mmttww
Well-Known Member
You're right,
Stirring what up? Having a different opinion to you? Calling you out for saying our flags are racist.
Boosh dom? That all you’ve got, me and him laugh at it regularly tbh it’s quite embarrassing on your behalf. You have been crying about people putting flags up for weeks so stop bullshitting, you just hate the fact someone disagrees with you and calls you outYou're right,booshDom. You don't stir things up. Definitely not dumping rage bait posts (which you delete when you spot that they're obvs. bullsh*t) and relentlessly jumping on other people's chats to bait them directly if your X nonsense didn't work. I've not said flags are racist, but nice try.
Crying and bitching? Hmm.
My dear nonce fanboy (I do hope you don't mind me calling you that), literally all you've ever done here is whine.
But the 'libs' etc etc. quick somebody, call the Waaah-mbulance.
Calls me a nonce fanboy for things in the media that have no evidence yet doesn’t want women to have safe spaces and men in women’s toilets. Hahahaha fucking hell that’s so weirdSays the guy who thinks women should not be allowed safe spaces. Just fuck off you weirdo.
crying about people putting flags up for weeks
Nonce fanboy, you think defending women's right are right wing and want men in women’s toilets. That’s about as weird as it gets, time to take a good look in the mirror
Just hope I don’t annoy you too much so you get angry and message me like you did with my mate, what a lovely gesture that was of you he appreciated itI've found it pretty funny tbf, boosh. Video you posted and deleted earlier of someone dropping their phone while running after someone and screaming 'c*nt' at them was a LOL.
You literally don’t want safe women spaces and men in women’s toilets…..creep. I think that’s slightly more weird than supporting the president of the USA, also all them claims have no evidenceYou're literally the fanboy of a nonce who just set back women's rights over their own bodies by decades.
The man who also said, "Just grab them by the pussy".
Oh, bless, you're too stupid to realise what an absolute hypocrite you are.
It's all a bit embarrassing really, you were doing better when you just posted pictures of your favourite nonce dancing, maybe you should go back to that.
Just hope I don’t annoy you too much..
What it’s a forum, I can reply to someone if I want? You trying to imply that it should only be one way on here?It's hard to get annoyed by someone that's a figment of someone else's imagination. It would be cool if people could actually talk about stuff without your act taking up this much space but no one's stopping you.
You trying to imply that it should only be one way
Calls me a nonce fanboy for things in the media that have no evidence yet doesn’t want women to have safe spaces and men in women’s toilets. Hahahaha fucking hell that’s so weird
You literally don’t want safe women spaces and men in women’s toilets…..creep. I think that’s slightly more weird than supporting the president of the USA, also all them claims have no evidence
Mate, I'm sorry if it hurts, but you are a nonce fanboy, the evidence is quite clear and it isn't going away. What's weird are the contortions you're going through to try to justify it - you'll do yourself an injury mate.
As for supporting women's rights, your favourite nonce isn't big on that either, so either you're pretending that you care about women's rights, or you're pretending to support nonce's approach to them by denying them rights to their own bodies and sexually assaulting them.
Simple question, which is it?
Wow some sad fucker on a football forum called ‘duffer’ called me thick, really hurt my feelings you have I don’t know what I’ll do with myself! Tbh I know you are a clown because you’ve put @Grendel on ignore because he always calls you outWhere have I said anything of the sort?
As for nonce, what he's said and done are literally a matter of record, you lunatic.
I'm coming to the conclusion that you're just a bit, well, thick and maybe I'm being cruel to you by exposing it on here. Must be terrible for your self-esteem.
Yes it's not nice being told that you're a child rape sympathiser is it?Says the guy who thinks women should not be allowed safe spaces. Just fuck off you weirdo.
Yes it's not nice being told that you're a child rape sympathiser is it?
'Stop being so over sensitive'.
Did you miss this one the other day?You're literally the fanboy of a nonce who just set back women's rights over their own bodies by decades.
The man who also said, "Just grab them by the pussy".
Oh, bless, you're too stupid to realise what an absolute hypocrite you are.
It's all a bit embarrassing really, you were doing better when you just posted pictures of your favourite nonce dancing, maybe you should go back to that.
Trump suggests domestic violence should not be counted in official crime statistics
'Nonce fanboy' no?I don’t think I have been accused of such?
Did you miss this one the other day?
Did you miss this one the other day?
During remarks, Trump said that crime statistics would be lower if "lesser" crimes such as domestic violence were not counted.
"And much lesser things, things that take place in the home, they call crime. You know, they'll do anything they can to find something. If a man has a little fight with the wife, they say 'this was a crime, see,' so now I can't claim 100%," Trump said.
Wow some sad fucker on a football forum called ‘duffer’ called me thick, really hurt my feelings you have I don’t know what I’ll do with myself! Tbh I know you are a clown because you’ve put @Grendel on ignore because he always calls you out
Very creepy strange individualNaah, I've put him on ignore because he's a tedious WUM.
I tried, I really did, but in the end it was just too boring to deal with.
Pity, because I sensed there was a vague glimmer of intelligence there at least. Ho hum.
You're comedy gold though, so you're safe, nonce fanboy.
