Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Transfer Shouts (4 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Tea & Busquets
  • Start date Apr 22, 2022
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • …
  • 252
Next
First Prev 156 of 252 Next Last

Alkhen

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,426
Matt smith said:
We are not, we are just asking for some form of investment in keeping our best players or at least replacing them with a transfer fee

How are you going to continuously sell if you don’t bring anyone in to be the next Gus

The club will therefore just end up losing money as they’re not getting any in - an important point to add which has been mentioned
Click to expand...

Yeah but you are literally fretting about a hypothetical. You and everyone else on here including the "ITKs" on here have no idea how the club will act if and when a big fee is received. it is all speculation and prejudice against our (once) shitty owners. Three things make me think we'd be fine. 1. Robins and the team are always playing down finances, its part of the game they play they never show their hand. 2. In the past 3-4 seasons the club has always reinvested after a sale. And so far it has paid off 3. Despite what many claim the club to back Robins, big fees have been paid for Chaplin, Walker, Godden & Hamer in recent year. they sanctioned Bidwell last year at his request and were clearly set to fund wages for JCS this year
 
Reactions: Hobo, skybluegod and Billfred

Matt smith

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,427
Samo said:
Agreed, all true.
But we are approaching a watershed; will the majority of any big sale be reinvested in the squad or not?
That will tell us all we need to know about our future with these owners.
Click to expand...
Do you think it will be?

Because I don’t think so
 

Alkhen

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,428
Matt smith said:
Do you think it will be?

Because I don’t think so
Click to expand...
but why do you think that?! every time we have made a sale of a major player in the past 3/4 seasons they have replaced that player. It's how their system works
 

Matt smith

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,429
Alkhen said:
but why do you think that?! every time we have made a sale of a major player in the past 3/4 seasons they have replaced that player. It's how their system works
Click to expand...
From what I’ve heard from reliable sources on here
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,430
Matt smith said:
Do you think it will be?

Because I don’t think so
Click to expand...

I suspect not.
At which point the 'model' is in the bin and we know that the club is viewed as nothing more than a high interest borrower by the owners.
 
Reactions: Matt smith

Matt smith

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,431
Samo said:
I suspect not.
At which point the 'model' is in the bin and we know that the club is viewed as nothing more than a high interest borrower by the owners.
Click to expand...
Hallelujah
 
S

Speedie's Head

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,432
Who remembers Dennis Mortimer going to Villa? Far and away our best player of the time.
 
Reactions: Hobo, Danceswithhorses, wingy and 2 others

DazzleTommyDazzle

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,433
Speedie's Head said:
Who remembers Dennis Mortimer going to Villa? Far and away our best player of the time.
Click to expand...

Ruined my Christmas!
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849, oakey, Matt smith and 1 other person

Hutch11

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,434
Speedie's Head said:
Who remembers Dennis Mortimer going to Villa? Far and away our best player of the time.
Click to expand...
Then he led the c***s to their greatest ever triumph
 
S

Speedie's Head

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,435
Hutch11 said:
Then he led the c***s to their greatest ever triumph
Click to expand...

I was always surprised that he never played for England
 
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,436
Matt smith said:
From what I’ve heard from reliable sources on here
Click to expand...
Remember when we didn’t replace McNulty…. Or his replacement Chaplin… the reliable source has actually said we’re likely to be active in January. Or you choosing to ignore that?

I’m guessing the goal is the do what we did last season, have a good first half, nurse through to the World Cup the break comes and we can take stock then.

is it ideal? No - but I fully back this squad to get us to then. the ITK has also said we’ve priced out Gyokeres, so our goalscorer is still likely to be here, it’s looking like we’re pricing O’Hare out of a move.

is it likely Hamer is going? Yes - will be a massive loss - but I back robins to find an adequate replacement albeit on Loan until at least January.

the current squad is better than Birminghams, Readings, Rotherham, as a bare minimum. Id likely throw in Preston, Blackpool and Wigan. Hull are a bit of an unknown atm - and nobody knows what Blackburn will do with their new manager.
 
