TIM FISHER's BPA Lies (1 Viewer)

SkyBlueRuffian · Dec 17, 2016

Tim Fisher claims that because of the on pitch protests on Thursday evening this has put off Mr Sharp and the BPA team for considering any deal with CCFC. This is absolute lies and not FACT as he put it last night. CCFC are nowhere near the BPA lease deal that was finalised this week because of 1 thing and 1 thing only, SISU. There are other companies/clubs involved in the BPA deal and I'm afraid none of them are CCFC.

They don't want any deal with our club while they're at the helm, so don't believe his bull-shit, just more lies from the arrogant twat that is Tim Fisher.

wingy · Dec 17, 2016

Another convenient excuse??

Grendel · Dec 17, 2016

The last chairman who tried to blame fans for ruining investment after an on field protest against Sheffield United when on Sky lasted about another 8 years in the job.

Suffolk sky blues · Dec 17, 2016

Iv calmed down said sorry to my wife filled the hole in the wall i punched & slept on it.100% TIM FISHER is the problem nothing adds up with him.

SkyBlueRuffian · Dec 17, 2016

He's a liar, plain and simple. No one will work with him or SISU and can you blame them.

clint van damme · Dec 17, 2016

Suffolk sky blues said:
Iv calmed down said sorry to my wife filled the hole in the wall i punched & slept on it.100% TIM FISHER is the problem nothing adds up with him.

do you think if he went the next man or woman would improve things?

I think he just does as he's told, although he doesn't need to come across so smugly.

Brylowes · Dec 17, 2016

SkyBlueRuffian said:
Tim Fisher claims that because of the on pitch protests on Thursday evening this has put off Mr Sharp and the BPA team for considering any deal with CCFC. This is absolute lies and not FACT as he put it last night. CCFC are nowhere near the BPA lease deal that was finalised this week because of 1 thing and 1 thing only, SISU. There are other companies/clubs involved in the BPA deal and I'm afraid none of them are CCFC.

They don't want any deal with our club while they're at the helm, so don't believe his bull-shit, just more lies from the arrogant twat that is Tim Fisher.

Have to say this pleases me, if we move to the BPA I think it would remove any (outside) chance
Of us ever returning to the big time, can't see anymore than 12.000 being allowed there.

Grendel said:
The last chairman who tried to blame fans for ruining investment after an on field protest against Sheffield United when on Sky lasted about another 8 years in the job.

i really don't think we have 8 years, we will be finished in 2. IMHO

Captain Dart · Dec 17, 2016

Suffolk sky blues said:
Iv calmed down said sorry to my wife filled the hole in the wall i punched & slept on it.100% TIM FISHER is the problem nothing adds up with him.

SISU and Joy Seppala is the problem, Fisher is just her agent. Nothing will change till SISU are history.

CCFC54321 · Dec 17, 2016

SkyBlueRuffian said:
Tim Fisher claims that because of the on pitch protests on Thursday evening this has put off Mr Sharp and the BPA team for considering any deal with CCFC. This is absolute lies and not FACT as he put it last night. CCFC are nowhere near the BPA lease deal that was finalised this week because of 1 thing and 1 thing only, SISU. There are other companies/clubs involved in the BPA deal and I'm afraid none of them are CCFC.

They don't want any deal with our club while they're at the helm, so don't believe his bull-shit, just more lies from the arrogant twat that is Tim Fisher.

You beat me to this post. If this can be proven 100% that the statement made is a lie then TF has to go now. That is not acceptable and a person in such a position cannot make inaccurate statements and must be made accountable.

If anyone from the local press or radio reading this trail could do some digging and publish this then TF must leave the post with immediate effect.

Bob Latchford · Dec 17, 2016

Wasn't another take over by Arabs blamed on a pitch invasion before, at Highfield Road ? these ''potential'' owners don't like pitch invasions do they.

shmmeee · Dec 17, 2016

CCFC54321 said:
That is not acceptable and a person in such a position cannot make inaccurate statements and must be made accountable.

hill83 · Dec 17, 2016

Grendel said:
The last chairman who tried to blame fans for ruining investment after an on field protest against Sheffield United when on Sky lasted about another 8 years in the job.

What's your point?

Nick · Dec 17, 2016

clint van damme said:
do you think if he went the next man or woman would improve things?

I think he just does as he's told, although he doesn't need to come across so smugly.

I still think the same thing could be done but handled in a different way to give a much better outcome.

Malaka · Dec 17, 2016

Bob Latchford said:
Wasn't another take over by Arabs blamed on a pitch invasion before, at Highfield Road ? these ''potential'' owners don't like pitch invasions do they.

I heard it was the Sultan of Brunei (seriously)

oldskyblue58 · Dec 17, 2016

Misdirection has always been a major tactic in this saga. The thing is buried in everything he says is a small element of truth that he could point to. It isn't what he says any more it is more why he said it that is important.

Sisu won't remove him because he is doing exactly what they need him to do

oldskyblue58 · Dec 17, 2016

Malaka said:
I heard it was the Sultan of Brunei (seriously)

I seem to remember that too

Bob Latchford · Dec 17, 2016

Malaka said:
I heard it was the Sultan of Brunei (seriously)

I heard it was a Prince . are they one of the same or does a Sultan outrank a Prince ?

skybluetony176 · Dec 17, 2016

It's more likely that the pitch invasion reiterated what a god almighty mess they've made of CCFC and JS has finally come to the realisation he'd have to be completely mental to get CRFC into bed with SISU. So from a certain point of view he wasn't lying, he just made sure it came across a certain way that pushes the blame away from SISU. Which is a common theme. Nothing is their fault.

