Would our anger be better directed towards ACL/COUNCIL? Is it not the case that these two entities have metorphorically had us up the backpassage while our pants were down please forgive the analogy.Given that the land the stadium stands on was useless,a delapidated eyesore,derelict for thirty years ,were we not the ultimate GOLDEN TICKET enabling the council the opporotunity to reinvent the entire area in the north of the city,creating 3000 new jobs .I know i will hear,whyshould they do anything for us,help us out,they have the ratepayers to consider etc etc,but when you consider what they have gained,at the very threat of our existance,surely being SKY BLUE cant allow us to accept that viewpoint.People would suggest,well you got yourself into this mess , true,we got there trying to benefit the city as well as the club.When we entered into the projected planwe were PREMIERSHIP,no account has been taken by the other party to acknowledge that factor . Instead they took land away from us .the cost of the actual stadium approached £58M,they appear to have put in£31M ,receiving £21m back over a fifty year lease @£500,000 pa with ACL running the show .What i want to know is ,should CCFC have been offered the option or were they? If not why not ?I personally don't believe the whole £250M scheme could have come to fruition without CCFC and the icon stadium ,and for that factor alone ithink we deserve some equity,theres a difference to being down and people talking you down and keeping you there. PUSB
Last edited: