L G been away missed it . djr 8369 Where were we (Sisu) playing 30 odd miles away because we wouldn't pay a legally agreed deal in place when they took over.I don't know if you live in Coventry (i don't) but if i did would not want my council having a stadium draiining resources waiting for a hedge fund to come back, hill83 as you see don't live in the city never met the guy this is my opinion you have yours. covmark clown maybe but yes. Sorry the ferret didn't mean all the money, rent already dealt with that aswering L G saddling us with Sisu maybe covboy " 3 months" in that time they will still be sitting at the bottom of our league if they still exit championship i think not.Like to say evening son i see you are on here
I hate the fact that Wasps are in our stadium. I hate their logos, their flags, their club shop ( that used to be ours), their ticket office. I hate the fact that their games are on CWR, that their stories and reports are in the Telegraph. I look for their results and it pleases me when they lose (childish I know). I hope they go bust and take themselves back to their real fan base in the south east. Wasps should not be here. They are a franchise club every bit as bad as MK. Anyone who reads my posts knows this has always been my point of view.Pretty much sums it up.
The FL need to clarify now what is the next step for the club. Whatever is going on or no matter what is spouted on here is not important. What is being overlooked due to some scrambling to find an i told you so moment is finding out purely for the fans to know what the FL knew and what is next.
They've already agreed heads of terms on a groundThe club are trying to push through the groundshare. Thats next.
That failed bid for a judicial review argued Coventry City Council had undervalued the stadium operating company when Wasps bought it for around £20million in 2014
What was it about £8-9mCan we just take a minute to review the opening paragraph on the shitty “what could happen with the EC complaint” on the telegraph site:
Come on now....that is just outrageous. Aren’t there laws about what papers can write?
What was it about £8-9m
Can we just take a minute to review the opening paragraph on the shitty “what could happen with the EC complaint” on the telegraph site:
Come on now....that is just outrageous. Aren’t there laws about what papers can write?
Didn’t wasps take on the 14 million debt? That would be the 20 million.
If it’s undervalued - it’ll be after a EC investigation and they won’t use a local rag as evidence
No but the telegraph has always taken licence with semanticsThat isn't the purchase price.
Can you point to a single post where I have absolved SISU of blame? You seem to have forgotten that in the past I have been called a council lover and accused of being a council employee!The fact is that everyone of the major players is at fault. Why don’t you say this instead of trying to diminish the part Sisu play in all of this?
Can you explain how an EC commission investigation into CCC leaves Wasps with legal fees?Sisu’s latest action has the potential to cost Wasps a fortune in legal fees, even if they are innocent of the state aid claim.
Again, something you have completely made up. Nobody has said that or thinks that.Now, thanks to you and your like minded gang on here, some now see them as the seekers of truth and justice.
Really? Have you been through my entire post history or is that just something you've made up?[/QUOTE]There are far more negative posts from you about the Trust than there are about Sisu.
Didn’t wasps take on the 14 million debt? That would be the 20 million.
If it’s undervalued - it’ll be after a EC investigation and they won’t use a local rag as evidence
is there no hope of talks resuming
Keith I think is not an accountant - the debt is a charge to the business so it’s irrelevant and I assume the current valuation of £60 million is a valuation that considers all charges to the business
I would guess it’s like when a club is sold for £1 plus debts. You don’t say it was sold for £x the club was sold for £1.
OMG he’s the editor of the Coventry Telegraph?
If you go to a bank for a mortgage and tell them you've found a house for £200k, £100k for the house and £100k money owed to your other half they'd laugh you out the building. Why are they allowed to get away with this ludicrous claim.
[/QUOTE]What a thoroughly bizarre post ISB. Not sure why you've waited months to respond to a post on a different thread about stewarding, not really the priority at the moment.
Can you point to a single post where I have absolved SISU of blame? You seem to have forgotten that in the past I have been called a council lover and accused of being a council employee!
Can you explain how an EC commission investigation into CCC leaves Wasps with legal fees?
Again, something you have completely made up. Nobody has said that or thinks that.
Really? Have you been through my entire post history or is that just something you've made up?
He point blank denied the Telegraph had surpassed the story on the bail out of ACL to me earlier in the week despite there's being evidence present to the council's ethics committee. Presumably he things SISU's lawyers forged the evidence.OMG he’s the editor of the Coventry Telegraph?
Maybe you can point out where I, and the vast majority of people on this thread, are wrong. Clearly you have insight the rest of us don't. I'll make it easy for you.Look back through your comments on this thread alone. Even handed? Proportioning blame fairly? I don’t think so. Reading your comments it would seem that after Wasps, the biggest threat to CCFC would be the Trust.
“the ball was back in the court of CCFC’s owners”
Anybody pick up on this from wasps? What exactly can they do now that it isn't possible to withdraw the complaint. It seems as if wasps don't want us at the ricoh full stop which is a piss take
It’s a tactic to push blame. Whilst SISU are owners of CCFC, in my opinion Wasps have no interest whatsoever of forming a relationship, unless SISU and the club completely abide by their terms of course.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?