Tenner says we won't get kicked out of the league and it is just a bit of scare?
I really doubt the league would go that far. But it is a punishment available to them. A points deduction isn't out of the question though.
However, it won't come to that. The club will pay. Mark said. Subject to banking procedures of course...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I really doubt the league would go that far. But it is a punishment available to them. A points deduction isn't out of the question though.
However, it won't come to that. The club will pay. Mark said. Subject to banking procedures of course...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I like the bit about ML giving fl updates on progress. I bet thats a short conversation.
Then they will give them an award for there outstanding work in supporter relationshipsThe club will ask for an extension on the deadline for payment on the grounds that the liquidation of Holdings has been problematic. The FL will grant this as they are toothless bastards and this will take the deadline to beyond the JR. Leaving SISU free to ditch the debt if they lose the JR and decide to go the admin route.
I might be wrong but didn't they owe the club money for over charging?
I agree with Lew, if you get a bill, most of the time it is paid just before the due date.
My point being, if they do owe money then there haven't been many stories about it
I hope that the council have paid the club back the rates or have a phenomenally good reason for not doing so. Waiting for the liquidation of ltd or holdings is not a good reason.
Just what is holding up the liquidation? What's so complicated?
There are two modalities of timing, one was the end of May. The other was at the end of the liquidation process. The long and the short of it is, if we make an agreement with the Football League, we will honour it.”
I think it is a mechanism exploiting a loophole in the agreement with the FL. in order to avoid paying. that is what I infer, but unless I have chapter & verse of that agreement I can't prove my suspicion, so I'm just putting that out there, does anyone else have a better explanation?
Quote from Mark Labovich... http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-official-insists-club-7087138
It really does make a mockery of the whole process that ACL get what they would have got by accepting the CVA even when they didn't. Also, the League were able to force the club to make this payment as a condition of membership, so why couldn't playing in Coventry also have been a part of it?
Spineless.
Is it not the same amount for cva and non cva? They couldn't force the club to play in coventry as then acl could have rinsed them for anything they wanted.
Nice bit of a dig there too
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?