Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

The penny drops for Presley (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter mattylad
  • Start date Jun 29, 2013
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
S

shy_tall_knight

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #36
3k crowds do yo think we will get that many away fans, stevenage crawley etc..
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #37
shy_tall_knight said:
I am all for FFP but if an owner wants to give a club money without increasing its debt then it should be allowed. High value long term deals offered to 2 injury prone players knowing that FFP was around the corner, only SISU would do this.
Click to expand...

99% of owners don't just give money to their clubs though do they? They loan it - look at Leicester £15m a year losses, etc they have built up £75m debt in 3 years, king power haven't given them money.

Look at the list of clubs that have gone into admin, spending above your means is bad, and encourages others to do it to try and compete. We're not in the PL, Bill Gates isn't our owner, and if anything we should be learning from our mistakes and not over spending on transfers and wages. Swansea have managed to do it.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #38
shy_tall_knight said:
Swindon got to thee play-offs though.
Click to expand...

They were able to sign players players and only went into an embargo for failure to meet ffp when the compensation levels for Collins and another player were set by the tribunal. They were only in it for a short time and sold Ritchie to bournemouth for £400k which meant the embargo was lifted.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #39
shy_tall_knight said:
3k crowds do yo think we will get that many away fans, stevenage crawley etc..
Click to expand...

Suppose we end up at Walsall with 1,000 ST holders and 2,000 walk-up.

1,000 STs at an average of £275= £275k.
2,000 walk-up at average £20 over 23 games= £920k.

Scant revenue from merchandising at the 'stall' gives us turnover more like £1.2m. To satisfy FFP on that we would have a wage bill of just over £700k. Pathetic.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #40
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Suppose we end up at Walsall with 1,000 ST holders and 2,000 walk-up.

1,000 STs at an average of £275= £275k.
2,000 walk-up at average £20 over 23 games= £920k.

Scant revenue from merchandising at the 'stall' gives us turnover more like £1.2m. To satisfy FFP on that we would have a wage bill of just over £700k. Pathetic.
Click to expand...

We will be at the Ricoh
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #41
stupot07 said:
We will be at the Ricoh
Click to expand...

Then let's get whatever needs to be signed signed so that we are in no doubt over it.
 
S

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #42
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Amazed that the odds are so high, SW-it's easy money!
Click to expand...

I wonder how much Otium/SISU directors have "invested" on that one?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #43
Brighton Sky Blue said:
They actually check budgetary information at regular intervals throughout the season so if we're getting crowds of 3,000 then we can expect sanctions on a wage bill of even £2m.
Click to expand...

Oh really? And I thought I finally understood it!
 
S

Sutty

Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #44
stupot07 said:
99% of owners don't just give money to their clubs though do they? They loan it - look at Leicester £15m a year losses, etc they have built up £75m debt in 3 years, king power haven't given them money.

Look at the list of clubs that have gone into admin, spending above your means is bad, and encourages others to do it to try and compete. We're not in the PL, Bill Gates isn't our owner, and if anything we should be learning from our mistakes and not over spending on transfers and wages. Swansea have managed to do it.
Click to expand...

Exactly.

For me, the problem under SISU has never been under-investment, other than the relegation season, which was farcical. In fact, you'd probably say Mark Robins was the most well-backed manager in our recent history. The problem has generally been bad investment. Even now we've got players sitting on fat contracts that their ability in no way justifies.

Yeovil showed last year that you don't have to spend more than the other teams at this level to succeed, you just need to spend what you can afford shrewdly.
 
S

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #45
shy_tall_knight said:
swindon were in breach of FFP but got to the play offs ? is a transfer embargo a price worth paying to get promoted.
Click to expand...

Seems to be worth avoiding filing accounts on time.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #46
shmmeee said:
Oh really? And I thought I finally understood it!
Click to expand...

Makes sense though-otherwise it would still allow clubs to overspend.
 
S

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #47
Brighton Sky Blue said:
They actually check budgetary information at regular intervals throughout the season so if we're getting crowds of 3,000 then we can expect sanctions on a wage bill of even £2m.
Click to expand...

They can put rules in to check whatever they want...if we don't send the information (past masters of that) they can't tell what we're doing!
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #48
SkyblueBazza said:
They can put rules in to check whatever they want...if we don't send the information (past masters of that) they can't tell what we're doing!
Click to expand...

Yeah, then we'll just get a transfer embargo until we do.
 
S

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #49
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Yeah, then we'll just get a transfer embargo until we do.
Click to expand...

We already have one. We have had them before for late filing of accounts - that's the point! We do not fear a transfer embargo.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #50
SkyblueBazza said:
We already have one. We have had them before for late filing of accounts - that's the point! We do not fear a transfer embargo.
Click to expand...

I suppose not. Indeed there seems to be a concerted effort by the owners, fans and even the manager to secure complete and utter humiliation for years to come.
 

ccfctommy

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #51
valiant15 said:
Andy thorn mk2.
Click to expand...

Based on what?
 
W

wozey

New Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #52
Is he expecting to last long in the job with that squad? Hope the players that he wants he gets or we are in trouble
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #53
wozey said:
Is he expecting to last long in the job with that squad? Hope the players that he wants he gets or we are in trouble
Click to expand...

However you look at It we're in trouble .There's a huge chance that this club will face further sanctions I'll be amazed if we get out of Admin before Christmas ,he may not last as long as some of these surplus players. If It pans out this way signing all these Kids may work against us as we would'nt be allowed to loan a team like Portsmouth sorry for the pessimism.
 
W

wozey

New Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #54
wingy said:
However you look at It we're in trouble .There's a huge chance that this club will face further sanctions I'll be amazed if we get out of Admin before Christmas ,he may not last as long as some of these surplus players. If It pans out this way signing all these Kids may work against us as we would'nt be allowed to loan a team like Portsmouth sorry for the pessimism.
Click to expand...

Pessimism and our club come hand-in-hand think you are right thou
 
S

StevieM

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #55
wingy said:
However you look at It we're in trouble .There's a huge chance that this club will face further sanctions I'll be amazed if we get out of Admin before Christmas ,he may not last as long as some of these surplus players. If It pans out this way signing all these Kids may work against us as we would'nt be allowed to loan a team like Portsmouth sorry for the pessimism.
Click to expand...

Portsmouth were allowed the signing of loanees and players on month long contracts because the FL thought that teams caning Pompey U-18's 6-0 every week wasn't in the spirit of the "beautiful game".
Hopefully they may look at our "Sky Blue babes" in the same light and cut us a bit of slack, or better still tell Opium to f**k right off!!
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #56
Grendel said:
Only 2 of them are likely to be on that much. Three definitely will not be. Players are moved on a the time and this is no different. Interestingly when the popular sisu puppet thorn did to Eastwood it was a sign of strong management. This is apparently weak and misguided.

Mcsheffrey and bell are often ridiculed and lampooned on here so no one should be surprised. Malaga was exiled last season and Jennings has been poor. Dunne needs a new club anyway. I may have kept the other one (edjuingele)

These players know the score. Their agents will be trying to secure contracts elsewhere and if we can get rid of at least 4 the excercise will have been worth it. Season long loans elsewhere are also an option.
Click to expand...

When fit Bell is probably our best player, as he showed at the end of last season.

I suppose they have to save money somewhere though.
 

deanocity3

New Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #57
stupot07 said:
Interesting that you neglected to say that they will train separately from the squad, so no they're not back in the fold..

They will train separately from the manager’s chosen squad as the club tries to offload the likes of Gary McSheffrey and Steve Jennings in a summer when the wage bill will drop from more than £4million a year to around £2m.

“The situation is they will return to the group on Monday and go through a similar sort of pre-season,” said Pressley of the players.

“I think they are all working towards finding other clubs and we’re trying to negotiate certain players out of the football club.
Click to expand...

players back for training,though's who are not fit enough should bring a note from their mum.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 29, 2013
  • #58
deanocity3 said:
players back for training,though's who are not fit enough should bring a note from their mum.
Click to expand...

Fleck must have tried to forge his mums signature judging by the yo-yo fitness test...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?