Reactions: Jamesimus

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,437
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
Remember when we didn’t replace McNulty…. Or his replacement Chaplin… the reliable source has actually said we’re likely to be active in January. Or you choosing to ignore that?

I’m guessing the goal is the do what we did last season, have a good first half, nurse through to the World Cup the break comes and we can take stock then.

is it ideal? No - but I fully back this squad to get us to then. the ITK has also said we’ve priced out Gyokeres, so our goalscorer is still likely to be here, it’s looking like we’re pricing O’Hare out of a move.

is it likely Hamer is going? Yes - will be a massive loss - but I back robins to find an adequate replacement albeit on Loan until at least January.

the current squad is better than Birminghams, Readings, Rotherham, as a bare minimum. Id likely throw in Preston, Blackpool and Wigan. Hull are a bit of an unknown atm - and nobody knows what Blackburn will do with their new manager.
Click to expand...




This is exactly the mindset people had before the 2011-12 season



That went well
 
Reactions: PUSB-We_are_going_up and mr_monkey

Skyblue_CP

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,438
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
Remember when we didn’t replace McNulty…. Or his replacement Chaplin… the reliable source has actually said we’re likely to be active in January. Or you choosing to ignore that?

I’m guessing the goal is the do what we did last season, have a good first half, nurse through to the World Cup the break comes and we can take stock then.

is it ideal? No - but I fully back this squad to get us to then. the ITK has also said we’ve priced out Gyokeres, so our goalscorer is still likely to be here, it’s looking like we’re pricing O’Hare out of a move.

is it likely Hamer is going? Yes - will be a massive loss - but I back robins to find an adequate replacement albeit on Loan until at least January.

the current squad is better than Birminghams, Readings, Rotherham, as a bare minimum. Id likely throw in Preston, Blackpool and Wigan. Hull are a bit of an unknown atm - and nobody knows what Blackburn will do with their new manager.
Click to expand...
Glad to be back in a position where we are speculating if we are better or worse than the teams likely to get relegated. It’s great.
 
Reactions: oakey and Matt smith

Alkhen

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,439
Matt smith said:
From what I’ve heard from reliable sources on here
Click to expand...

Im glad for the Info from the ITK you mention but really how close to the inner circle is he? its one thing having some names of players arriving or leaving but its another knowing the full on financial plan.

Also a few have suggested that particular ITK is the chap who helped the club out with the money for the gym/changing rooms a few years back... if that is the case i'm sure Robins and the team are always telling him we are broke in the hope for another pay out
 

Tea & Busquets

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,440
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
Remember when we didn’t replace McNulty…. Or his replacement Chaplin… the reliable source has actually said we’re likely to be active in January. Or you choosing to ignore that?

I’m guessing the goal is the do what we did last season, have a good first half, nurse through to the World Cup the break comes and we can take stock then.

is it ideal? No - but I fully back this squad to get us to then. the ITK has also said we’ve priced out Gyokeres, so our goalscorer is still likely to be here, it’s looking like we’re pricing O’Hare out of a move.

is it likely Hamer is going? Yes - will be a massive loss - but I back robins to find an adequate replacement albeit on Loan until at least January.

the current squad is better than Birminghams, Readings, Rotherham, as a bare minimum. Id likely throw in Preston, Blackpool and Wigan. Hull are a bit of an unknown atm - and nobody knows what Blackburn will do with their new manager.
Click to expand...

we beat Fulham both times. could give less of a fuck about perceived squad strength.
 
