The penny drops for Presley (1 Viewer)

stupot07

Well-Known Member
I am all for FFP but if an owner wants to give a club money without increasing its debt then it should be allowed. High value long term deals offered to 2 injury prone players knowing that FFP was around the corner, only SISU would do this.

99% of owners don't just give money to their clubs though do they? They loan it - look at Leicester £15m a year losses, etc they have built up £75m debt in 3 years, king power haven't given them money.

Look at the list of clubs that have gone into admin, spending above your means is bad, and encourages others to do it to try and compete. We're not in the PL, Bill Gates isn't our owner, and if anything we should be learning from our mistakes and not over spending on transfers and wages. Swansea have managed to do it.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Swindon got to thee play-offs though.

They were able to sign players players and only went into an embargo for failure to meet ffp when the compensation levels for Collins and another player were set by the tribunal. They were only in it for a short time and sold Ritchie to bournemouth for £400k which meant the embargo was lifted.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
3k crowds do yo think we will get that many away fans, stevenage crawley etc..

Suppose we end up at Walsall with 1,000 ST holders and 2,000 walk-up.

1,000 STs at an average of £275= £275k.
2,000 walk-up at average £20 over 23 games= £920k.

Scant revenue from merchandising at the 'stall' gives us turnover more like £1.2m. To satisfy FFP on that we would have a wage bill of just over £700k. Pathetic.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Suppose we end up at Walsall with 1,000 ST holders and 2,000 walk-up.

1,000 STs at an average of £275= £275k.
2,000 walk-up at average £20 over 23 games= £920k.

Scant revenue from merchandising at the 'stall' gives us turnover more like £1.2m. To satisfy FFP on that we would have a wage bill of just over £700k. Pathetic.

We will be at the Ricoh
 

Sutty

Member
99% of owners don't just give money to their clubs though do they? They loan it - look at Leicester £15m a year losses, etc they have built up £75m debt in 3 years, king power haven't given them money.

Look at the list of clubs that have gone into admin, spending above your means is bad, and encourages others to do it to try and compete. We're not in the PL, Bill Gates isn't our owner, and if anything we should be learning from our mistakes and not over spending on transfers and wages. Swansea have managed to do it.

Exactly.

For me, the problem under SISU has never been under-investment, other than the relegation season, which was farcical. In fact, you'd probably say Mark Robins was the most well-backed manager in our recent history. The problem has generally been bad investment. Even now we've got players sitting on fat contracts that their ability in no way justifies.

Yeovil showed last year that you don't have to spend more than the other teams at this level to succeed, you just need to spend what you can afford shrewdly.
 

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
They actually check budgetary information at regular intervals throughout the season so if we're getting crowds of 3,000 then we can expect sanctions on a wage bill of even £2m.

They can put rules in to check whatever they want...if we don't send the information (past masters of that) they can't tell what we're doing!
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
We already have one. We have had them before for late filing of accounts - that's the point! We do not fear a transfer embargo.

I suppose not. Indeed there seems to be a concerted effort by the owners, fans and even the manager to secure complete and utter humiliation for years to come.
 

wozey

New Member
Is he expecting to last long in the job with that squad? Hope the players that he wants he gets or we are in trouble
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Is he expecting to last long in the job with that squad? Hope the players that he wants he gets or we are in trouble

However you look at It we're in trouble .There's a huge chance that this club will face further sanctions I'll be amazed if we get out of Admin before Christmas ,he may not last as long as some of these surplus players. If It pans out this way signing all these Kids may work against us as we would'nt be allowed to loan a team like Portsmouth sorry for the pessimism.:(
 

wozey

New Member
However you look at It we're in trouble .There's a huge chance that this club will face further sanctions I'll be amazed if we get out of Admin before Christmas ,he may not last as long as some of these surplus players. If It pans out this way signing all these Kids may work against us as we would'nt be allowed to loan a team like Portsmouth sorry for the pessimism.:(

Pessimism and our club come hand-in-hand think you are right thou
 

StevieM

Well-Known Member
However you look at It we're in trouble .There's a huge chance that this club will face further sanctions I'll be amazed if we get out of Admin before Christmas ,he may not last as long as some of these surplus players. If It pans out this way signing all these Kids may work against us as we would'nt be allowed to loan a team like Portsmouth sorry for the pessimism.:(

Portsmouth were allowed the signing of loanees and players on month long contracts because the FL thought that teams caning Pompey U-18's 6-0 every week wasn't in the spirit of the "beautiful game".
Hopefully they may look at our "Sky Blue babes" in the same light and cut us a bit of slack, or better still tell Opium to f**k right off!!
 

mark82

Moderator
Only 2 of them are likely to be on that much. Three definitely will not be. Players are moved on a the time and this is no different. Interestingly when the popular sisu puppet thorn did to Eastwood it was a sign of strong management. This is apparently weak and misguided.

Mcsheffrey and bell are often ridiculed and lampooned on here so no one should be surprised. Malaga was exiled last season and Jennings has been poor. Dunne needs a new club anyway. I may have kept the other one (edjuingele)

These players know the score. Their agents will be trying to secure contracts elsewhere and if we can get rid of at least 4 the excercise will have been worth it. Season long loans elsewhere are also an option.

When fit Bell is probably our best player, as he showed at the end of last season.

I suppose they have to save money somewhere though.
 

deanocity3

New Member
Interesting that you neglected to say that they will train separately from the squad, so no they're not back in the fold..

They will train separately from the manager’s chosen squad as the club tries to offload the likes of Gary McSheffrey and Steve Jennings in a summer when the wage bill will drop from more than £4million a year to around £2m.

“The situation is they will return to the group on Monday and go through a similar sort of pre-season,” said Pressley of the players.

“I think they are all working towards finding other clubs and we’re trying to negotiate certain players out of the football club.

players back for training,though's who are not fit enough should bring a note from their mum.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top