I'm happy enough with him claiming it ,was a good cross ,he missed it by a smidgen by the looks of it while it was 4-5 inches off the ground,his movement and positional sense ,which seem instinctive were enough to spook the Oldham defenders ,enough for the error to result with a goal.It was surprising he was trying to head the ball that low but possibly the only way he thought he would reach it.
Don't know, but maybe he only got given it as the videprinters etc were down. Info wasn't getting through. No corrections, etc.
Got me confused with someone else, Wingy! I say there's no option to terminate loans, but that's the only area in which I've quoted rules.
if he gets to goal scorer at the end of the season doubt he will but if he does and it's due to that then banter but if not then who cares
Who cares. Don't understand why some people would like to see the goal taken off him! Let him have it and boost his confidence.
I don't care how they go in, or who gets them. But when you get them like that, you can't claim it as your goal just because it makes you feel good! If that was the case, Murphy may aswell have tried to claim it!
Is the rule not something like; if the oppo. players intervention completely changes the direction of the ball then it has to be given as an own goal? In any case.....who cares. We won and thank God for that
doesnt even look like he touched it lol but im sure he did and it was on target!
well done cody!
well done cody!