Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no. (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter shmmeee
  • Start date Jan 8, 2014
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 9
Next
1 of 9 Next Last

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #1
http://www.skybluetrust.co.uk/index.php/the-news/329-trust-press-release-08012014

Information Concerning Talks Between Local Councils and CCFC

On 30th October 2013 Tim Fisher reported to a Supporters Consultative Group meeting that the Club were currently in discussions with 2 other councils and presenting the benefits and economic impact of a multi-purpose stadium. Both those councils instantly see the benefits.”

In his Sky TV interview on 20 December, Mark Labovitch said: “There are two local authorities involved. They each want an economic impact assessment to show the benefits that the stadium will bring to the area.”

As the Club have consistently declined to clarify where the proposed stadiums sites are, or even to confirm which two local authorities they have been discussing the matter with, the Trust have sent Freedom of Information Act requests to seven local authorities surrounding Coventry, to try to discover exactly what is going on. Those requests asked the Councils whether they had, since 1 January 2012, taken part in any discussions, meetings or correspondence with CCFC, Otium, SISU Capital or anyone acting on their behalf, regarding development proposals within the Council’s area relating to the building of a football stadium and/or any other facilities related to the business of the football club. We asked for details of any such discussions and the sites and proposals involved.

The requests were sent on 25 November 2013 and should, by law, have been answered by 23 December 2013.

Six Councils have responded:

Coventry City - no such discussions
Solihull – no such discussions
Hinckley and Bosworth – no such discussions
North Warwickshire – no such discussions
Warwick - no such discussions
Warwickshire – no such discussions

Response still awaited from Nuneaton and Bedworth but this is expected shortly

Rugby Council replied as follows:

"Rugby Borough Council can confirm that approximately three months ago the Leader of the Council and Executive Director met with representatives from Coventry City Football Club to discuss the club’s proposals to develop a Category 2 Academy training facility within the borough. The representatives of Coventry City Football Club were informed that the proposals were unacceptable to the council and there has been no communication with the club since that meeting."
Click to expand...
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #2
Bedworth it is then ????

Thanks for the good work.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #3
Nowt to do with me. Just saw it on NewsNow.

Agree though. Well done to everyone involved, another stone turned (or at least fresh meat for the forum).
 

jimmyhillsfanclub

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #4
Interesting that Nuneaton & Bedworth have not responded within the legal time frame.....20 working days I believe.
 

skybluejelly

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #5
But this also proves that the club are not lying and have made inquiries ...
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #6
jimmyhillsfanclub said:
Interesting that Nuneaton & Bedworth have not responded within the legal time frame.....20 working days I believe.
Click to expand...

Yep. 20 working days unless they ask for more time.

From the pres release it seems they might have as they say they expect it soon.
 
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #7
Proof of what we all knew. Anyone who believes in a new stadium is obviously suffering with stupidity issues.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #8
skybluejelly said:
But this also proves that the club are not lying and have made inquiries ...
Click to expand...

About a training ground.

To one authority.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #9
Should be a short meeting tomorrow then.
 

jimmyhillsfanclub

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #10
skybluejelly said:
But this also proves that the club are not lying and have made inquiries ...
Click to expand...

Not quite.....So far, It proves they made 1 enquiry about a training facility, not a stadium....
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #11
I would not assume that just because Nuneaton & Bedworth may have been approached that they would react positively. I would have thought confirmation from them will be shortly
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #12
To be honest. I'd have thought that side was less likely considering the proximity of another town, and of course an existing stadium.
 

CJ_covblaze

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #13
italiahorse said:
Bedworth it is then ????

Thanks for the good work.
Click to expand...

Lets not jump to conclusions. It could mean they've been busy with Christmas and New Year stuff. As soon as we're able to we will release the forthcoming response from N&B.
 

Warwickhunt

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #14
shmmeee said:
http://www.skybluetrust.co.uk/index.php/the-news/329-trust-press-release-08012014
Click to expand...
So why did you not wait until you got
Response from Nuneaton and Bedworth "ut this is expected shortly!" the two councils I would expect to have benn contacted they have not respnded yet! Anyway Knowing SISU the way we do they would have had a NDA(none disclosure agreement)in place
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #15
when we get it, someone should send this straight the to FL.
 

skybluejelly

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #16
I have said before .. A little bird in the masons told me that the club were eying the oakdale nursery opposite the speedway.. But spionkop said there were protected woods there so unlikely to get planning permission..looks like he was right.. But as you know once you have some sort of development on green/ brown belt land it's a lot easier to get more permission..and truth be told it would be a good investment if they got planning permission for the academy to go there
 

skyblueinBaku

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #17
ccfcway said:
when we get it, someone should send this straight the to FL.
Click to expand...
The FL will probably say they can't interfere.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #18
skybluejelly said:
But this also proves that the club are not lying and have made inquiries ...
Click to expand...

That's not right, it very clearly shows they have been lying. Two quotes about the new ground (not about a training ground)

Fisher "the Club were currently in discussions with 2 other councils and presenting the benefits and economic impact of a multi-purpose stadium. Both those councils instantly see the benefits.”

Labovitch “There are two local authorities involved. They each want an economic impact assessment to show the benefits that the stadium will bring to the area.”

With only one left to respond every other authority has said they haven't been spoken to about a new stadium so both of the above statements are outright lies.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #19
Warwickhunt said:
So why did you not wait until you got
Response from Nuneaton and Bedworth "ut this is expected shortly!" the two councils I would expect to have benn contacted they have not respnded yet! Anyway Knowing SISU the way we do they would have had a NDA(none disclosure agreement)in place
Click to expand...

If an NDA was in place the answer wouldn't have been "no discussions" it would've been "cannot comment".

N&B is one council.

They were waiting for all responses, people (me) were asking for the info earlier. I'm glad it's been released prior to the forum meeting, even though it's off limits to talk about that, it changes the mood a little.

Well done SBT I say.
 
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #20
Stop it. There wont be a new stadium. stop wasting our time. Concrete proof here so stop acting like thick people.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #21
chiefdave said:
That's not right, it very clearly shows they have been lying. Two quotes about the new ground (not about a training ground)

Fisher "the Club were currently in discussions with 2 other councils and presenting the benefits and economic impact of a multi-purpose stadium. Both those councils instantly see the benefits.”

Labovitch “There are two local authorities involved. They each want an economic impact assessment to show the benefits that the stadium will bring to the area.”

With only one left to respond every other authority has said they haven't been spoken to about a new stadium so both of the above statements are outright lies.
Click to expand...

Something to bring up at the stadium forum
 

Warwickhunt

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #22
skybluejelly said:
I have said before .. A little bird in the masons told me that the club were eying the oakdale nursery opposite the speedway.. But spionkop said there were protected woods there so unlikely to get planning permission..looks like he was right.. But as you know once you have some sort of development on green/ brown belt land it's a lot easier to get more permission..and truth be told it would be a good investment if they got planning permission for the academy to go there
Click to expand...
Now your thinking outside of the Box - you will notice that Rugby only quoted as saying that SISU had applied for a grade 2 Training Academy which they turned down
 
S

Specs WT-R75

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #23
Is there a difference between council and local authority? Sorry to be a numpty, just wondering if a council is made up by several LAs?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #24
The club has been in discussion with an authority then.

Are we sure that the dicussion wasn't about converting Ryton into the training facility?
 
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #25
even if N + B said yes sisu have enquired about a shed stadium then A this means nothing as I could enquire in theory therefore means nothing and B I though ML AND TF quoted 2 sites. Another porky? surely not. Pricks
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #26
Specs WT-R75 said:
Is there a difference between council and local authority? Sorry to be a numpty, just wondering if a council is made up by several LAs?
Click to expand...

Same thing.
 
K

kingharvest

New Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #27
Specs WT-R75 said:
Is there a difference between council and local authority? Sorry to be a numpty, just wondering if a council is made up by several LAs?
Click to expand...

nah - same thing
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #28
skybluejelly said:
But this also proves that the club are not lying and have made inquiries ...
Click to expand...

They said they were in discussions with 2 local authorities.
This proves they were not and that the only discussions they had was with Rugby over a training ground.

If people still think this will happen you are brainwashed.
Will the people at the stadium forum happen to mention this or will the bleat back in admiration?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #29
fernandopartridge said:
The club has been in discussion with an authority then.
Click to expand...

Only if N&B respond and say yes, even then it would only be one and Fisher and Labovich have both clearly stated they've been talking to two. The response from Rugby said they'd been spoken to about a training ground not a stadium. It also said it was unacceptable where Fisher and Labovich had said the two councils they had talked to were very interested and wanted economic impact assesments done.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #30
Specs WT-R75 said:
Is there a difference between council and local authority? Sorry to be a numpty, just wondering if a council is made up by several LAs?
Click to expand...

No, I've recently asked for the same information so have been through the process. Didn't ask Hinckley though.
 
S

Specs WT-R75

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #31
fernandopartridge said:
Same thing.
Click to expand...

So this means that either....

1) Sisu have lied
2) If N&B is one council then they are looking further afield than councils bordering Coventry (for example Hinkley etc) -- time for more FOI requests??
3) Councils have lied about their FOI responses, or have made mistakes...

I guess more likely to be 1+2 than 3....
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #32
think we need to keep in mind what was asked of each of the authorities concerned

Those requests asked the Councils whether they had, since 1 January 2012, taken part in any discussions, meetings or correspondence with CCFC, Otium, SISU Capital or anyone acting on their behalf, regarding development proposals within the Council’s area relating to the building of a football stadium and/or any other facilities related to the business of the football club.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #33
Specs WT-R75 said:
If N&B is one council then they are looking further afield than councils bordering Coventry (for example Hinkley etc)
Click to expand...

Does anywhere else come within the "9 miles of the council house" or are we now looking at moving even further away from the city. When does it stop even being in the "Coventry area"?
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #34
Sky Blue Pete said:
Something to bring up at the stadium forum
Click to expand...

Crucial I think.
If you continue without asking you can't be the full ticket.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 8, 2014
  • #35
chiefdave said:
Does anywhere else come within the "9 miles of the council house" or are we now looking at moving even further away from the city. When does it stop even being in the "Coventry area"?
Click to expand...

They have asked all of them plus Hinckley which is outside.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 9
Next
1 of 9 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?