The 72 "spending" table (1 Viewer)

Grendel

Well-Known Member
£38.2 million… the world’s gone mad!

it doesn’t show net spend. Burnley sold more than they spent and are a distortion anyway - if we had sold we would have spent

we did spend anyway on Palmer
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Judging by them using Transfermarkt then we spent £900k on Kasey Palmer....

We probably spent half a million
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Just going off what they were using for the figures.

They do make some whacky assumptions - I assume they’ve assumed we paid the contract difference for palmer but I’d think Bristol would have paid half of it
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
How have they worked out fees then if undisclosed?

Not sure, probably a lot of guesswork.

They've got Palmer wrong as they say he was a free transfer.

But was just pointing out that £900k isn't what they say we paid for him, it's their current value of him (also a lot of guesswork)
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Not sure, probably a lot of guesswork.

They've got Palmer wrong as they say he was a free transfer.

But was just pointing out that £900k isn't what they say we paid for him, it's their current value of him (also a lot of guesswork)

Technically he was.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
tbf all the reports at the time say undisclosed fee. It's fair to assume that was very small, and the main 'fee' would be taking over his contract but, who knows really!
Yes, he wasn't free. If we were taking on his contract (reportedly £20k pa at Bristol) you're looking at at least half a mil.
0bcd826a827ea3f015fe06735dc46cb0.jpg


Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Yes, he wasn't free. If we were taking on his contract (reportedly £20k pa at Bristol) you're looking at at least half a mil.
0bcd826a827ea3f015fe06735dc46cb0.jpg


Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

It’s semantics really rumour was he was free but wages paid at Brizzle rate for a year.
 

Cranfield Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
it doesn’t show net spend. Burnley sold more than they spent and are a distortion anyway - if we had sold we would have spent

we did spend anyway on Palmer
Not disputing that G. More are they that much better than us having spent that much? Better, yes but we competed in both games
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top