You’re a big NATO guy now, huh?
Not sure but lavrov may have also.
I was going to say France actually: Macron: US strikes on Iran aren’t legalLol - all I ask is who agrees with your indignation? Pakistan possibly?
Not going well is it?
What is the French for 'contrarian'?I was going to say France actually: Macron: US strikes on Iran aren’t legal
Anyone else got deja vu?
I was going to say France actually: Macron: US strikes on Iran aren’t legal
Anyone else got deja vu?
What is the French for 'contrarian'?
Ah, Tulsi Gabbard was just lying a short while ago then.it’s surely you being contrarian as no one thinks Iran do not pose a nuclear threat?
So if I have this right, if enough countries nod along and keep schtum when the US bombs another country, that’s good enough for you?Is Mr Macron speaking for himself and his opinion? An opinion that’s been discredited by NATO?
Come on is that all you’ve got?
Try again
Iran is the unpopular kid in the playground, so it's only fair that the chief bullies get to beat him up and ask for his lunch money to make them stop.So if I have this right, if enough countries nod along and keep schtum when the US bombs another country, that’s good enough for you?
This is it in a nutshell.We have been here before after all with Iraq and weapons of mass destruction, Sadam would tell anyone listening that he had weapons of mass destruction. Spoiler alert. There wasn’t any. The my dad’s bigger than your dad defence strategy of bluffing how well equipped you are has a long history.
The earlier tweet I was referring to:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?