Bob Latchford · Dec 17, 2016

SkyBlueRuffian said:
He's a liar, plain and simple. No one will work with him or SISU and can you blame them.

His credibility took a kicking last night . hell, even Eakin said Tim , people just don't believe you .
As for the ball boy/girls - he didn't seem to care about them being '' The Future '' when he left them behind when we were forced to go to Sixfields !

skybluebeduff · Dec 17, 2016

oldskyblue58 said:
Misdirection has always been a major tactic in this saga. The thing is buried in everything he says is a small element of truth that he could point to. It isn't what he says any more it is more why he said it that is important.

Sisu won't remove him because he is doing exactly what they need him to do

I'm glad you've mentioned the word 'Misdirection'. Tim might be a wanker, but i tell you what, he's clever. Listen to his answers, nearly all of them began with "well let's look at it the opposite way"..

stupot07 · Dec 17, 2016

I must have misheard him, because I thought he was said continued pitch invading and protesting would put CRFC off rather than it had put them off?

Anyway, we know they like to misdirect, just like other parties involved in our sorry state.

Its difficult to believe anything that is being said.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

chiefdave · Dec 17, 2016

CWR should get Sharp on air and ask him the question.

Otis · Dec 17, 2016

stupot07 said:
I must have misheard him, because I thought he was said continued pitch invading and protesting would put CRFC off rather than it had put them off?

Anyway, we know they like to misdirect, just like other parties involved in our sorry state.

Its difficult to believe anything that is being said.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

I thought he said they WERE put off.

Anyone got the recording to check?

Grendel · Dec 17, 2016

Otis said:
I thought he said they WERE put off.

Anyone got the recording to check?

He said something about a non match arrangement being agreed and this sort of thing doesn't help.

Otis · Dec 17, 2016

Grendel said:
He said something about a non match arrangement being agreed and this sort of thing doesn't help.

Yes, I recall that bit, but I think he alluded to it on three occasions.

Will try and dig out the interview.

hutch1972 · Dec 17, 2016

Bob Latchford said:
Wasn't another take over by Arabs blamed on a pitch invasion before, at Highfield Road ? these ''potential'' owners don't like pitch invasions do they.

That was the one mentioned earlier. Claim was from BR

rupert_bear · Dec 17, 2016

The answer is simple ask that Jon Sharpe direct.

SkyBlueRuffian · Dec 17, 2016

Told you so...........

http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-butts-park-arena-12335738

chiefdave · Dec 17, 2016

SkyBlueRuffian said:
Told you so...........

http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-butts-park-arena-12335738

But with Mr Millerchip selling the head lease to the rugby club, he no longer has a say and a ground share with Coventry City could now be pursued.

torchomatic · Dec 17, 2016

What Sharpe says is more important than what Millerchip says.

ecky · Dec 17, 2016

skybluebeduff said:
I'm glad you've mentioned the word 'Misdirection'. Tim might be a wanker, but i tell you what, he's clever. Listen to his answers, nearly all of them began with "well let's look at it the opposite way"..

Yeh he's trained like a politician how to answer questions
Thing is politicians are scum and only look after themselves so there are many similarities

blueflint · Dec 17, 2016

i really can't believe anyone could believe a word he says

SkyblueBazza · Dec 17, 2016

Missed the interviews myself but a quote attributed to TF that I got from BBC Sport..."There is a requirement to have our own stadium - if we stay at the Ricoh this club will die," said Fisher.

"We do not access the revenues that are necessary for this football club," he told BBC Coventry and Warwickshire.

"We have bid on a lot of sites but we have not been able to close a deal."

For me that last statement encapsulates everything since they took over - which is pretty appalling for our "...owners are an investment management company..." (his words apparently) yet time & time again the only deals they can agree tend to have taken us backwards. I suspect they haven't had a bid on any of the "lots of sites" is because they pursue unrealistic outcomes

...onwards & upwards PUSB

torchomatic · Dec 17, 2016

blueflint said:
i really can't believe anyone could believe a word he says

Only when it suits the argument of course, eh Tony?

skybluetony176 · Dec 17, 2016

SkyblueBazza said:
Missed the interviews myself but a quote attributed to TF that I got from BBC Sport..."There is a requirement to have our own stadium - if we stay at the Ricoh this club will die," said Fisher.

"We do not access the revenues that are necessary for this football club," he told BBC Coventry and Warwickshire.

"We have bid on a lot of sites but we have not been able to close a deal."

For me that last statement encapsulates everything since they took over - which is pretty appalling for our "...owners are an investment management company..." (his words apparently) yet time & time again the only deals they can agree tend to have taken us backwards. I suspect they haven't had a bid on any of the "lots of sites" is because they pursue unrealistic outcomes

...onwards & upwards PUSB

Also if the bids were unsuccessful there can't be any commercial confidentiality anymore. Nothing stopping him listing these sites now. I bet he won't though.

TIM FISHER's BPA Lies (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

CCFC Finance Director

CCFC Finance Director

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency