And thanks for reminding everyone about orange ken. Always good to remember the sort of dicks these people employ.
Yes all in the garden was rosy and SISU ruined it, your mummy was right!
imp:
Are SISU responsible for the reduced gates when the team on the pitch is better than its ever been?
or is it the sort of dicks that stay away and turn their backs on the team because their mummy told them SISU was bad!
Care to defend that?
ok I suppose you are just a wind up!
imp:
NO!
in this country innocent until proven guilty.
Define why YOU think SISU = Bad
Orange Ken sitting on the bench?
imp:
Lets focus on focus on the low gates thing.
Is that Sisus fault? No.
because if we can take 7000 to MK Dons we could take 7000 to Sixfields! - its closer!
Somebody dreamt up NOPM (THAT wasn't SISU) and now its sacrilegious for anybody to cross the Sixfields threshold.
Its every individuals decision to go or not to go, but its coloured by the common perception that its bad to go.
In an untainted world the gates would be higher because the football more than justifies that.
but this perception that SISU are bad and paying for a ticket at Sixfields is a NO-NO can't rely on the argument that SISU are bad because the gates are lower.
The gates are lower because people are staying away.
imp:
Innocent until proven guilty but you also say ACL are guilty :claping hands:
Lets focus on focus on the low gates thing.
Is that Sisus fault? No.
because if we can take 7000 to MK Dons we could take 7000 to Sixfields! - its closer!
Somebody dreamt up NOPM (THAT wasn't SISU) and now its sacrilegious for anybody to cross the Sixfields threshold.
Its every individuals decision to go or not to go, but its coloured by the common perception that its bad to go.
In an untainted world the gates would be higher because the football more than justifies that.
but this perception that SISU are bad and paying for a ticket at Sixfields is a NO-NO can't rely on the argument that SISU are bad because the gates are lower.
The gates are lower because people are staying away.
imp:
anyone who has been to sixfields IS a scab, they can never take it back. i could never look at myself in the mirror if i went.
Can I just ask, do you think its wrong for CCFC to be playing in Northampton? Because the likes of you, RFC, and trueskyblue, all seem to like us playing there. Because of that I have to question your loyalty to your city.
Can I just ask, do you think its wrong for CCFC to be playing in Northampton? Because the likes of you, RFC, and trueskyblue, all seem to like us playing there. Because of that I have to question your loyalty to your city.
Lets focus on focus on the low gates thing.
Is that Sisus fault? No.
because if we can take 7000 to MK Dons we could take 7000 to Sixfields! - its closer!
Somebody dreamt up NOPM (THAT wasn't SISU) and now its sacrilegious for anybody to cross the Sixfields threshold.
Its every individuals decision to go or not to go, but its coloured by the common perception that its bad to go.
In an untainted world the gates would be higher because the football more than justifies that.
but this perception that SISU are bad and paying for a ticket at Sixfields is a NO-NO can't rely on the argument that SISU are bad because the gates are lower.
The gates are lower because people are staying away.
imp:
Think that's more because you're dog ugly, mate.
No I don't think its "right" at all, we should be playing in the stadium that ccfc started to build for itself in Coventry.
Can I just ask you, do you really think SISU took us to Northampton because they wanted to?
imp:
And the gates are lower and people are staying away because of:thinking about::facepalm:
Yes exactly, people are staying away part of this is because there is an increased costs (both financially and travel time) of getting to 'home' matches and part to do with the fact that our club, Coventry City aren't playing these games in Coventry. Taking 7k to an away game is an excellent show that the support is still there, just not at home whilst we are in self imposed exile in Sixfields.Lets focus on focus on the low gates thing.
Is that Sisus fault? No.
because if we can take 7000 to MK Dons we could take 7000 to Sixfields! - its closer!
Somebody dreamt up NOPM (THAT wasn't SISU) and now its sacrilegious for anybody to cross the Sixfields threshold.
Its every individuals decision to go or not to go, but its coloured by the common perception that its bad to go.
In an untainted world the gates would be higher because the football more than justifies that.
but this perception that SISU are bad and paying for a ticket at Sixfields is a NO-NO can't rely on the argument that SISU are bad because the gates are lower.
The gates are lower because people are staying away.
imp:
rtfq
imp:
Are SISU responsible for the reduced gates when the team on the pitch is better than its ever been?
or is it the sort of dicks that stay away and turn their backs on the team because their mummy told them SISU was bad!
Care to defend that?
ok I suppose you are just a wind up!
imp:
Yes, they didn't have to take us to Northampton. We have a perfectly good ground in Coventry.
Fine Young Cannibals??
They wouldn't let us play there for less than £1.3mpa, they even sued us for the £1.3mpa after they had said £400k would have been reasonable.
How many now think the £1.3m was "right"?
imp:
No I don't think its "right" at all, we should be playing in the stadium that ccfc started to build for itself in Coventry.
Can I just ask you, do you really think SISU took us to Northampton because they wanted to?
imp:
The team is in the upper reaches of Division 3 on form, that is hardly "better than its ever been".
You are getting confused between the ability of the team and the relative enjoyment of watching a winning team in a lower league over a mediocre team in a higher division.
I have said before that the rent was too high, has anyone on here actually said it wasn't? Regarding other offers, are we back to Mr Labovitch and the infamous I can't hear you I'm not an Otium person today situation?They wouldn't let us play there for less than £1.3mpa, they even sued us for the £1.3mpa after they had said £400k would have been reasonable.
How many now think the £1.3m was "right"?
imp:
I have said before that the rent was too high, has anyone on here actually said it wasn't? Regarding other offers, are we back to Mr Labovitch and the infamous I can't hear you I'm not an Otium person today situation?
Plenty on here say we shouldn't have moved, we should have just paid the rent.
imp:
Have you ever heard of HOME GAMES, some clubs have but not in Fishers world. Wake Up.Lets focus on focus on the low gates thing.
Is that Sisus fault? No.
because if we can take 7000 to MK Dons we could take 7000 to Sixfields! - its closer!
Somebody dreamt up NOPM (THAT wasn't SISU) and now its sacrilegious for anybody to cross the Sixfields threshold.
Its every individuals decision to go or not to go, but its coloured by the common perception that its bad to go.
In an untainted world the gates would be higher because the football more than justifies that.
but this perception that SISU are bad and paying for a ticket at Sixfields is a NO-NO can't rely on the argument that SISU are bad because the gates are lower.
The gates are lower because people are staying away.
imp:
That would have made financial sense though wouldn't it?
Persuade me that moving to Northampton was better for the club than staying at the Ricoh and paying the rent.
Plenty on here say we shouldn't have moved, we should have just paid the rent.
imp:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?