No reason, he talks rot.
I only proposed it as a possibility. Why don't you tell me what you speculate the announcement Tim said would 'upset' the fans could be?So why would they go to admin and why all the scaremongering all of a sudden? Why would they go down the admin route?
It's the parent company I would worry about Nick if the Clive Eakin thing is true. Would the FL treat us as if we were in administration if the parent company is in poo city?Why would the club go into admin?
It's the parent company I would worry about Nick if the Clive Eakin thing is true. Would the FL treat us as if we were in administration if the parent company is in poo city?
So why would they go to admin and why all the scaremongering all of a sudden? Why would they go down the admin route?
Don't a hell of a lot of clubs make losses, are they going into admin too?
Where has this come from all of a sudden?
The text that was read out near the end of the CWR program on Friday.What Clive Eakin thing?
Here's a theory. That word again. Theory.
What if by putting the club through admin again the club loses Ryton but AVRO retain it because of the debenture they have on it, meaning that as Ryton is no longer connected to CCFC, meaning that SISU/ARVO are now free to sell Ryton for development WITHOUT having to supply a replacement?
Here's a theory. That word again. Theory.
What if by putting the club through admin again the club loses Ryton but AVRO retain it because of the debenture they have on it, meaning that as Ryton is no longer connected to CCFC, meaning that SISU/ARVO are now free to sell Ryton for development WITHOUT having to supply a replacement?
Here's a theory. That word again. Theory.
What if by putting the club through admin again the club loses Ryton but AVRO retain it because of the debenture they have on it, meaning that as Ryton is no longer connected to CCFC, meaning that SISU/ARVO are now free to sell Ryton for development WITHOUT having to supply a replacement?
Where though. Does it have to be in Rugby District?Wouldn't a replacement need to be done whoever owned it anyway though before it got planning?
Where though. Does it have to be in Rugby District?
The need for a replacem,ent is a planning condition, based on what the site's used for atm.
As mentioned before, the only issue is whether a replacement is considered a couple of goalposts in a field, or a half-decent sports training facility. The club is incidental to that however.
It hasn't been said has it?
It still doesn't make a difference to whether they go into admin to try and get round it.
Well it is 50% right so far
I understand Evans has been approached but MV has said "let me give it a go "
Here's a theory. That word again. Theory.
What if by putting the club through admin again the club loses Ryton but AVRO retain it because of the debenture they have on it, meaning that as Ryton is no longer connected to CCFC, meaning that SISU/ARVO are now free to sell Ryton for development WITHOUT having to supply a replacement?
In the past they've only done that if the parent company only owns the football club, ie: it isn't a legitimate company in its own right just a holding company.It's the parent company I would worry about Nick if the Clive Eakin thing is true. Would the FL treat us as if we were in administration if the parent company is in poo city?
Knowing TF's sense of humour, that sounds genuine. But what he meant by what the fans won't like is the business model thing – we have to live within our means & all that.It wasn't just this lad who heard him say it either, a few others can back this up apparently...
I
I don't know
But the budget is £2-1m
If that's 60% turnover is £3-5m
Take out £600 K for the Academy
You're left with £800k for the rest
Is that enough?
Knowing TF's sense of humour, that sounds genuine. But what he meant by what the fans won't like is the business model thing – we have to live within our means & all that.
It wasn't just this lad who heard him say it either, a few others can back this up apparently...
So why would they go to admin and why all the scaremongering all of a sudden? Why would they go down the admin route?
Don't a hell of a lot of clubs make losses, are they going into admin too?
Where has this come from all of a sudden?
Haven't we known that for months about breaking even?Businesses don't go bust because they are making losses
They go bust (or into Administration) because they run out of money
From posts in this and other threads it seems the club is being expected to survive on just the income the it can itself generate.
This possibly means we are living on a hand to mouth basis and savings are desperately needed wherever they can be made
Not that I could possibly condone such action but why didn't somebody twat him ?Despite having major reservations about the sanity of dipping back into the happy, happy fun land of SBT...here we go...
I was one of a few fans – London Supporters Club members – who got the train back to London and yes, TF was there and came and sat with us all the way back. I think that the person who is the source of this 'the fans won't like this' rumour was from some others who he'd spoken to on the platform a bit earlier.
Anyhow, it's nothing too scurrilous or major TBH. Just a reiteration of the business model that we have: costs can't exceed revenues & ours is a bit rubbish because we don't have access to the normal non-ticketing income. (Aside from merch, sponsorship & minor commercial.)
There's more but I'm sure nobody's really interested ;-)
Clearly his just proves TF whilst we may not like him per se he is merely just the fall guy. He seems seperate to sisu and even trying to get them away if to be believed. Fair play if true
Not that I could possibly condone such action but why didn't somebody twat him ?
Like a lot of your posts ?Because it would be a deplorable act?
Like a lot of your posts ?
Yes mate here until Saturday , although it's passing it down today , hence on here in the barNo nothing like my posts actually - where are you now? Dominican Republic still lol.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?