Those police vans can be very uncomfortable, i understand. Hope he doesn't come out with too many inexplicable bruises or broken bones!Hopefully they are ok and injuries aren't too bad.
Maybe the bloke who did it should vanish on the way to the station.
Who said it was a terror attack? It's just as likely related to the fact there isn't another World Mental Health Day today!
It has more of the hallmarks of a person having a mental episode.It's a question. It has the hallmarks of a terrorist attack, sounds indiscriminate.
It's a question. It has the hallmarks of a terrorist attack, sounds indiscriminate.
It has more of the hallmarks of a person having a mental episode.
Not too dissimilar in fairness.
Yes, not mutually exclusive by any stretch. You could probably argue that terrorists are mentally ill regardless.
Who said it was a terror attack? It's just as likely related to the fact there isn't another World Mental Health Day today!
The definition of terrorism includes the requirement that "the threat is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause", rather than just being someone with an axe to grind or is having some kind of episode. But, sure, the ideology they espouse may well have arisen from some kind of mental illness (voices in the head, etc).
Absolutely - that was the point i was trying to make, 92! I was going to put "Allah" but thought that might be jumping to conclusions!That covers religion surely? "God spoke to me"
It has more of the hallmarks of a person having a mental episode.
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
They also said in the same statement they dont know the reason for the attack. He was arrested on suspicion of terrorism during to.the nature of the attack not because they are sure it was terrorism. Let's not decide it's terrorism before the facts are out.Suspect re-arresed on suspicion of the commission, preparation and instigation of an act of terrorism. He is black (if that matters).
My apologies, i have seen a second photo of the incident with his face. I don't know why his leg is so pale if the face is genuineIf you look at the picture of him being detained, his left calf doesn't look very black to me. Does he identify as black, maybe???
There is a question mark in the thread titleThey also said in the same statement they dont know the reason for the attack. He was arrested on suspicion of terrorism during to.the nature of the attack not because they are sure it was terrorism. Let's not decide it's terrorism before the facts are out.
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
There is a question mark in the thread title
What a load of shit. As if you know the "hallmarks of a person having a mental episode" I would be interested to know what "hallmarks" you picked up on that convinced you this could not be an act of terrorism? Because, most people, looking at the minute by minute facts, would have said this had all the "hallmarks" of a terrorist attack given we have suffered identical attacks against the public in the past.It has more of the hallmarks of a person having a mental episode.
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
If you look at the picture of him being detained, his left calf doesn't look very black to me. Does he identify as black, maybe???
Can you post a pic of your calf?To be fair I'm mixed race myself but would you know that based on my profile photo? Doubt it.
In fairness the hallmarks are not mutually exclusiveWhat a load of shit. As if you know the "hallmarks of a person having a mental episode" I would be interested to know what "hallmarks" you picked up on that convinced you this could not be an act of terrorism? Because, most people, looking at the minute by minute facts, would have said this had all the "hallmarks" of a terrorist attack given we have suffered identical attacks against the public in the past.
What's the difference?It has more of the hallmarks of a person having a mental episode.
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Well as the person has now been detained under the mental health act and the GMP have said they haven't yet found any racial, religious or political motivation it's wrong to call it a terror attack.What a load of shit. As if you know the "hallmarks of a person having a mental episode" I would be interested to know what "hallmarks" you picked up on that convinced you this could not be an act of terrorism? Because, most people, looking at the minute by minute facts, would have said this had all the "hallmarks" of a terrorist attack given we have suffered identical attacks against the public in the past.
The reasoning behind itWhat's the difference?
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Did it create a sense of terror in Manchester? Were people in the local area who heard/seen/witnessed it scared for their own/other peoples lives?Well as the person has now been detained under the mental health act and the GMP have said they haven't yet found any racial, religious or political motivation it's wrong to call it a terror attack.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?