Reactions: Alkhen
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,441
Saddlebrains said:
This is exactly the mindset people had before the 2011-12 season



That went well
Click to expand...
It’s not really though is it? We’d previously lost King, Gunarsson and Westwood - and replaced them with Joe Murphy and Chris Dunn.

we lost our goals and most creative player along with one of the best goalkeepers in the league.

we plugged them with youth and had the worst manager known to man. We were rightly favourites for relegation.

once we sold Turner we brought in McDonald.

the difference is we’re only likely to lose 1 player, and the current squad is full of players who have played multiple times in the championship

ill Be alarmed if we sell Hamer, Gyokeres and O’Hare are sold with no replacement but at this point in time thats not the case
 
Reactions: Alkhen and mr_monkey
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,442
Skyblue_CP said:
Glad to be back in a position where we are speculating if we are better or worse than the teams likely to get relegated. It’s great.
Click to expand...
Well it’s the bare minimum - I’m confident we’ll be around Midtable. Because that’s where we’re at.

don’t get me wrong, I’d love SISU to get their wallets out, but it seems doom and gloom is the default setting.
 
Reactions: mr_monkey and Alkhen

Alkhen

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,443
Saddlebrains said:
This is exactly the mindset people had before the 2011-12 season

That went well
Click to expand...

Now that is a stretch Not even close to being a comparable situation
 
Reactions: CovBrummie94
K

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,444
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
Remember when we didn’t replace McNulty…. Or his replacement Chaplin… the reliable source has actually said we’re likely to be active in January. Or you choosing to ignore that?

I’m guessing the goal is the do what we did last season, have a good first half, nurse through to the World Cup the break comes and we can take stock then.

is it ideal? No - but I fully back this squad to get us to then. the ITK has also said we’ve priced out Gyokeres, so our goalscorer is still likely to be here, it’s looking like we’re pricing O’Hare out of a move.

is it likely Hamer is going? Yes - will be a massive loss - but I back robins to find an adequate replacement albeit on Loan until at least January.

the current squad is better than Birminghams, Readings, Rotherham, as a bare minimum. Id likely throw in Preston, Blackpool and Wigan. Hull are a bit of an unknown atm - and nobody knows what Blackburn will do with their new manager.
Click to expand...

I think it's difficult to compare the now to then really. Fees received for Chaplin, Bayliss and McNulty would've probably gone further than whatever we're likely to receive now due to the club's significantly lower wage bill and much lower club operating costs.

With our wage bill likely being around 100% of turnover, and factoring in the EFL loan and interest payments as well as instalments due on Gyokeres and Sheaf it's clear that the club's ability to reinvest a fee this summer back into the playing budget is going to be incredibly limited - far more so than it probably would've been in the past.
 

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,445
Matt smith said:
We are not, we are just asking for some form of investment in keeping our best players or at least replacing them with a transfer fee

How are you going to continuously sell if you don’t bring anyone in to be the next Gus

The club will therefore just end up losing money as they’re not getting any in - an important point to add which has been mentioned
Click to expand...

Has anybody said we shouldn't replace somebody if they go? Think the difference is the realism to know it's not going to be half of the fees received...
 

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,446
Saddlebrains said:
This is exactly the mindset people had before the 2011-12 season



That went well
Click to expand...

The two teams aren't even comparable, nor the managers, nor the negativity around the club. Talk about overdramatic.
 
Reactions: djr8369 and HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,447
So people are saying they're happy if we flogged Hamer and dont get a replacement?
 
N

Northeast sky blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,448
skybluegod said:
Has anybody said we shouldn't replace somebody if they go? Think the difference is the realism to know it's not going to be half of the fees received...
Click to expand...
So if we were to sell say for argu
skybluegod said:
Has anybody said we shouldn't replace somebody if they go? Think the difference is the realism to know it's not going to be half of the fees received...
Click to expand...
So if we were to sell, let's say Hamer and O'Hare for a combined 15 million, then it's unrealistic to expect Robins to be given half
 
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,449
Saddlebrains said:
So people are saying they're happy if we flogged Hamer and dont get a replacement?
Click to expand...
Nobody is saying they’ll be happy with that. Doubt we’ll get a like for like replacement, but we’re likely to replace with someone who is adequate.

it won’t be a case of - “well we’ve got Jamie Allen, so off we go”
 

mr_monkey

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,450
 
Reactions: SkyBlueSam01, Matt smith, mark82 and 1 other person

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,451
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
Nobody is saying they’ll be happy with that. Doubt we’ll get a like for like replacement, but we’re likely to replace with someone who is adequate.

it won’t be a case of - “well we’ve got Jamie Allen, so off we go”
Click to expand...


