you need to give us more than thisFirst name begins with T & Ade will know him
Ā
First name begins with T & Ade will know him
First name that came to mind was Tino Anjorin, but he's supposedly injured until March
Ā
Former or current Chelsea player?First name begins with T & Ade will know him
Only ones I can think of with T are Tammy (Wildly unlikely) and Trevoh (Wanted by Fulham)
Ā
You were shooting down suggestions of Sessegnon earlier today due to his wage, but want us to believe we are interested in a Chalobah whoās on 50k a week
Ā
I know he had no idea
Cant say too much but my source says its a running joke within the club that Nixon makes things up, they have a laugh about it
He got Sheaf right because it was a deal agreed months before announcing, similar to Dasilva and Lats
Ā
Yes but this is a loan to get fit and game time. Sessignon is already wanted by some prem clubs. Letās hope Chelsea want to release quite a few to free up funds for Vik
Ā
I suggested a loan for sessegnon and you shot it down as saying use half his wages on OāHare. Chalobah has Fulham after him? Howās his situation any different to Sessegnons.Yes but this is a loan to get fit and game time. Sessignon is already wanted by some prem clubs. Letās hope Chelsea want to release quite a few to free up funds for Vik
Ā
Chalobah has just returned to training from a long-term injury, so other clubs are unlikely to want to buy the centre-back until he has properly returned to fitness and played games, making a loan more likely if he goes.
Ā
Its great when a name drops, its what this forum should be all about. I wouldn't shocked if we enquired about him but would be surprised if we got close to this.
Keep the names coming. Nobody loses anything by it, if it doesn't come off or even if no truth in it, who cares. We will never know anyway unless he turns up at Ryton anyway.
Keep the names coming. Nobody loses anything by it, if it doesn't come off or even if no truth in it, who cares. We will never know anyway unless he turns up at Ryton anyway.
Ā
Ā
to be honest I cannot see this happening but would be a very ambitious oneIāll scout Nandoās to see if he has made an appearance
Ā
Iāll scout Nandoās to see if he has made an appearance
If you go to Nandos dressed as a scout asking if anyone has seen Trevoh you may get more than you bargained for
Ā
You want the right hand or the left?
Ā
If you go to Nandos dressed as a scout asking if anyone has seen Trevoh you may get more than you bargained for
Ā
It sounds unlikely but you do get some very good loans in the Championship sometimes and I think its time to accept we're one of the bigger fish now so a top quality, slightly unexpected loan isn't entirely out of the question.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Ā
I can confirm that Coventry City are bidding āsubstantial sumsā on an unnamed player but they face fierce competition for them.
Also, please donate to my Patreon here:
Ā
You love a paragraph donāt you darlingIāll quote these all together rather than responding to the same point individually. Firstly, just to say I was airing ideas, so donāt have a go if you disagree, nothing personal (always seem to end up in arguments on here and just cba with that
However I really donāt agree that we donāt need a winger, yes Haji is not a proper winger but just because we donāt have one doesnāt mean we should never have the option to play that way. I always think itās good to keep options open rather than shut the door on things that could improve us. Look at our form before we went to 4 at the back, everyone was saying we donāt need to play 3 up top as we play with wingbacks, weāre now much better off for having ditched that system.
Lastly, Haji is doing a decent job, and Iāve always supported him when others were berating him but I canāt help but feel we could do with some competition or just general backup in that area, or maybe play Haji centrally if Simms isnāt scoring? Palmerās a decent option but Iām not sure heās quite as good as Haji on the āwingā? People say we donāt play with out-and-out wingers but we play with attackers who come from a wing-based position whilst attacking, itās like a minor point whether theyāre classed as āwingersā or not. I just think we could do with some more speedy player who can dribble well rather than passing it around the back a lot, itād just be an interesting/dynamic outlet to have. I just donāt think we should dismiss something just because we havenāt tried it before.
Parklife.
Iāve read none of that
Ā
Iāll quote these all together rather than responding to the same point individually. Firstly, just to say I was airing ideas, so donāt have a go if you disagree, nothing personal (always seem to end up in arguments on here and just cba with that
).However I really donāt agree that we donāt need a winger, yes Haji is not a proper winger but just because we donāt have one doesnāt mean we should never have the option to play that way. I always think itās good to keep options open rather than shut the door on things that could improve us. Look at our form before we went to 4 at the back, everyone was saying we donāt need to play 3 up top as we play with wingbacks, weāre now much better off for having ditched that system.
Lastly, Haji is doing a decent job, and Iāve always supported him when others were berating him but I canāt help but feel we could do with some competition or just general backup in that area, or maybe play Haji centrally if Simms isnāt scoring? Palmerās a decent option but Iām not sure heās quite as good as Haji on the āwingā? People say we donāt play with out-and-out wingers but we play with attackers who come from a wing-based position whilst attacking, itās like a minor point whether theyāre classed as āwingersā or not. I just think we could do with some more speedy players who can dribble well rather than passing it around the back a lot, itād just be an interesting/dynamic outlet to have. I just donāt think we should dismiss something just because we havenāt tried it before.
Parklife.
Ā
Itās even bigger now, I fucked up the multi-quotes
Basically just replying to like 4-5 people that were quoting my earlier message.Ā
TLDRIāll quote these all together rather than responding to the same point individually. Firstly, just to say I was airing ideas, so donāt have a go if you disagree, nothing personal (always seem to end up in arguments on here and just cba with that
However I really donāt agree that we donāt need a winger, yes Haji is not a proper winger but just because we donāt have one doesnāt mean we should never have the option to play that way. I always think itās good to keep options open rather than shut the door on things that could improve us. Look at our form before we went to 4 at the back, everyone was saying we donāt need to play 3 up top as we play with wingbacks, weāre now much better off for having ditched that system.
Lastly, Haji is doing a decent job, and Iāve always supported him when others were berating him but I canāt help but feel we could do with some competition or just general backup in that area, or maybe play Haji centrally if Simms isnāt scoring? Palmerās a decent option but Iām not sure heās quite as good as Haji on the āwingā? People say we donāt play with out-and-out wingers but we play with attackers who come from a wing-based position whilst attacking, itās like a minor point whether theyāre classed as āwingersā or not. I just think we could do with some more speedy player who can dribble well rather than passing it around the back a lot, itād just be an interesting/dynamic outlet to have. I just donāt think we should dismiss something just because we havenāt tried it before.
Parklife.
Ā