You seem very agitated - whats wrong?
wouldnt they have to pay all the bills in the period of time that SISU (CCFC) use the stadium for football related things ? basically the same as at the wasp nest all be it at a cheaper rate?
No, we need revenue access.
You would have to assume that Sharp sees this as a as good, if not better, option or he wouldn't be open to the idea.
General consensus would seem to be that the fans would be behind it. If it can be shown to be the best option, to actually work then it gets a yes from me.
So over to Mr Fisher then ............... what are you going to do to drive it forward, and what is it you are actually asking us to back.............. what's the plan, lay it out and win the support, answer the questions properly with detail. If it is the future of our club test the Council resolve on it.
Put up or shut up
Similarly the Council, make Fisher/SISU put up or shut up, simply ask for the detail of the project and when the planning application can be expected. Test the SISU/Fisher commitment to it - they have the funding apparently so where is the issue?
General consensus would seem to be that the fans would be behind it. If it can be shown to be the best option, to actually work then it gets a yes from me.
So over to Mr Fisher then ............... what are you going to do to drive it forward, and what is it you are actually asking us to back.............. what's the plan, lay it out and win the support, answer the questions properly with detail. If it is the future of our club test the Council resolve on it.
Put up or shut up
Similarly the Council, make Fisher/SISU put up or shut up, simply ask for the detail of the project and when the planning application can be expected. Test the SISU/Fisher commitment to it - they have the funding apparently so where is the issue?
Mildenhall is still running but as I understand it there are still issues.Bollocks. Look at the court case the owners of Mildenhall stadium lost to newbies that moved into the area. It has basically bankrupted them and this was all about noise from the stadium from a house that are both in the flight path of RAF Mildenhall where military planes are allowed to take off twenty four seven 365.
I really can't see the butts happening. It's all very nice and pretty but it's smacks of look at this and not at this. Let's sell a dream about a city center lcoation and a new project and take the attention away from relegation, a shit team, no academy, selling ryton perhaps and homeless in a year. Take your pick. What is everyone now talking about? The butts. It's brilliant. Spout off about how crushed joy is and let the fans fight amongst themselves.
Tim fisher was a magician in a previous life. Misdirection. Actions speak louder than words and I've heard lots of talk and no action. Excuse me for being sceptical.
As old fiver has pointed out to you the planning permission is already in place.
Seem very agitated today Tony?
What level of planning approval does it have? You do realise there's more than one don't you? Does this approval include the right to play professional football at the site? Because if it doesn't (and I think we all know the answer to that one) from a CCFC perspective (unless the plan that you're salivating over despite not knowing the details includes becoming a non league team) are worthless because they don't include us. That means new plan's have to be submitted starting the process all over again which actually means that there isn't planning permission to build a 15k stadium on the site that we can play at.
Some questions for you as you're so clever. If there is planning permission for a 15k stadium why is everyone talking about 12k? Old fiver also insists that there are plans also drawn up for a 25k stadium at the site. If that's true why isn't there an outline application in for a 25k thus future proofing the site for future expansion if and when needed? Ate we really going to invest millions on building 12-15k stadium on the presumption that at some point in the future we can expand to 25k because someone can draw a picture of something and say that will work? As Ricky Gervais pointed out to people who claim that Leonardo da Vinci invented the helicopter drawing a picture of something and saying that will work is inventing nothing. Same goes with drawings of football stadium's or any major building project. There has to be a solution to make it happen.
What level of planning approval does it have? You do realise there's more than one don't you? Does this approval include the right to play professional football at the site? Because if it doesn't (and I think we all know the answer to that one) from a CCFC perspective (unless the plan that you're salivating over despite not knowing the details includes becoming a non league team) are worthless because they don't include us. That means new plan's have to be submitted starting the process all over again which actually means that there isn't planning permission to build a 15k stadium on the site that we can play at.
Some questions for you as you're so clever. If there is planning permission for a 15k stadium why is everyone talking about 12k? Old fiver also insists that there are plans also drawn up for a 25k stadium at the site. If that's true why isn't there an outline application in for a 25k thus future proofing the site for future expansion if and when needed? Ate we really going to invest millions on building 12-15k stadium on the presumption that at some point in the future we can expand to 25k because someone can draw a picture of something and say that will work? As Ricky Gervais pointed out to people who claim that Leonardo da Vinci invented the helicopter drawing a picture of something and saying that will work is inventing nothing. Same goes with drawings of football stadium's or any major building project. There has to be a solution to make it happen.
If you read between the lines of what Sharp said when announcing Cov Utd playing there that will stop if we move there.
Bears is in the summer so less of an issue, hasn't there been rumours of Wasps wanting them at the Ricoh?
Not really. Basic trigonometry will tell you that the stadium footprint will be the same regardless how deep you go.The stadium to get some extra capacity would have to be sunk below ground level.
.
Would still get 365 revenue wouldn't it?
Wasps' arrival means do something or die, I'd assume.
What happens to Jimmys statue,the garden of remembrance and my brick?
quite possibly NW.
Could it also mean the end to loaning of wasps players to CRFC? How important is that arrangement to Cov? I'll be honest, other than looking at their results I don't really follow them.
It's a stadium and premises, it doesn't need planning approval to play football there. Christ, you really are a simpleton. Wasps didn't need planning permission to move to the Ricoh for example.
Mildenhall is still running but as I understand it there are still issues.
It's a stadium and premises, it doesn't need planning approval to play football there. Christ, you really are a simpleton. Wasps didn't need planning permission to move to the Ricoh for example.
What level of planning approval does it have? You do realise there's more than one don't you? Does this approval include the right to play professional football at the site? Because if it doesn't (and I think we all know the answer to that one) from a CCFC perspective (unless the plan that you're salivating over despite not knowing the details includes becoming a non league team) are worthless because they don't include us. That means new plan's have to be submitted starting the process all over again which actually means that there isn't planning permission to build a 15k stadium on the site that we can play at.
Some questions for you as you're so clever. If there is planning permission for a 15k stadium why is everyone talking about 12k? Old fiver also insists that there are plans also drawn up for a 25k stadium at the site. If that's true why isn't there an outline application in for a 25k thus future proofing the site for future expansion if and when needed? Are we really going to invest millions on building 12-15k stadium on the presumption that at some point in the future we can expand to 25k because someone can draw a picture of something and say that will work? As Ricky Gervais pointed out to people who claim that Leonardo da Vinci invented the helicopter drawing a picture of something and saying that will work is inventing nothing. Same goes with drawings of football stadium's or any major building project. There has to be a solution to make it happen.
Am I right to assume all this will go tits up if SISU don't withdraw all legal claims ?It doesnt need planning permission to play professional football. I gave up reading your tripe after that.
Am I right to assume all this will go tits up if SISU don't withdraw all legal claims ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?