If Vance gets in next, I think he will actually be even more antagonistic towards Europe in general.
Vance would be a nightmare, very little chance he carks it from old age any time soon either.
I think the Republicans have a tall order winning the next election tbhYep definitely.
At the moment I think Trump is a useful idiot for people to get the ball rolling on a lot of this nasty shit and when the time is right he'll be booted out for Vance and things will get even worse. He's backed by Peter Thiel and he is shady as fuck.
If Trump goes after 2 years then Vance gets the remainder of the term plus two more terms = 10 years as president.
Hence why i said 'also', as it's likely not the primary motivation for this fiasco. The guy does have a record for lots of words and bluster with nothing concrete actually happening, which would lend some credence to him wanting to keep headlines elsewhere.The notion he’s going to look at invading a NATO country to avoid “looking over there” is pretty extreme
'Influencer' FFSSeems like things heating up in Minneapolis. A right wing influencer planned a rally where he promised to burn a Koran - it didn’t end well.
'Influencer' FFS
Set fire to a Union Jack in this country and see how it goes.Well, I guess the reaction completely validated his point in fairness.
Well, I guess the reaction completely validated his point in fairness.
???She played a stupid game and won the prize, unfortunately.
Set fire to a Union Jack in this country and see how it goes.
Sure, how about setting fire to a bible in the Bible Belt?A Union Jack to the UK, and a Koran to the USA should not be a straight comparison.
How so? Dickhead plans to do something deliberately incendiary and is met by disorder. I suppose it’s what Trump would refer to as FAFO.
Sure, how about setting fire to a bible in the Bible Belt?
Incredible how you’ve gone from “play stupid games etc” to claiming that burning a book is some kind of heroic intellectual exercise in a matter of days.Yeah, I mean it is unnecessary move and he was likely to get into hot water, but if you a burning a holy book to demonstrate a problem with free speech around it, and then you get beaten up, then it more or less writes itself.
It isn’t a Christian one either, it’s a secular nation. Not a theocracy.I know what you are trying to get at, but this isn't correct.
That's like saying it would be more like burning a Koran on the streets of Jeddah. This was in the United States. It isn't a Muslim country.
It isn’t a Christian one either, it’s a secular nation. Not a theocracy.
Don't think so. If you made a show of burning the Bible anywhere with evangelical Christians around, you probably know what would happen.You've got completely lost on this.
Yeah, I mean it is unnecessary move and he was likely to get into hot water, but if you a burning a holy book to demonstrate a problem with free speech around it, and then you get beaten up, then it more or less writes itself.
The problem we've got is that we have entire infrastructure dependent on it, eg cloud hosting providersHe really is a narcissistic twat…I think the whole,e of Europe should make a combined effort to stop buying anything American ..even if it’s just for a month , cancel all streaming subscriptions for a month ,no fast food outlets boycott American holidays .. see how his ten percent tariffs go then
Pardoned January 6 protester Jake Lang staged an antisemitic demonstration on Sunday outside of the headquarters of the pro-Israel lobby AIPAC, where he threw chocolate coins and gave a Nazi salute.
During the protest on Sunday, Lang also made a series of racist remarks towards immigrant children, including that “they’re anchor babies sent in as chemical weapons by the Talmudic Jews.”
Dear Ambassador:
President Trump has asked that the following message, shared with Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, be forwarded to your [named head of government/state]
“Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a “right of ownership” anyway? There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT”
Surely someone has made that up.
amazingly noSurely someone has made that up.
“The European leaders will come around. And they will understand that they need to be under the US security umbrella. What would happen in Ukraine if the US pulled its support out? The whole thing would collapse.”
We had some posters on here praising his intelligence not that long ago.
How does complaining you're weak and vulnerable unless you get control of Greenland project strength?As I predicted a few days ago...
US treasury secretary Scott Bessent also pursued a similar line, telling NBC broadcaster that “Europeans project weakness, US projects strength.”
“The president believes enhanced security is not possible without Greenland being part of the US,” he said.
In further escalation, he also appeared to link the future of Greenland with the continuation of the US support for Ukraine.
He said:
Trump says ‘no comment’ when asked if he would seize Greenland by force – as it happened
The US president said he would “100%” push ahead with his plans to hit European nations with tarrifs if he doesn’t get Greenlandwww.theguardian.com
A criminal gang in the White HouseHe’s just an utter c**t and has no idea the shit he is unleashing on our world
These are the same people who say they don't want Russia as a neighbour...when they're only 4Km apart.How does complaining you're weak and vulnerable unless you get control of Greenland project strength?
Believes is an interesting choice of word there. I'm guessing there wasn't a follow up question asking Bessent if he agreed with the president.“The president believes enhanced security is not possible without Greenland being part of the US,”
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?