And the fucking computer said No!!..declaring on the first day of a Test Match 8 wickets down, just because you want to have a few overs at the opposition openers.
Exactly what, though? Nobody's even attempted to explain it to the masses.
Google will change quite dramatically within the next year because of AI.
I've had a play around with the Google SGE - in its current form I don't see how they'd avoid being sued in Europe for plagiarism - it's a real shit show. I expect it'll be rolled out before the end of this year though.They’ve already announced a bunch of changes. What’ll stop the big guys I think is fear of bad outputs. Apple reportedly killed Siri GPT because they want total control over what it outputs and can guarantee no incorrect or dangerous information, which is likely not how any of this works.
I've had a play around with the Google SGE - in its current form I don't see how they'd avoid being sued in Europe for plagiarism - it's a real shit show. I expect it'll be rolled out before the end of this year though.
Unlike Bing, it’s AI generated results don’t display the source of the answer that’s just been lifted from a website.Plagiarism?
Unlike Bing, it’s AI generated results don’t display the source of the answer that’s just been lifted from a website.
Not sure I’m comfortable with a company like Google doing that and deciding what the ‘correct’ answer is to someone’s query.
Google has long been trying to move towards it being the source of information and people not leaving it - personally I don’t think that’s a good thing for the internet in the long term.
I’m talking about organic website traffic rather than the ads - the ads are well incorporated, unsurprisingly. I’ve also seen stuff over the last few years that hasn’t been made public and the direction where it’s going to be taking them.I mean the day they do that is the day their business dies so I’d be very surprised. They’ve explicitly said they want to find ways to still run ads and drive traffic.
Google loses money if you just hang about on their site. They aren’t Amazon or Facebook. It’s one of the few sites where time on site is a bad thing.
And it doesn’t lift text. And I think there’s going to have to be a serious reconsideration of copyright law like Japan have done. We had this with generative image aI as well and artists claiming it’s “copying” them. But that’s what humans do. A lot of people are going to have to rethink their business model.
I’m talking about organic website traffic rather than the ads - the ads are well incorporated, unsurprisingly.
I’ve seen it myself where it’s taken text word for word from a website within the AI answer and there’s been no attribution or link through to the source of the website.
As I said, I don’t feel comfortable with the user not having the source of the answer. That’s not even going into the lack of incentives for publishers to create content in the future.
Also use it at least 5 times a day. I write emails with it, review candidate CVs, write strategies, get recipes with what’s in my fridge. Lazy as fuck and dangerous yes, but for the meantime I’m Uber productive and I’m riding that waveSo we built language models to predict the next word, big whoop we’ve been doing that forever, it’s on your phone keyboard right now.
However we discovered that if we just chuck fuck tons of data and processing power at these word prediction algorithms, then train them a bit with human feedback, suddenly they’re not just word prediction algorithms, they’re something akin to intelligence that can reason.
Suddenly the issues we face aren’t algorithmic but a case of waiting for even bigger models and working out if we’ve accidentally created AGI without trying (there’s still some debate about whether that’s what we’re doing but the fact the major voices in machine learning disagree on this suggests it’s not clear cut either way).
At roughly the same time we’ve managed to develop algorithms that can create professional looking audio and video that means we’ve got close to machine understanding of the word through three major senses.
What will this mean? Well firstly all our economic predictions were probably wrong. Suddenly computer programmers can be waaay more productive, and marketers, artists and musicians may be the first not the last to get their jobs automated.
Is it there now? Fuck no. But the progress made in the last year is astonishing. ChatGPT has bigger user adoption than Google and Facebook at a similar time with zero spend or vitality features. Because it’s really useful to a bunch of people. I use it four ir five times a day from document summary to brainstorming to doing analysis on data I can’t be arsed to where I don’t need exact results.
Most “AI” is machine learning. It’s quite simple fitting to an error function for a given training set. Large language models (like ChatGPT) seem to be something else entirely, producing emergent intelligent behaviour.
Also use it at least 5 times a day. I write emails with it, review candidate CVs, write strategies, get recipes with what’s in my fridge. Lazy as fuck and dangerous yes, but for the meantime I’m Uber productive and I’m riding that wave
That's much better with the sources of the information at the bottom.If you like ChatGPT worth a look at perplexity.ai and their copilot feature. It’s basically ChatGPT but it also asks relevant followup questions. You get five queries in a four hour sliding window for copilot.
That's much better with the sources of the information at the bottom.
A very very slow drive past eh Tommo!Driving past the fair up Sandy Lane on way home. Jailbaiters out in force and it draws out the pervs.
It’s similar to what Bing is doing and what Google will eventually do (Google’s testing version of it doesn’t show sources). From an SEO perspective it’ll be the biggest change it’s ever seen.Yeah it does some nice stuff to turn a chatbot into a useful tool TBH. Thing is behind the scenes it’s using google or bing or whatever with keywords so I guess nothing changes from an SEO perspective?
Thanks for taking the time to try and explain. I suppose I don't understand because I've never used ChatGPT or even been vaguely attracted to it! Nobody at work is using it or seems to know what it is-although they could be lying.So we built language models to predict the next word, big whoop we’ve been doing that forever, it’s on your phone keyboard right now.
However we discovered that if we just chuck fuck tons of data and processing power at these word prediction algorithms, then train them a bit with human feedback, suddenly they’re not just word prediction algorithms, they’re something akin to intelligence that can reason.
Suddenly the issues we face aren’t algorithmic but a case of waiting for even bigger models and working out if we’ve accidentally created AGI without trying (there’s still some debate about whether that’s what we’re doing but the fact the major voices in machine learning disagree on this suggests it’s not clear cut either way).
At roughly the same time we’ve managed to develop algorithms that can create professional looking audio and video that means we’ve got close to machine understanding of the word through three major senses.
What will this mean? Well firstly all our economic predictions were probably wrong. Suddenly computer programmers can be waaay more productive, and marketers, artists and musicians may be the first not the last to get their jobs automated.
Is it there now? Fuck no. But the progress made in the last year is astonishing. ChatGPT has bigger user adoption than Google and Facebook at a similar time with zero spend or vitality features. Because it’s really useful to a bunch of people. I use it four ir five times a day from document summary to brainstorming to doing analysis on data I can’t be arsed to where I don’t need exact results.
Most “AI” is machine learning. It’s quite simple fitting to an error function for a given training set. Large language models (like ChatGPT) seem to be something else entirely, producing emergent intelligent behaviour.
I assume AI is behind the changes to Twitter, which i find is now borderline unusable. I thought that tweets from anyone i follow would turn up under the "Following" tab - but oh, no - there is loads of stuff in the "For you" tab which is posted from them mashed up with all the vitriol and ads that i have no interest in. It won't be long before i ditch it for good, unless someone can explain to me how it is supposed to work now??
I think that is the problem. It is all out of order. But why do some tweets from, for example, CCFC or my sister, turn up in "For you" but some in "Following"? I wish they had just left it alone - did they ASK any Twitter users whether this change was wanted? I doubt it!Following should be just people you follow. For You is shit the algorithm thinks you want. What seems to have disappeared is the ordering. Used to be you could have the algorithm sort tweets or just have them in chronological order but that’s disappeared now.
Robbing restaurants and "gastro-pubs" now charging as much for a standard bottle of wine as 2 main course meals.
Sneaky 10% service charge added to the billRobbing restaurants and "gastro-pubs" now charging as much for a standard bottle of wine as 2 main course meals.
Makes you wonder who wrote that stuff!People talking about AI and the fact I don’t understand most of it
Can we please get back onto cyclists and the prices of things!
People who park on corners.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?