skybluesam66
Well-Known Member
I think he also took a red for the team and was a combination of what had gone before including the potential last man tackle on Gyokores and no doubt he would have found out about the penalty claim at half time
I think he also took a red for the team and was a combination of what had gone before including the potential last man tackle on Gyokores and no doubt he would have found out about the penalty claim at half timeI thought the red was right as the potential and intention to put his foot down the back of Maatsen’s planted foot was there. It’s high and from behind, which anyone that’s played knows can be dangerous when you can’t see it coming.
From memory, Bowyer was a good player in his time at Leeds and a battler but committed some horrible fouls. Remember him stamping on a Valencia player’s head in the Champions League, which is as bad as it gets.
Bowyer also thought they were the better side so...
I only saw the pre-match interviews with the managers but Bowyer sounded like an absolute moron there. The guy struggled to put a sentence together.
The team really reflect the manager there.
I didn't get how that kind of dissent isn't an instant yellow. If you give a yellow out when that happens it won't take long before people stop doing it.Maybe the ref remembered him for blatantly telling him to f**k off earlier?
Can't see it being overturned. If it was the other way round we'd have been moaning on the night but once you saw the replay you can't really object.
Doesn't it have to be an obvious error to win an appeal? Would only really work if they were claiming it wasn't a foul at all. If they're admitting its a foul then not sure they'll get far arguing over if it should be yellow or red.
They will try to use the not the let man rubbish.
I didn't get how that kind of dissent isn't an instant yellow. If you give a yellow out when that happens it won't take long before people stop doing it.
They will try to use the not the let man rubbish.
Its not about the last man, it's about the tackle.
Amazed by the 2 guys on skysports.Morrison and Phillips sayingit should have been a yellow and he was only taking one for the team.....ex pros defending cheating ...fairly typical sadly
If they gave yellows every time someone swore at them Adi would have a lot more than 1 by nowI sent people off if I got sworn at, to be honest. There’s dissent and there’s being plainly abusive.
If they gave yellows every time someone swore at them Adi would have a lot more than 1 by now
That was his intent but he actually made a really bad foul so although I agreed with you initially on second watching the ref got it right.Apparently I'm in the minority, but I thought it was never a red card. He didn't intend to hurt him (or "endanger" him or whatever), he just wanted to trip him, which he did. Nuclear meltdown on here if it had happened to one of our players.
Apparently I'm in the minority, but I thought it was never a red card. He didn't intend to hurt him (or "endanger" him or whatever), he just wanted to trip him, which he did. Nuclear meltdown on here if it had happened to one of our players.
Bowyer also thought they were the better side so...
Apparently I'm in the minority, but I thought it was never a red card. He didn't intend to hurt him (or "endanger" him or whatever), he just wanted to trip him, which he did. Nuclear meltdown on here if it had happened to one of our players.
Glad I’m not the only oneApparently I'm in the minority, but I thought it was never a red card. He didn't intend to hurt him (or "endanger" him or whatever), he just wanted to trip him, which he did. Nuclear meltdown on here if it had happened to one of our players.
Facebook saying no red mmmmmmWas baffled last night when people were confused about it being a sending off.
View attachment 22825
Same here. I commented on the match thread saying that wasn't a read but looking at it back he tried to kick maatsen with his studs and it was relatively high too. Wasn't a case of just trippingThat was his intent but he actually made a really bad foul so although I agreed with you initially on second watching the ref got it right.
FWIW though I would like to see all cynical fouls that are designed to stop a break and make no attempt to get to the ball made red card offences.
Facebook saying no red mmmmmm
Glad I’m not the only onethat being said - I also weren’t surprised about not getting the penalty. They never get given
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?