Trump is my favourite comedian of the year already (19 Viewers)

Sky_Blue_Dreamer · Nov 11, 2020

Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
Sure, so if that is the case then it will get thrown out quite quickly and Trump will be on his way.

If it isn't investigated there will be shit throwing from both sides. Look how much of a mess that can cause. It needs to be cleared up

A penalty is not given and Klopp is going mental. Shall we check VAR? The ball clearly hit his chest, not his arm. Klopp then shuts up. Except for the fact this is far more serious, and with a bloke who is going to cause mega disruption. As I also mentioned earlier, the more he is discredited now, the less chance he has to get into power in four years time.

I'm not worrying about the investigation chucking up anything really in Trump's favour, but clearly some people are.

I'm fine with it being investigated (but that still won't stop the hardcore claiming the courts are 'in' on the conspiracy and are covering it up). But in those instances the Rep's and Trump must be made to pay ALL the costs of both sides in the dispute plus damages. Plus if there isn't evidence shouldn't Trump and those backing him also be tried for crimes against the US? If unproven what they're alleging is a form of treason as he's working against the interests of the United States?

SBT · Nov 11, 2020

Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
I couldn't really care less who calls for it to be fair. If it was the other way round you would be screaming for it anyway. Do you care about democracy, or just your side winning? It doesn't look good.

If the investigation comes back, good. Hopefully Trump will never be seen in politics again. If it did come back and there was something off however, then I think the general public over there have a right to know. The fact you don't agree with that is mental.

Also, low jibe about 9/11.

I don't agree with wasting time, energy and money investigating stuff that exists only in the heads of conspiracy theorists. Four years ago it was a much closer election, and I didn't scream for an investigation then, and nor did most other people - funny that.

You want to investigate imaginary stuff because your favourite media channels told you so? Fine, but it comes with a price. The talk about 9/11 isn't from me, it's from the official 9/11 Commission and George W Bush's chief of staff: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...1a960a-239f-11eb-8672-c281c7a2c96e_story.html

shmmeee · Nov 11, 2020

Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
I couldn't really care less who calls for it to be fair. If it was the other way round you would be screaming for it anyway. Do you care about democracy, or just your side winning? It doesn't look good.

If the investigation comes back, good. Hopefully Trump will never be seen in politics again. If it did come back and there was something off however, then I think the general public over there have a right to know. The fact you don't agree with that is mental.

Also, low jibe about 9/11.

There is no evidence of fraud. This is a narcissistic tantrum not a serious accusation. Delays to the transition certainly harm the working of a country. Politics actually matters off Twitter.

Sick Boy · Nov 11, 2020

The problem is that he’s creating mistrust in democracy both now and in the future and it’s already being lapped up by his followers...the guy and his ilk in Europe are a genuine danger to the western world and democracy in general.

clint van damme · Nov 11, 2020

Sick Boy said:
The problem is that he’s creating mistrust in democracy both now and in the future and it’s already being lapped up by his followers...the guy and his ilk in Europe are a genuine danger to the western world and democracy in general.

he claimed fraud in the election he won, he said fraud gave Clinton the popular vote. He's a spoilt baby and the most unstatesman like world leader this side of the likes of Orban, Bolsanaro, Modi and the like.

Sky Blue Pete · Nov 11, 2020

Righteousness v Satan

Redirect Notice

www.google.co.uk

Otis · Nov 11, 2020

Sick Boy said:
The problem is that he’s creating mistrust in democracy both now and in the future and it’s already being lapped up by his followers...the guy and his ilk in Europe are a genuine danger to the western world and democracy in general.

This is so true. Look what he's done to us all and some of us so willingly lap it all up.

Otis · Nov 11, 2020

Sky Blue Pete said:
Righteousness v Satan

Redirect Notice

www.google.co.uk

Already been done, but still worth another wow.

Sky Blue Pete · Nov 11, 2020

Otis said:
Already been done, but still worth another wow.

Ah sorry

Sky_Blue_Dreamer · Nov 11, 2020

clint van damme said:
he claimed fraud in the election he won, he said fraud gave Clinton the popular vote. He's a spoilt baby and the most unstatesman like world leader this side of the likes of Orban, Bolsanaro, Modi and the like.

Look at Trump's past.

Trump university was sued - courts were rigged against him
He didn't win an Emmy - it was rigged
He didn't beat Clinton in the popular vote - it was rigged
He even claimed the early Rep primaries were rigged against him cos he lost them.

So what do you think he does when he loses the election.....?

It's got fuck all to do with fraud and everything to do with his mentality that can't accept he could ever lose cos he's great and amazing and popular. If something doesn't go his way he says it's obviously rigged and throws a tantrum. Despite nothing in any of those above cases suggesting it was rigged against him and many would argue in the university case it was rigged in his favour cos ordinarily a person would've spent a long time in prison for that.

If this election was rigged then it was either an incredibly elaborate scheme to put people off the scent involving thousands of people to make it look like the shittest rigging ever. Trump did MUCH BETTER than the polls suggested, so the pollsters were in on it to make it look less suspicious. They rigged it so they ddn't get control of the senate so it didn't look as obvious. They also rigged it so that Trump won some swing states he was expected to lose like Florida with a significant number of electoral votes while making sure the numbers in others were so close it could've gone against them.

Yet all of this to his supporters is more likely than the obvious reason which is it's just a man-baby doing what he's done his entire life every time something doesn't go his way. Hundreds of people said this is what would happen. I said it's what would happen and I'm no political insider or genius.

Evo1883 · Nov 11, 2020

Kamala Harris says America "will once again stand with civil society and pro-democracy partners in Syria and help advance a political settlement where the Syrian people have a voice.”

Oh goody back to meddling and Conflict

We've been here before

Otis · Nov 11, 2020

I don't like meddling, but pro-democracy has to be good thing.

Depends what she means by "stand" I guess.

Evo1883 · Nov 11, 2020

Otis said:
I don't like meddling, but pro-democracy has to be good thing.

Depends what she means by "stand" I guess.

We all know how America tries to force democracy on countries, I definitely Predict far more conflict under Biden and Harris.
Biden already has history and Harris is no angel.

The middle East will erupt again over the next few years

It's out with the old and in with the familiar I'm afraid.

Just a guess, people won't like these 2 very much either by the time they've finished

skybluetony176 · Nov 11, 2020

Otis said:
I don't like meddling, but pro-democracy has to be good thing.

Depends what she means by "stand" I guess.

Not sure AlQaeda are pro democracy either so not sure how someone has gone from pro democracy partners straight to AlQaeda.

Otis · Nov 11, 2020

shmmeee · Nov 11, 2020

Evo1883 said:
Kamala Harris says America "will once again stand with civil society and pro-democracy partners in Syria and help advance a political settlement where the Syrian people have a voice.”

Oh goody back to meddling and Conflict View attachment 17498

We've been here before

Believing InfoWars loons who make random statements based on articles that don’t even mention Syria?

Come on man, don’t amplify these sort of nuts:

Evo1883 · Nov 12, 2020

shmmeee said:
Believing InfoWars loons who make random statements based on articles that don’t even mention Syria?

Come on man, don’t amplify these sort of nuts:

View attachment 17500

Fair enough take her quote out, the statement was made by Harris... I didn't know who that other girl was.

shmmeee · Nov 12, 2020

Evo1883 said:
Fair enough take her quote out, the statement was made by Harris... I didn't know who that other girl was.

Here’s the full quote:

“In Syria, Joe and I will once again stand with civil society and pro-democracy partners in Syria, and help advance a political settlement where the Syrian people have a voice. We will work to protect the most vulnerable Syrians and lead the global coalition to defeat ISIS. And instead of standing by as the government of Saudi Arabia pursues disastrous, dangerous policies, including the ongoing war in Yemen, we will reassess the U.S. relationship with Saudi Arabia and end support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen.”

Seems like fairly bland stuff TBH. Hardly calling for funding Al Queda.

Sky Blue Pete · Nov 12, 2020

Can’t believe this will be resolved peacefully. It’s absolutely bizarre

SBT · Nov 12, 2020

Sky Blue Pete said:
Can’t believe this will be resolved peacefully. It’s absolutely bizarre

We're not talking about another civil war here. This will end peacefully. Were it not for two run-off elections in Georgia it already would have.

