The nature of a football club (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Deleted member 5849
  • Start date

Sky Blue Dal

Well-Known Member
Swansea, forest, Ipswich, Doncaster, hull - that enough for you?


Just wondering .... Do you know how there contracts are written, whats in them and whats been agreed between the two parties?? ..... maybe there owners did some shrewd rent agreements with there council (which is most likely). The fact Grendel, is that not all contracted rental agreements that these clubs have are the same. They probably have owners who are more competent than ours. Even now when they are offered a rent free, they twaddle of 35 miles away to play in a sub standard ground and pay rent.

You couldn't make it up!!!
 

Last edited:

Sky Blue Dal

Well-Known Member
That's the wider problem, isn't it.

Back in the days when a club was owned for ego/putting something back into the community (OK, mostly ego) then there was a sense of the need for competition in the rules.

Now, when convicted money launderers have a burning desire to own a club in the Midlands: http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/mar/03/birmingham-city-owner-carson-yeung-guilty the rules get changed for self interest.

Before, the self interest was the competition. Now? It's the need for cash.

But we don't have to buy into that, do we?

That is the dark side of capitalism my friends ....
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
So the moral of this thread is: piracy of football streams will save football?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top