Trump is my favourite comedian of the year already (11 Viewers)

mmttww

Well-Known Member
The point I was making is that while hidden edits of quotes at Panorama and Newsnight has you hopping up and down about a credibility crisis, examples of other journalists doing the same thing (if not making quotes up entirely) doesn’t seem to bother you at all?

maybe the Mail journalist has a Swiss passport?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Look I get it, ho ho ho, actually he can’t resign because technically he already did etc etc

The point I was making is that while hidden edits of quotes at Panorama and Newsnight has you hopping up and down about a credibility crisis, examples of other journalists doing the same thing (if not making quotes up entirely) doesn’t seem to bother you at all?
‘I already don’t like the BBC’
‘I already like Trump’

Trump gets upset by the BBC

Excited Happy Children GIF by Earth Hour
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Look I get it, ho ho ho, actually he can’t resign because technically he already did etc etc

The point I was making is that while hidden edits of quotes at Panorama and Newsnight has you hopping up and down about a credibility crisis, examples of other journalists doing the same thing (if not making quotes up entirely) doesn’t seem to bother you at all?

Im hardly hopping up and down I say the standards of a tax funded organisation which has as a code of conduct geared to impartiality has to do better then - I don’t know some sad rag which brags people like Will Self as a main contributor

if you see it differently that’s your choice
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Im hardly hopping up and down I say the standards of a tax funded organisation which has as a code of conduct geared to impartiality has to do better then - I don’t know some sad rag which brags people like Will Self as a main contributor

if you see it differently that’s your choice
Oh dear

You sound quite triggered
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Oh dear

You sound quite triggered

If you can’t see the difference between Will Self and Alistair Campbell and the BBC then I’ll leave you to it
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
If you can’t see the difference between Will Self and Alistair Campbell and the BBC then I’ll leave you to it
You’re free to ramble on about Self, Campbell and various other people I haven’t mentioned - my original post was about Michael Prescott. He was supposed to be acting as an independent arbiter of the BBC’s editorial standards, but was in fact guilty of the very same sloppiness that ended up with the DG and the Head of News getting axed via his memo.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
You’re free to ramble on about Self, Campbell and various other people I haven’t mentioned - my original post was about Michael Prescott. He was supposed to be acting as an independent arbiter of the BBC’s editorial standards, but was in fact guilty of the very same sloppiness that ended up with the DG and the Head of News getting axed via his memo.

I’m talking about your source
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
It takes quite the set of mental gymnastics to not care about child sex abuse if it happens in the US but get really worked up about the BBC misrepresenting something that happens in the US.

Why are the two subjects related?

This is purely to do with the BBC not acting with impartiality?

You will be making jokes about child victims touching parts of a doll again soon.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I also don’t actually agree with the likes of Lee Anderson and Farage have their own slots on a news channel. They certainly should not be paid.

There is a difference as it’s preaching to the converted but I suspect - rightly - there would be outrage if one of them presented newsnight or was allowed in the editing room.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Why are the two subjects related?

This is purely to do with the BBC not acting with impartiality?

You will be making jokes about child victims touching parts of a doll again soon.
Can I just ask why a keen eyed observer such as yourself wasn’t in uproar about such scandalous behaviour at the BBC when the episode aired?
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Why are the two subjects related?

This is purely to do with the BBC not acting with impartiality?

You will be making jokes about child victims touching parts of a doll again soon.

Because you claim you don't care what happens in the US so why are you upset that the BBC have misrepresented something from the US.

This is the problem when you take such daft and sometimes extreme views in the name of being such a contrarion - it often comes back to make you look even more stupid.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Because you claim you don't care what happens in the US so why are you upset that the BBC have misrepresented something from the US.

This is the problem when you take such daft and sometimes extreme views in the name of being such a contrarion - it often comes back to make you look even more stupid.

I fail to see how it makes me look stupid when two of the most senior people have resigned and the culture secretary has said questions need to be asked.

So it’s an overreaction - yet heads have rolled?

who do I look stupid to? You? lol
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Can I just ask why a keen eyed observer such as yourself wasn’t in uproar about such scandalous behaviour at the BBC when the episode aired?

Im not a keen eyed observer and im not in uproar.

Editing a programme is a breach of the licence payer ethics and standards was a totally stupid thing to do.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SBT

Grendel

Well-Known Member
When was the programme broadcast and when did people start giving a shit?

Well I assume when the person given a job on an ethics advisory board highlighted it - the issue here you have and refuse to comment on is why the corporation have said it’s wrong and two senior people have resigned.

Why if there was nothing wrong at all?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
If anyone could edit this into a sentence that makes sense then that would be great

Oh dear again - I suspect you have some resentment against Prescott? Want to share to us the resentment?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Well I assume when the person given a job on an ethics advisory board highlighted it - the issue here you have and refuse to comment on is why the corporation have said it’s wrong and two senior people have resigned.

Why if there was nothing wrong at all?
They’re under pressure from the most powerful man on the planet. He has extorted big money from US media organisations over similar matters or just broadcasting things he dislikes. If those cases went to court he would lose, but companies are scared of being shut down so pay him money to leave them alone.

Of course you and the other boomers on here snigger, but that is blatant intimidation of the press and authoritarianism. This was apparently an egregious misrepresentation of his speech yet nobody commented when it was broadcast. Why not?
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Oh dear again - I suspect you have some resentment against Prescott? Want to share to us the resentment?
“Oh dear” again ole ole

I think my “resentment” is more like confusion that a right-wing crank journalist can torpedo the BBC’s credibility for impartiality with a memo that’s guilty of the precise same editorial sloppiness that he’s complaining about. Quite funny that you’re suggesting that I must know him personally though!
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
“Oh dear” again ole ole

I think my “resentment” is more like confusion that a right-wing crank journalist can torpedo the BBC’s credibility for impartiality with a memo that’s guilty of the precise same editorial sloppiness that he’s complaining about. Quite funny that you’re suggesting that I must know him personally though!

Sorry I thought it was a frustration he’s been rather successful from very humble journalist beginnings - namely the Coventry Evening Telegraph
 

Kneeza

Well-Known Member
They’re under pressure from the most powerful man on the planet. He has extorted big money from US media organisations over similar matters or just broadcasting things he dislikes. If those cases went to court he would lose, but companies are scared of being shut down so pay him money to leave them alone.

Of course you and the other boomers on here snigger, but that is blatant intimidation of the press and authoritarianism. This was apparently an egregious misrepresentation of his speech yet nobody commented when it was broadcast. Why not?
Not this 'boomer', ta very much.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Top