But Mart says the AfD is nothing in Germany
Is that your way of saying that a pro EU paper is wrong when saying things that could be seen as against the EU?
They would almost certainly leave the country rather than serve in the army. Win-Win.
„They“ as in „us and them“?
Those who are pro EU like yourself only look at lies on one side and try their best to ignore the lies on the other side and the bending of the rules by those in the EU. So of course that is all you see.I have not said anything else, but I wouldn’t be so deluded to say that this proves that the EU always bends rules to the limit.
Brexit is actually attracting more attention to the failings and lies of the Brexiteers than the EU in relation to the size of the U.K. against that of the EU.
The AfD are the largest party in opposition. Yet you make out that they are nothing.Yes. The AFD has 96 seats in Parliament, but they are not in the coalition. The SPD is in the coalition. The SPD claims that forcing people to do service, military or community, is Zwangsarbeit, forced labour, and is against the constitution. Any such idea would first have to be checked against the constitution and to change the constitution you need a two thirds majority ( no 52:48 crap here on important issues ).
Not at all. Your normal line when a paper or any media outlet says something you don't like is they are anti EU rants. But you k ow you can't say that against the Guardian. They are as pro EU as you can get.What could be seen as against the EU? The Guardian says that the idea is seen as a „populist“ attempt to unite the CDU. The mention of „populist“ infers that the Guardian holds an anti populist opinion.
Yet you would be spitting feathers if the UK did something similar.„They“ as in „us and them“? Personally, I think it is just bs. An idea in the „Sommerloch“ when nothing is going on.
Got a few headlines at the beginning of August, and will be put to bed now. Many refugees are frustrated at the difficulties getting a decent job as they have to wait 6 weeks for the job centre to confirm that there are no German citizens for the job. Usually the job has gone by then, or it is a job which no one wants ( e.g. delivering parcels up flights of stairs in German apartment blocks for little money ). I suspect some would do community service to help their CV and improve their German.
UK 'threats' over Indian Ocean islands
“The dispute over the Chagos Islands - home to the US military base on Diego Garcia - is being portrayed by some as an indication of Britain's waning influence on the world stage following the Brexit vote.”
Not at all. Your normal line when a paper or any media outlet says something you don't like is they are anti EU rants. But you k ow you can't say that against the Guardian. They are as pro EU as you can get.
So Britain should abandon control over its own affairs in order to have more influence over other countries' affairs?
Yet you would be spitting feathers if the UK did something similar.
The AfD are the largest party in opposition. Yet you make out that they are nothing.
So Britain should abandon control over its own affairs in order to have more influence over other countries' affairs?
Have I missed something?
I wasn't referring to Mauritius but to the suggestion that Britain was 'losing its influence on the world stage since Brexit', as you well know.Mauritius just wants to take back control. Something I’m sure all brexiteers will support them on.
Talking crap again hey Mart?The papers you quote normally have anti EU rants. I don’t see anything anti EU in your link. I don’t know why you are having a go st me because I cannot see anything anti EU.
No. Britain is taking back control if it's own affairs. And you don't like it.Have I missed something? Britain is giving up control of it’s own affairs?
Germany is doing what it can to stop them from going there. And is making it as difficult as it can for those who are already there. True?Nothing has happened and I haven’t given an opinion on the idea either way. I just said I think that at least some refugees would take it up for a year even if they weren’t forced to.
It doesn't only apply to so-called 'refugees' but also to young people born in Germany such as your daughter.Nothing has happened and I haven’t given an opinion on the idea either way. I just said I think that at least some refugees would take it up for a year even if they weren’t forced to.
I agree that something should happen. But not knowing the whole case doesn't make it easy to guess about.Mauritius just wants to take back control. Something I’m sure all brexiteers will support them on.
But they can still vote on the issue and that may be enough to tilt the result in favour of compulsory conscription (assuming that CDU/CSU doesn't already have a majority on the issue)..They are not in power and no one want to be in a coalition with them.
But Mart says that the AfD has no say in Germany and they are nothingBut they can still vote on the issue and that may be enough to tilt the result in favour of compulsory conscription (assuming that CDU/CSU doesn't already have a majority on the issue)..
I wasn't referring to Mauritius but to the suggestion that Britain was 'losing its influence on the world stage since Brexit', as you well know.
Read again.Well EU countries chose to use their veto when the UN voted on the subject giving Mauritius the opportunity to peruse this through The Hague whereas EU countries usually back each other in such situations. In essence we seem to have lost some automatic allies because ties with the EU are being cut and assumed solitary with a large proportion of the UN is being lost as an effect of that.
Mauritius is a commonwealth country. Does our weakened status mean we can also no longer expect the commonwealth countries support? Mauritius certainly doesn’t think so as they suddenly feel empowered to challenge us after 50 years of lip service disapproval on the issue.
We’re suddenly looking like a loner in the UN.
But Mart says that the AfD has no say in Germany and they are nothing
Undoubtedly Britain has had reducing influence on the world stage. It has been happening for a long long time now. It is called progress...it is inevitable. Like as a child grows up, forms it's own opinions & way in life.Well EU countries chose to use their veto when the UN voted on the subject giving Mauritius the opportunity to peruse this through The Hague whereas EU countries usually back each other in such situations. In essence we seem to have lost some automatic allies because ties with the EU are being cut and assumed solitary with a large proportion of the UN is being lost as an effect of that.
Mauritius is a commonwealth country. Does our weakened status mean we can also no longer expect the commonwealth countries support? Mauritius certainly doesn’t think so as they suddenly feel empowered to challenge us after 50 years of lip service disapproval on the issue.
We’re suddenly looking like a loner in the UN.
Undoubtedly Britain has had reducing influence on the world stage. It has been happening for a long long time now. It is called progress...it is inevitable. Like as a child grows up, forms it's own opinions & way in life.
Britain used to bully it's way around the world until the stark realisation that by helping those influenced massively by it to develop, you actually lose influence over them.
As for EU spitefulness with the veto...that is the EU trying to make a bit of a bullying point to thd UK. Wonder how the the EU will vote if/when the disputed (with France) Tromelin Island comes to the fore?
As for Mauritius itself, I have little doubt that as things stand they will want UK/US defence assurances into the bargain as well. That is probably where the so called 'threats' arise.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Read again.
They have wanted to get their land back for many years. Yet now it is all to do with Brexit. Would you like to explain?
EU spitefulness? It was two countries within the EU who vetoed not a blanket EU veto.
I would have thought that any brexiteer would support Mauritius in taking back control of its sovereign land. Surprised that you’re using words like spiteful to describe any country supporting Mauritius on this. If you can count a veto as support, it’s more a sign of not wanting to get involved whereas previously EU loyalties may have meant that said countries felt honour bound to support the U.K. and now don’t have to get involved with U.K. affairs. Ironically I thought that’s what brexit wanted.
Smacks of double standards all around here. Pointing the finger at Eu countries for not getting involved with U.K. matters in stark contrast to the brexit campaign and then not showing solidarity with another country that just wants what the brexit campaign wants.
Well according to him they were never going to win more than a handful of seats in last years election.
94 is quite a handful.
Yes, forty-five years of history.
This happens in the UK? = 'divided nation'Well according to him they were never going to win more than a handful of seats in last years election.
94 is quite a handful.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?