Skyblueabo1111
Well-Known Member
Did you watch him against Sunderland?Wright did it again the season after and scored more in the league. He’s a better striker all round.
Did you watch him against Sunderland?Wright did it again the season after and scored more in the league. He’s a better striker all round.
Did you watch him against Sunderland?
Hard to judge..who has had the most minutes, on the pitch? I would guess Wright by a long stretch. In terms of goals v appearance..Wright 0.4 v Simms 0.33. However, I believe Wright has had many more minutes on the pitch. Whatever, I would start both. Haji left , Simms CF. The season they played together, they scored 38 goals! 2 players, both about 6'3 and it doesn't alter Frank's formation.Did you watch Simms all last season?
Wright is a consistent 1 in 2 striker for us.
NowhDid you watch Simms all last season?
Wright is a consistent 1 in 2 striker for us.
Hard to judge..who has had the most minutes, on the pitch? I would guess Wright by a long stretch. In terms of goals v appearance..Wright 0.4 v Simms 0.33. However, I believe Wright has had many more minutes on the pitch. Whatever, I would start both. Haji left , Simms CF. The season they played together, they scored 38 goals! 2 players, both about 6'3 and it doesn't alter Frank's formation.
Nowhere near 1 in 2. 78 appearances, 28 goals
Spot on. I don't get Frank .You have 2 players who scored 38 goals, in one season. Some in there cup..any other team in the Championship, would give their right arm for that. Main Clarke is good, but he isn't scoring 19 goals..See above. Appearances mean nothing when they can be 1 min or 130 min.
You basically get 2 strikers, that fit into Frank's formation. Seriously, I don't get it.Spot on. I don't get Frank .You have 2 players who scored 38 goals, in one season. Some in there cup..any other team in the Championship, would give their right arm for that. Main Clarke is good, but he isn't scoring 19 goals..
Good question. It makes Simms not getting any time even strangerWhy is he playing,if injured?
Why is he playing,if injured?
Why would you play a player who is injured?Lots of players up and down the leagues are playing when not fully fit. Especially important and gifted players. Clubs don't declare players are playing with knocks and strains for obvious reasons.
The level of unfitness can vary greatly, from a painful bruise, a strain that is painful for 10 minutes until you get warmed up and then is really painful and hour after you have played. Then injuries players play through managed by injections.
Players sat on the bench with injuries is even more complex. The advantage of a psychological presence and they can cope with giving us 15 minutes.
When you are sat up in the stands the game looks a lot less physical than it actually is. Players carry knocks from one game to the next before the body has healed and repaired.
A really good example is Josh Eccles dead leg at Sunderland. Nobody said oh that's really bad. But it was.
Why would you play a player who is injured?