Reading your posts is like watching those fail videos on YouTube. You can't believe some people are so dangerously stupid, and yet there they go, sawing off the branch they're sitting on whilst gurning for the camera.
It's sad, scary, and yet hilarious and utterly compelling. Keep 'em coming, nonce fanboy. x
That’s a different argument though. Fact is she did it, the evidence was overwhelming. Her sentence was well within the guidelines for her crime, she didn’t even get the maximum sentence that she could have had. Given the weight of evidence against her pleading guilty was good advice evident by the fact she didn’t get the maximum sentence which is normally the reserve of people who plead not guilty despite the weight of evidence against them.
If you’re saying that the sentencing was harsh compared to other crimes then the argument should be that the sentencing guidelines are wrong not that she’s some sort of victim. If you can’t do the time etc
One pleaded guilty and one was found not guilty by a jury of their peers don’t fall for the two tier shit
He hasn't been charged yet, so no.Do you think he broke the law Earlsdon?
Who was the tweet aimed at? No one specifically. It was an unfunny joke. Using your own logic, anyone who says 'punch a fascist in the face' would also constitute incitement. This, of course, would be ridiculous and a curtailment of free speech.Just to nip briefly back to this, let's not underplay what Linehan tweeted. In essence he said that anyone who comes across a trans women in a women's toilets, should attack them (punch them in the balls), just for being a trans woman - no other justification being required.
That statement would appear to be incitement to violence, a criminal offence.
Whether you like it or not, whether you agree with him or not, is academic. The police have a duty to enforce the law, so arresting him is not in itself a stupid act.
Whether it required five officers is a different matter, but the arrest was wholly legitimate.
The fact he's now claiming it was a joke, after a long history of strident anti-trans hatred and activism, looks a bit pathetic to me. At least the people getting arrested for peacefully holding up placards aren't pretending that they are just doing it as a joke.
Anyway, back to the main story of the day. Trump being outed as a nonce. Let's not forget to keep hanging that around the necks of his fanboys, it's just too much fun to miss.
a 31 month sentence for a deleted tweet (however distasteful) should not outrank violent crime. At the same time, this Labour government was responsible for releasing seasoned criminals early and new criminals convicted actual violent crimes given more lenient sentence is ridiculous to most people.
I am deeply uncomfortable that the tories put the legislation that meant Lucy Connolly and others like her serve significant time in jail for what they wrote or said not for what they didI’d wait until this has played out properly because Lucy Connolly is supposedly considering legal action against the police. The jist of it being that a) the misrepresented what she said to the CPS and b) manipulated her into pleading guilty. A police corruption unit is investigating statements she made. All that aside, it’s obvious that some of the sentences dished out to protesters last summer were disproportionately harsh. Again, compare that to some of the things chanted and disorder at pro-Palestine demos too. Starmer politically wanted to nip the disorder in the butt and show she was ‘tough’ in the face of the protest
Pete, Tony, a 31 month sentence for a deleted tweet (however distasteful) should not outrank violent crime. At the same time, this Labour government was responsible for releasing seasoned criminals early and new criminals convicted actual violent crimes given more lenient sentence is ridiculous to most people.
He hasn't been charged yet, so no.
Who was the tweet aimed at? No one specifically. It was an unfunny joke. Using your own logic, anyone who says 'punch a fascist in the face' would also constitute incitement. This, of course, would be ridiculous and a curtailment of free speech.
The man hasn't been charged with an offence (yet) so as of right now, there is no crime to answer for. What I would say, you may champion this example but the law its current form could be flipped and used against you. For example, should the police arrest the hundreds of people tweeting violent threats to JK Rowling (or anyone)?
What do you feel would have been an appropriate sentence based on the current sentencing guidelines for a category A1 offence taking into account the fact she did not initially plead guilty and therefore would not be eligible for the full reduction for a guilty plea?Pete, Tony, a 31 month sentence for a deleted tweet (however distasteful) should not outrank violent crime. At the same time, this Labour government was responsible for releasing seasoned criminals early and new criminals convicted actual violent crimes given more lenient sentence is ridiculous to most people.
As you should be, my fundamental premise that when it comes to freedom of speech, all speech is protected.I am deeply uncomfortable that the tories put the legislation that meant Lucy Connolly and others like her serve significant time in jail for what they wrote or said not for what they did
This is the problem. The legislation exists and is being applied.I am deeply uncomfortable that the tories put the legislation that meant Lucy Connolly and others like her serve significant time in jail for what they wrote or said not for what they did
Even in the US there are limitations, though just for libel/defamation I think. I agree with the second sentence though for sure.As you should be, my fundamental premise that when it comes to freedom of speech, all speech is protected.
It’s perverse that speech, at any level, can be punished harsher than actual violent crimes.
Which is reasonable as that’s the only speech that can cause “harm”.Even in the US there are limitations, though just for libel/defamation I think. I agree with the second sentence though for sure.
I would say death threats or wishing death or violence on specific people falls into that category too, I suppose it depends on how much of a free speech absolutist someone is.Which is reasonable as that’s the only speech that can cause “harm”.
The people defending this with the line ‘it’s the law’ seem to not identify that the problem is the laws themself. They could easily be weaponised to prosecute people in other ways.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?