They eBayed a couple of the handbags joy had left around the placeOK so it was flagged up that King didn't pay for the improvements, but nobody seems to want to tell me who did.
Who paid for the training ground improvements? Somebody must have a definitive answer eh.
Eh?
Eh eh?
OK so it was flagged up that King didn't pay for the improvements, but nobody seems to want to tell me who did.
Who paid for the training ground improvements? Somebody must have a definitive answer eh.
Eh?
Eh eh?
On one of the interminable threads we've got. If it was posted as King didn't, then the obvious assumption is that somebody must know who did eh, else they wouldn't be able to know that King didn't.Flagged where?
On one of the interminable threads we've got. If it was posted as King didn't, then the obvious assumption is that somebody must know who did eh, else they wouldn't be able to know that King didn't.
And the obvious assumption is that one of our many ITKs must know.
They know, you know. They've got experience.
On one of the interminable threads we've got. If it was posted as King didn't, then the obvious assumption is that somebody must know who did eh, else they wouldn't be able to know that King didn't.
And the obvious assumption is that one of our many ITKs must know.
They know, you know. They've got experience.
I mean there is a serious point, that if he didn't it would indeed be useful to know who did, as it would be useful to know just how improvements are being financed or otherwise. It's the same as the ground - just what the deal actually is would be useful to know if we should be optimistic or wrist slashing.Ok, I'll ignore it then.
I mean there is a serious point, that if he didn't it would indeed be useful to know who did, as it would be useful to know just how improvements are being financed or otherwise. It's the same as the ground - just what the deal actually is would be useful to know if we should be optimistic or wrist slashing.
But the claim is out there, so now it's time to put meat on the bones.
I think it was from that tweet where the guy was listing loads of problemsI agree. It's just the source of the comment being this mad house that makes me dubious.
Not denying that! So let's move beyond the shadowy someone / something else.I agree. It's just the source of the comment being this mad house that makes me dubious.
I mean there is a serious point, that if he didn't it would indeed be useful to know who did, as it would be useful to know just how improvements are being financed or otherwise. It's the same as the ground - just what the deal actually is would be useful to know if we should be optimistic or wrist slashing.
But the claim is out there, so now it's time to put meat on the bones.
The specifics about King financing operating losses was indeed... interesting phrasing.The hedge fund I assume
I mean there is a serious point, that if he didn't it would indeed be useful to know who did, as it would be useful to know just how improvements are being financed or otherwise. It's the same as the ground - just what the deal actually is would be useful to know if we should be optimistic or wrist slashing.
But the claim is out there, so now it's time to put meat on the bones.
I don't support either of those clubs, so it'd be a bit daft if me to do so.You should go on Newcastle United's or Man City's forum and ask who and where is their finances actually coming from and who is actually paying for what?
he’s got problems that’s for sure
I think you are missing my point?I don't support either of those clubs, so it'd be a bit daft if me to do so.
I suppose I could learn Dutch and ask Heerenveen
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?