It's the usual they're being unfair so we're not gonna cooperate and the same from the other side. Best bit of this statement is the third party getting involved, might be able to bang their heads together so we can get this sorted.
Will it be binding abirtration on both sides? I'd yes then a good thing. ACL Have right on their side I believe. PUSB
Surely there's too much bad blood by now? They should have done this months and months ago; ahead of looking at other venues in Northamptonshire, ahead of faing foul of a court order, ahead of agreeing heads of terms and then changing their minds, and ahead of pulling the rabbit of a £30m stadium just outside of Rugby from the hat?!?
I note they don't refute any of yesterday's claims. But that wording is not at all helpful
They did refute the claims. What planet do you live on. They also claimed the guy who made the statement has never even been at any of the meetings.
Why do you lie all the time?
Where do they refute the claims in that statement? On the official, written statement?
Your day is going from bad to worse...
How do they think this sort of language is received?!?
Wisest thing they have said all day.
However the mediator needs to be chosen by both.
Not introduced by SISU otherwise there will be dis trust again.
The only way this will get concluded.
"Therefore, we again propose to invite a leading expert in football finance - such as Deloittes to act as a mediator and help drive through a deal which makes sense." - CCFC
Can anyone tell me when they first made this proposal?
The courts have backed ACL, it is too late for arbitration. Fisher should have suggested this months ago. To propose arbitration now is very arrogrant, but par for the course. Who is to say they would accept anything that wasn't totally in their favour?
It is a bit like the bloke who's picked on the wrong chap in the pub suddenly suggesting its a big misunderstanding, and it can easily be settled over a pint...
Probably when Joy told them the Heads of Terms they agreed to were unacceptable and to go back with some new ideas. This being akin to sending on a substitution in injury time. Probably a good idea; but why not earlier?!?
How much do you think they would cost?
I think Deloittes decision would have to be legally binding.
Also it would have to be completed in a month.
Otherwise as MMM says could just be more delaying tactics
And who is to say either camp will honour it.
She is hands on now involved in all negotiations
Yet she was not there-why?
Her hands are only on Timmy's neck for agreeing those damn Heads of Terms! Boy I bet he took a bollocking. His floppy hair would have been all over the place; flapping like Hedman with a corner!
Maybe he believed it was about the rent and he needed to get it down to 170 and when he got 150 he went running back to Mummy. I have done the deal.
Your day is going from bad to worse...
Odd thing to say. Being a City fan I'd have thought your day would have been getting worse too. Obviously not.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?