No he hasn't.
So what part of anyone or any organisation who has done wrong needs looking into and problem resolved/reversed/prosecuted don't you understand?
Or would you like to point out where I have defended him in the slightest?
You always defend the reason why he should keep the position that he shouldn't have.Who is defending Selmayr? I posted the argument of the EC, and asked what happened in the end. There a couple of versions out there and I thought you claimed to know what happened. You just said it happened.
So you think we will fully leave? I'm not so sure.The factions making sure of it are mostly within the UK and May's own red lines - she has boxed herself into a corner that I don't think she will be able to get out of.
I was mocked on here before by leavers for claiming it would take at least a decade for the UK to fully leave
So you think we will fully leave? I'm not so sure.
So you think we will fully leave? I'm not so sure.
Depends what you mean. Joining the EEA - as originally championed by Farage - would technically be fully leaving the EU but he and others have since moved the goalposts.
But he has nowhere near as much power as Selmayr. His appointment was a joke. And what have you said on the subject?I have not said you're defending him but wherever their is power there is always going to be some level or wrongdoing or corruption to a certain extent.
The fact he is in such a powerful position is alarming, and that's before taking his previous behaviour into account.
May was always going to have a hard time. Nobody trusts her.The DUP are unlikely to make concessions. Mrs. May has, as I understand it, 'bent' her red lines. What concessions has the EU given? Genuine question, not trying to start an arguement.
The DUP are unlikely to make concessions. Mrs. May has, as I understand it, 'bent' her red lines. What concessions has the EU given? Genuine question, not trying to start an arguement.
You always defend the reason why he should keep the position that he shouldn't have.
May was always going to have a hard time. Nobody trusts her.
She was a remainer so leavers don't trust her. She is leading us out of the EU so remainers don't trust her. She is trying to put together a plan that is straight down the middle to keep everyone happy. But people are more interested in what they don't like than what they do like.
No concessions from the EU at all so far. All we have had is them playing hardball and refusing to negotiate.
But Carney has just said again that they are not preparing for a no deal situation. So are they ready to have talks or are they just plain old incompetent?
Although yesterday they did say that they were getting ready for a no deal situation. But it seems they hadn't thought about the consequences on their side. Our banks are prepared. If they do nothing their financial side will collapse. And they don't have much time to do anything about it.
The DUP are unlikely to make concessions. Mrs. May has, as I understand it, 'bent' her red lines. What concessions has the EU given? Genuine question, not trying to start an arguement.
Mart, I think that he is blaming the 27 for the inactions of the 27 if they are not preparing for a 'no deal' scenario. Whoever is to blame for the costs and problems is irrelevant in the context of preparedness.They. You are referring to 27 nations. Some claim to be more prepared than others. But, the whole thing is down to us. All costs and problems were caused by us. Now you are on to blame the 27 for the actions of the 1. The one only being actually half for the whole crap. It is really 0,5 countries causing problems for 27,5 countries. A joke.
Mart, I think that he is blaming the 27 for the inactions of the 27 if they are not preparing for a 'no deal' scenario. Whoever is to blame for the costs and problems is irrelevant in the context of preparedness.
Well, for a start, she wanted to remove the interference of the ECJ. That's not going to happen now.Which lines has she bent? I don't think she has.
I don't think that we are ready, but are getting ready. Astute seems to think that the 27 are not ready or taking steps to get ready.I'm not sure why anyone would think we're ready for a no deal scenario.
A quick Google pulls up many reports, Some produced by government agencies which detail why we aren't.
Well, for a start, she wanted to remove the interference of the ECJ. That's not going to happen now.
I don't think that we are ready, but are getting ready. Astute seems to think that the 27 are not ready or taking steps to get ready.
May was always going to have a hard time. Nobody trusts her.
She was a remainer so leavers don't trust her. She is leading us out of the EU so remainers don't trust her. She is trying to put together a plan that is straight down the middle to keep everyone happy. But people are more interested in what they don't like than what they do like.
No concessions from the EU at all so far. All we have had is them playing hardball and refusing to negotiate.
But Carney has just said again that they are not preparing for a no deal situation. So are they ready to have talks or are they just plain old incompetent?
Although yesterday they did say that they were getting ready for a no deal situation. But it seems they hadn't thought about the consequences on their side. Our banks are prepared. If they do nothing their financial side will collapse. And they don't have much time to do anything about it.
I thought that if there is a deal, the ECJ would still have a say in matters concerning EU citizens living in UK.It will in the case on a no deal. Even if a deal is struck I think the ECJ will have no more say in UK matters.
Mart, I think that he is blaming the 27 for the inactions of the 27 if they are not preparing for a 'no deal' scenario. Whoever is to blame for the costs and problems is irrelevant in the context of preparedness.
Sticking to their agreed negotiating guide lines seems to mean making no concessions. I already asked what concessions the EU have made and cannot think of any. Their negotiations seem to consist of rejecting UK's ideas and asking them to be changed, without any suggestions as to what would be acceptable.They're not playing hardball, they are sticking to their agreed negotiating guide lines. Some of us didn't expect them to roll over and give into the UK's demands.
I don't think that we are ready, but are getting ready. Astute seems to think that the 27 are not ready or taking steps to get ready.
That's like being a married man! :emoji_smile:and if things go wrong we will be blamed.
Sticking to their agreed negotiating guide lines seems to mean making no concessions. I already asked what concessions the EU have made and cannot think of any. Their negotiations seem to consist of rejecting UK's ideas and asking them to be changed, without any suggestions as to what would be acceptable.
Sticking to their agreed negotiating guide lines seems to mean making no concessions. I already asked what concessions the EU have made and cannot think of any. Their negotiations seem to consist of rejecting UK's ideas and asking them to be changed, without any suggestions as to what would be acceptable.
Sticking to their agreed negotiating guide lines seems to mean making no concessions. I already asked what concessions the EU have made and cannot think of any. Their negotiations seem to consist of rejecting UK's ideas and asking them to be changed, without any suggestions as to what would be acceptable.
That's like being a married man! :emoji_smile:
Article 50 was added by the EU during these negotiations?Isn’t the concession article 50? For the EU to be making no concessions there wouldn’t be a mechanism to leave.
It was written years ago. By an Englishman!Article 50 was added by the EU during these negotiations?
Then that is hardly a concession by the EU in these negotiations, is it?It was written years ago. By an Englishman!
It was written years ago. By an Englishman!
The concession is a mechanism to leave. The mechanics of leaving has been known for some time and leave should be about following article 50. Not article 50 except this or article 50 plus that. It’s hardly breaking news.Then that is hardly a concession by the EU in these negotiations, is it?
Then that is hardly a concession by the EU in these negotiations, is it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?