The person who posted the thread. Completely off his own back and having recieived no nudges from anyone else deleted his post.
Shame if what he said was the truth only his cousin knows, it would have been a fascinating insight for most people.
The person who posted the thread. Completely off his own back and having recieived no nudges from anyone else deleted his post.
Shame if what he said was the truth only his cousin knows, it would have been a fascinating insight for most people.
I didn't find it very fascinating -- what stuck out for you then?
The fella said that he had spoken to ML and alleged that it was ML's view that CCC would lose the JR but that confidence isn't shared by TF or JS.
He also alleged that ML stated that he believes CCC will settle a deal with the club on the court steps.
Straight question Nick, did you ask him to take it down, and if so why?
.
Funnily enough, I've got a screenshot of it - I'd actually left the window open because I was composing a reply to it. I won't publish it on the assumption that the OP doesn't want it published for some reason.
Straight question Nick, did you ask him to take it down, and if so why?
I can understand why ML might want to hold small meetings to gauge opinion and put across the club's point of view in a less hostile environment, and I was invited to one but could not attend. As I said then, my concern was that there would be a requirement for secrecy regarding what was said.
If taking down that thread was a result of that insistence by the parties involved, then frankly I think the whole process was simply more spin and bullshit and I'm glad I didn't go. I sincerely hope I've got that wrong.
Nope, he edited the post himself and then asked me to get rid.
Straight answer from Nick yesterday: No, OP took it down himself without being asked to.
I posted the thread. The reason i had taken it down was because my my cousin who attended the meeting views this website and told me to do so. He said that SISU and the council monitor this site and because of what i wrote was not minuted during the meeting there is no proof of what I said is the truth and i open myself up for legal repercussions. Like i said on the thread, it doesnt matter to me whether anyone believes what was wrote, it was just some information from someone who i trust who i know wouldnt lie about what was said. How much of what was said by labovitch is the truth I obviously do not know but i am sure that he said what he did.
Oh, and look who mysteriously appears when I mention the deleted account!!! You're quick, Nick!!! Real quick!!!
Only person i know of who asks administrators for posts to be removed or PM's asking for them to be removed is from the opposite side of the fence to ML.
Though sure it has happened on occasion the other way too.
Or to summarise what was said at the non secret meetings is actually secret.
I posted the thread. The reason i had taken it down was because my my cousin who attended the meeting views this website and told me to do so. He said that SISU and the council monitor this site and because of what i wrote was not minuted during the meeting there is no proof of what I said is the truth and i open myself up for legal repercussions. Like i said on the thread, it doesnt matter to me whether anyone believes what was wrote, it was just some information from someone who i trust who i know wouldnt lie about what was said. How much of what was said by labovitch is the truth I obviously do not know but i am sure that he said what he did.
Thanks
Or just one side of the story, and nobody wants to just put across one side without supporting evidence?
Which is fair enough, and I respect that.
I don't respect anyone who threatens legal action based on someone reporting what was said to them in a meeting though - that's not right to my mind. Either you speak openly to people, or you don't. The cloak and dagger and legal threats stuff does no one any credit.
I don't respect anyone who threatens legal action based on someone reporting what was said to them in a meeting though - that's not right to my mind. Either you speak openly to people, or you don't. The cloak and dagger and legal threats stuff does no one any credit.
Who has threatened legal action in this case?
No one yet, perhaps - but it seems we're in an environment where people are nervous about posting information about ML meeting with fans. Why is that, I wonder?
I posted the thread. The reason i had taken it down was because my my cousin who attended the meeting views this website and told me to do so. He said that SISU and the council monitor this site and because of what i wrote was not minuted during the meeting there is no proof of what I said is the truth and i open myself up for legal repercussions. Like i said on the thread, it doesnt matter to me whether anyone believes what was wrote, it was just some information from someone who i trust who i know wouldnt lie about what was said. How much of what was said by labovitch is the truth I obviously do not know but i am sure that he said what he did.
Thanks
I am 100% certain that what he said he said:facepalm:
Now wether he said what was in your post is the question at hand.:thinking about:
Yes im 100% sure he said what i wrote in his post, but just because he said something doesnt mean its the truth. I dont believe most things that these tossers say. But something i thought would be good to share
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?