government.
Trump has been open and upfront about the plan from the day he announced he'd run for office. It's even called" M.A.G.A." for fuck sake.
How much more obvious can it be?
Reading so much bollocks on here from people who don't understand or hear what he's said is hilarious.
5D financial chess.So if I have this right, Trump is trying to address the high levels of US public debt, while at the same time also deliberately overstating Putin's threat to justify "exorbitant defence spending" that will "milk the tax payer"?
The threat from Putin = defence contracts = money for the rich company owners = jobs for American workers = tax for the treasurySo if I have this right, Trump is trying to address the high levels of US public debt, while at the same time also deliberately overstating Putin's threat to justify "exorbitant defence spending" that will "milk the tax payer"?
You must be concerned that Trump's new pick for NASA administrator wants to spend billions on making sure Americans "return" to the moon?The threat from Putin = defence contracts = money for the rich company owners = jobs for American workers = tax for the treasury
In short the wealthy factory workers get rich, and keep the poor working hard and paying their taxes.
If the working classes are working they arnt rioting and rocking the boat causing a revolution.
Yep, fucking crazy idea.You must be concerned that Trump's new pick for NASA administrator wants to spend billions on making sure Americans "return" to the moon?
Trump will fix it. He said he would.Yep, fucking crazy idea.
America is bankrupt, half the planet can't feed itself, and yet they want to go "back" to the moon.
Again, (imo) this is just another case of financial contracts being given out to keep the NASA employees and their supply chain in work.
Although the cost in real terms is negligible as every penny spent will be subject to direct tax (as in paye) and then indirect tax (everytime a nasa employee spends his wages he/she pays local tax) so the money trickles back to the treasuree over time.
But never the less, the end product of all the investment (the moon trip) seams totally pointless.
It will be interesting to watch.Trump will fix it. He said he would.
Here you go #shmmeee
There's even a graph in it, and we know how much you love a graph!
US could run short of money to pay its bills by August without a debt limit deal, CBO says
The United States is on track to hit its statutory debt ceiling — the so-called X-date when the country runs short of money to pay its bills— as early as August without a deal between lawmakers and the White House.apnews.com
To be fair its a really easy mistake to make. Send a cruise missile in then a cluster bomb a few minutes later as they are trying to deal with the injured and dead.It was just a mistake, never mind. Silly old Russia, what are they like eh!
Unfortunately it's no laughing matter for the US
‘It was like that when I got here’ is one of Homer Simpson’s three lifetime excuses he passes on to Bart
‘It’s my first day’, which actually he’s also sort of said in that post. So it’s a hat tricktbf so was 'blame it on the guy who doesn't speak English' so that's two he's stolen from Homer's playbook. What was the other one?
I wouldn’t be surprised if the US just walk away from this now that they’ve got their mineral deal in place. It’ll leave Ukraine with no US military aid or security guarantees- whoever is overseeing their strategy in all this is majorly incompetent.
Well that's what you get with Trump. Trump is far more supportive of Putin and doesn't give a fuck about legal obligations let alone moral ones. Either way Ukraine gets fucked over by America.Ukraine would be crazy to sign a mineral deal without continued U.S. military aid/ guarantees. Problem is Putin doesn’t seem to want to budge either way
Now that they have a mineral deal it will be interesting if US citizens will be protected.
US will 'move on' from Ukraine peace talks if no progress soon
The US Secretary of State's comments come as Ukraine says it took a first step towards signing a minerals deal with the US.www.bbc.co.uk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?