My understanding is only post something if you know it to be the truth
My understanding is only post something if you know it to be the truth
If people repeat it online and it is false or they can't prove it, of course there can be comeback on them.
My understanding is only post something if you know it to be the truth
Surely if you're quoting him you don't have to prove truth in what you are quoting just that he said it?
If there was only two people in the meeting it would be one persons word against another and that would go nowhere. If there were more people in the meeting every single other person would have to cover up for ML which seems unlikely.
Don't think anybody is nervous about it, posted what i thought about it a couple of weeks ago, doesn't make it a conspiracy.
Stop demanding that everybody posts hearsay from meetings then!
And can prove it to be true in a court of law
From memory if you're stating something as fact, as opposed to quoting something someone else said, its something vague like you have to have reason to believe it is true.
Lord
You posted that you found it a bit of a waste of time.
You never really said what you asked and what answers you got?
Did ask questions or was it just all one way traffic?
Also you did wait a few days till it came out on here, before you mentioned that you had been to the meeting.
Why did you not mention it on here straight away. You must know that people would definitely have been interested in your meeting?
Lord
You posted that you found it a bit of a waste of time.
You never really said what you asked and what answers you got?
Did ask questions or was it just all one way traffic?
Also you did wait a few days till it came out on here, before you mentioned that you had been to the meeting.
Why did you not mention it on here straight away. You must know that people would definitely have been interested in your meeting?
It not hearsay if you are posting what ML said to you and that is all you are posting.
Lord
You posted that you found it a bit of a waste of time.
You never really said what you asked and what answers you got?
Did ask questions or was it just all one way traffic?
Also you did wait a few days till it came out on here, before you mentioned that you had been to the meeting.
Why did you not mention it on here straight away. You must know that people would definitely have been interested in your meeting?
Don't think anybody is nervous about it, posted what i thought about it a couple of weeks ago, doesn't make it a conspiracy.
Was little point really, nothing concrete to say from it, and thought if mentioned it would just be accusations of "usual suspects" etc, which there were a few of.
Relieved that it was LAST who broke cover first, as only the most paranoid mentalist could accuse him of being pro-Sisu!
To be fair it was Grendel who could no longer hold on and broke ranks, then it was like an AA meeting one by one
They did well to keep silent for a few days though
If ML said it there can be no comeback on you or your cousin. If he said it and it wasn't true then the person or organisation he was being untruthful about could take action against ML directly. If your cousin was the only one in the meeting then ML could claim to have never said it, one persons word against another so that would go nowhere, if more than one person was at the meeting then unless they're all going to perjure themselves to cover for him he wouldn't be able to claim it hadn't been said.
To be fair it was Grendel who could no longer hold on and broke ranks, then it was like an AA meeting one by one
They did well to keep silent for a few days though
Something I have just been informed of has disappointed me greatly. Nick, LS Grendel and another member of this site had a meeting with ML. This is fine but from such vocal people on this forum they didnt even give us supporters any chance to offer any questions which could of been asked. As soon as I find out any infomation i have let my fellow supporters know through this channel of communication. Its disappointing that none of the above didnt ask for questions but also tried to hide this.
Something I have just been informed of has disappointed me greatly. Nick, LS Grendel and another member of this site had a meeting with ML. This is fine but from such vocal people on this forum they didnt even give us supporters any chance to offer any questions which could of been asked. As soon as I find out any infomation i have let my fellow supporters know through this channel of communication. Its disappointing that none of the above didnt ask for questions but also tried to hide this.
Something I have just been informed of has disappointed me greatly. Nick, LS Grendel and another member of this site had a meeting with ML. This is fine but from such vocal people on this forum they didnt even give us supporters any chance to offer any questions which could of been asked. As soon as I find out any infomation i have let my fellow supporters know through this channel of communication. Its disappointing that none of the above didnt ask for questions but also tried to hide this.
Something I have just been informed of has disappointed me greatly. Nick, LS Grendel and another member of this site had a meeting with ML. This is fine but from such vocal people on this forum they didnt even give us supporters any chance to offer any questions which could of been asked. As soon as I find out any infomation i have let my fellow supporters know through this channel of communication. Its disappointing that none of the above didnt ask for questions but also tried to hide this.
I don't see how in practice that would have worked. It wasn't arranged until the day before attending.
It was supposed to have been a discussion on the structure if a forum. It didn't quite turn out that way and there was a lot of information presented.
The information presented was random and potentially in some cases libellous. One reference in particular was very outlandish. It was in confidence but I suspect was intended to be leaked. Its not appropriate for discussion.
As it has now already been mentioned Michael Byng attended the meeting I was in.
Out of interest, what were your credentials for being a chosen one?
Intelligence and impartiality?
MMM, there is a thread titled Fans Forum which will tell you everything
People are making out that it is only people from here who met him, the fact there were 20 - 30 meetings and people from here made up probably 2.
I'll have a shufty, and put it down to happenchance that such a narrow demographic of opinion was afforded such an interaction.....
Yes, you can put it down to what you like but as you obviously don't know the demographic it will just make you look like you are making silly assumptions
Yes, you can put it down to what you like but as you obviously don't know the demographic it will just make you look like you are making silly assumptions
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?