Alan Dugdales Moustache
Well-Known Member
I have to laugh at the title " tactical" nuclear weapon. As if it's soft and cuddly almost.
I have to laugh at the title " tactical" nuclear weapon. As if it's soft and cuddly almost.The Rat I smell is for them to be dropping tactical Nuclear weapons from a distance. Removing their own troops from the immediate danger area.
They are, in the 1991 Kuwait battle, USA were responsible for a quarter of USA deaths!'Friendly fire' are fairly common instances in war.
Refused to obey orders too?
Seems Putin treats his troops like shit
Doesn't say 'refused to obey orders' does it.
Erm, second bullet point does indeed say refused to obery orders...Doesn't say 'refused to obey orders' does it. Just 'tensions', which could be anything, disagreement on tactics, investment, colour of uniform or even as something as petty as the choice of restaurant for tonight's meal. The lack of clarity almost certainly means it's either made up or insignificant.
You're being played like a fiddle by Western governments and the media. The west's propaganda machine is just as much in full swing as the Russian's. As the old saying goes 'believe half of what you see and none of what you hear'.
Companies A and C of the 3rd Battalion, Parachute Regiment, British Army engaged each other in an hour-long firefight in the Falkland Islands involving heavy weapons and artillery strikes, resulting in five deaths and three injuries.
Doesn't say 'refused to obey orders' does it.
As yes, my mistake, even so, anything coming out the west is just as much bullshit as Russia saving Ukraine from Nazi's.
"My mistake" would have sufficed.As yes, my mistake, even so, anything coming out the west is just as much bullshit as Russia saving Ukraine from Nazi's.
I would always be more likely to believe something coming from Western sources than from Russian.Well that's just not true is it.
The West has had very good intelligence on the war.
The first casualty of war is truth, it would be incredibly naive to assume that propaganda is one sidedWell that's just not true is it.
The West has had very good intelligence on the war.
Very true.The first casualty of war is truth, it would be incredibly naive to assume that propaganda is one sided
The first casualty of war is truth, it would be incredibly naive to assume that propaganda is one sided
The first casualty of war is truth, it would be incredibly naive to assume that propaganda is one sided
Of course.
But we know that Russia's propaganda is on another level, and to say that "anything coming out the west is just as much bullshit as Russia saving Ukraine from Nazi's" is plainly not true.
The key word is anything.
You said "anything coming out the west is just as much bullshit as Russia saving Ukraine from Nazi's"
That is not true.
I agree. Big difference between anything and everything, so I never take anything as fact, but think maybe there is some truth in it l, whereas, with Russia, I expect it all to be total bullshitThe key word is anything.
You said "anything coming out the west is just as much bullshit as Russia saving Ukraine from Nazi's"
That is not true.
It was only last week that the US government were paying tictokers to blame the increase in fuel prices on Russia.
Consume and obey.
Those are two great examples of free media working as it should.Well, it has been the west pushing video game footage as real front line videos, or maybe the ghost of Kiev, You know, the fighter pilot who shot down 6 enemy jets in an afternoon before going home to have an orgy with supermodels in his hot tub. The west are just as bad as anyone with the propaganda.
Well, it has been the west pushing video game footage as real front line videos, or maybe the ghost of Kiev, You know, the fighter pilot who shot down 6 enemy jets in an afternoon before going home to have an orgy with supermodels in his hot tub. The west are just as bad as anyone with the propaganda.
We know there is a lot of propaganda from the Ukrainian side.Yeah the Ghost of Kyiv thing is almost certainly untrue.
Assuming it is untrue, you really think a made up fighter pilot to boost morale is as bad as justifying the killing of women and children as ‘de-nazifying’?
And anyway the Ghost of Kyiv stuff came from Ukraine, not the West.
Here you go. Perfect example.Yeah the Ghost of Kyiv thing is almost certainly untrue.
Assuming it is untrue, you really think a made up fighter pilot to boost morale is as bad as justifying the killing of women and children as ‘de-nazifying’?
And anyway the Ghost of Kyiv stuff came from Ukraine, not the West.
The Ghurkas came back with pink ears rather than tanned trophies?As an aside, just had a browse through friendly fire incidents.
I just wonder what happened after the hour for them to realise they were shooting at the wrong people!
Maybe he was referring to Ukrainian tactics not RussianExample of the Russian side. Some military pundit over there has said that not only is the campaign going very well, but it will go down in history as a shining example of how all wars will be carried out in the future. That's how successful it is
Well, it is clearly not going to plan is it. Some stuff from the Russian side is absolutely unbelievable
True, but then Russian media don't broadcast anything negative about the regime there anyway, at any other time either.Role of the media in war always different. Russia and Ukraine aren't going to be broadcasting anything that shows them in a negative situation - for political and morale reasons.
It was only last week that the US government were paying tictokers to blame the increase in fuel prices on Russia.
Consume and obey.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?