Why is adequate acceptable though?

We would have made a 9 million quid profit on him if the rumoured figure is to be believed.

Absolutely no reason why say 3 of that shouldnt be made available to MR no?
 
Reactions: Northeast sky blue

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,452
Samo said:
Agreed, all true.
But we are approaching a watershed; will the majority of any big sale be reinvested in the squad or not?
That will tell us all we need to know about our future with these owners.
Click to expand...
What big sale? No fucker has left, its literally BS speculation from no marks and tossers spouting bollocks.

This could actually be one of the very few years I can recall when the manager hasn't been told to sell his best asset.

If we can actually hang on to our proven performers fir once, at the expense of not gambling away money on risky big money signings, then I'd say that's excellent backing from the owners.

Doesn't it sat something when our better players are signing new contracts instead of demanding moves?
 
Reactions: slowpoke, robbiethemole, djr8369 and 2 others

Samo

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,453
fatso said:
What big sale? No fucker has left, its literally BS speculation from no marks and tossers spouting bollocks.

This could actually be one of the very few years I can recall when the manager hasn't been told to sell his best asset.

If we can actually hang on to our proven performers fir once, at the expense of not gambling away money on risky big money signings, then I'd say that's excellent backing from the owners.

Doesn't it sat something when our better players are signing new contracts instead of demanding moves?
Click to expand...

This thread is entirely based on speculation fatso, so when I mentioned a big sale, I'm talking about a potential big sale. Understand now?
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,454
Samo said:
This thread is entirely based on speculation fatso, so when I mentioned a big sale, I'm talking about a potential big sale. Understand now?
Click to expand...
And I'm potentially the next king of England.
When does the speculation end and the reality kick in?
 
Reactions: robbiekeane
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,455
Saddlebrains said:
Why is adequate acceptable though?

We would have made a 9 million quid profit on him if the rumoured figure is to be believed.

Absolutely no reason why say 3 of that shouldnt be made available to MR no?
Click to expand...
And I don’t disagree with you. Fact is our owners aren’t stumping up, and they’re using the EFL loan, and the fact our wages are high as the excuse.

if you listen to what Skybluebeliever is saying, we’ll have the wages available. The club will be more active post World Cup,

with the wages available, if it’s believed Hamers New contract is somewhere between 12-15k per week, I have faith that Robins can bring in someone be it on loan or on a free that’s better than Allen/Kelly/Howley, but I accept they won’t be as good as Hamer.

I won’t be happy, but like last season the meltdown is just OTT.
 
Reactions: Saddlebrains

Samo

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,456
fatso said:
And I'm potentially the next king of England.
When does the speculation end and the reality kick in?
Click to expand...

This thread, and lets be honest this whole forum, is about speculation.
If you want reality, why are you even on here reading this stuff you idiot?
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,457
Samo said:
This thread, and lets be honest this whole forum, is about speculation.
If you want reality, why are you even on here reading this stuff you idiot?
Click to expand...
When speculation is being used to continuously hammer the owners, by people who wouldn't even know what day it is, you have to say its gone too far.
 
Reactions: skybluegod, mr_monkey and mmttww

ceetee

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,458
Speculating is fine.

Getting all upset because today's speculation is that yesterday's speculation isn't going to happen and behaving as if it's fact is ridiculous
 
Reactions: robbiekeane, Nick and fatso

Samo

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,459
Lets ban speculation as a concept.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 12, 2022
  • #5,460
fernandopartridge said:
Let's be honest if one goes the quality of the squad takes a step backwards. The owners should repay the wholly unnecessary interest they extracted in 2019 which would pay the rest of one of the big 3's contract.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
This is key. By all means run sustainably, and that means players have to be sold and not all the fee reinvested in the squad itself but... don't add extra handicaps so we're doing that game with one arm tied behind our backs.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer, TomRad85 and Samo
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • …
  • 252
Next
First Prev 156 of 252 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?