Brighton Sky Blue · Nov 12, 2020

shmmeee said:
Here’s the full quote:

“In Syria, Joe and I will once again stand with civil society and pro-democracy partners in Syria, and help advance a political settlement where the Syrian people have a voice. We will work to protect the most vulnerable Syrians and lead the global coalition to defeat ISIS. And instead of standing by as the government of Saudi Arabia pursues disastrous, dangerous policies, including the ongoing war in Yemen, we will reassess the U.S. relationship with Saudi Arabia and end support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen.”

Seems like fairly bland stuff TBH. Hardly calling for funding Al Queda.

The early soundings, though flipping obvious after the mess the orange man created, look pretty encouraging I would say.

Skybluefaz · Nov 12, 2020

Fuck me he's a tiresome prick. DATA ANALYSIS though. So must be true

Sky Blue Pete · Nov 12, 2020

Skybluefaz said:
Fuck me he's a tiresome prick. DATA ANALYSIS though. So must be true

Oh well that proves it. Lol

chiefdave · Nov 12, 2020

Just had a quick look at Trumps twitter feed. What an absolute shitshow.

Sky Blue Pete · Nov 12, 2020

Where the tweet originated from

We are now post truth

wingy · Nov 12, 2020

I hope he carries right on into January.
The sight of secret service escorting him off the premises ,arm up his back would be priceless.
Maybe Pompeo could arrange for the Lord to beam up his disciple.

David O'Day · Nov 12, 2020

wingy said:
I hope he carries right on into January.
The sight of secret service escorting him off the premises ,arm up his back would be priceless.
Maybe Pompeo could arrange for the Lord to beam up his disciple.

dragged out the front door

SeaSeeEffCee · Nov 12, 2020

Skybluefaz said:
Fuck me he's a tiresome prick. DATA ANALYSIS though. So must be true

That's enough evidence for Paxman, wrap it up, it's over for Biden.

Brighton Sky Blue · Nov 12, 2020

SeaSeeEffCee said:
That's enough evidence for Paxman, wrap it up, it's over for Biden.

It's a fascinating case study in how the ultimate narcissist deals with the ultimate public defeat

ajsccfc · Nov 12, 2020

If only Twitter was about in the 60s, just have Geoff Hurst screaming IT WAS OVER THE LINE, BOBBY MOORE CONFIRMED IT and we'd then just claim the 1970 World Cup as ours

Sky Blue Pete · Nov 13, 2020

US election security officials reject Trump's fraud claims

A statement says there is no evidence of any "vote deletion", hours after Mr Trump makes that exact claim.

www.bbc.co.uk

Otis · Nov 13, 2020

Sky Blue Pete said:
US election security officials reject Trump's fraud claims

A statement says there is no evidence of any "vote deletion", hours after Mr Trump makes that exact claim.

www.bbc.co.uk

Okay, but then how do we know they also aren't evil lefties trying to cheat the system?

Sky Blue Pete · Nov 13, 2020

Otis said:
Okay, but then how do we know they also aren't evil lefties trying to cheat the system?

Oh they are exactly that that’s why they’ve been asked to leave their posts. Obama ratcheting things up too isn’t he? I think on balance he’s right and there really is no turning back if democracy is at stake and the enemies of the voting system win.

Are there enough people brave enough to stand in President trumps way? Probably

tisza · Nov 13, 2020

Sky Blue Pete said:
Are there enough people brave enough to stand in President trumps way? Probably

Republican leaders/representatives are afraid of upsetting Trump "fanbase" so few are prepared to acknowledge the election result. They're also trying to figure out how they can secure the Georgia senate seats in January in order to limit a Biden presidency. They need to make sure Trump supporters turn out in numbers for those votes and not stay away from the polls

Sky Blue Pete · Nov 13, 2020

tisza said:
Republican leaders/representatives are afraid of upsetting Trump "fanbase" so few are prepared to acknowledge the election result. They're also trying to figure out how they can secure the Georgia senate seats in January in order to limit a Biden presidency. They need to make sure Trump supporters turn out in numbers for those votes and not stay away from the polls

Whatever the result it won’t be free and fair I’m sure unless it agrees with what a certain President trump would like

Trump is my favourite comedian of the year already (19 Viewers)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Super Moderator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency