Who d you think he'll drop? I honestly can't see him dropping sheffers.
We could for instance sign moussa tommorew as its purely an extention ,but why not bring the window opening forward a day as the first is a fookin holiday ,or better still make the fatcats work like all the other unfortunates who have to,again better still scrap the stupid bloody stupid restrictive practice.:jerkit::jerkit:
He could say he learned from the PNE game and leaving Baker out.
Do you honestly think if baker started it would have changed that much? It was a scrappy poor game and Preston play poor football so even with baker it might not have changed much.
No, becuase the loan window is now closed.
Not assumption by him actually as we have to ask permission of the FA and if we hadn't of had him on loan it would defiantly be rejected.Yes it cannot be done LOL http://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/article/bailey-re-signs-on-loan-569253.aspx
Too much assumption on the Forum as per usual
I would keep the same team as MKDons. They were epic.
Bring Goldy on at HT if its not all going well simples!
Like we did v PNE with Baker? That went well... Play your best team, especially if they are on form, Bailey and McG are on form so both should start.
Arguably Elliot is on better scoring form than McG at the moment. Plus he's actually our player.
Bailey is different. Not his fault he was unavailable and is with us after this game.
Yes it cannot be done LOL http://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/article/bailey-re-signs-on-loan-569253.aspx
Too much assumption on the Forum as per usual
Elliot: 2 goals in his last game, McG: 1 goal in his last game. Can't compare beyond that as we're talking about form and Elliot's only played one recently.
It's not only arguable, it's a winnable argument.
Besides it's not the point. club before the man. McG got himself a silly booking and should have to work to get back in the side, top scorer, best ever player or owner of the club. That ethos is more important than anything that will happen tomorrow.
Give the guy an appearance on 50-60 mins if it's not going well, but we should not be small time enough to put one of Forest's reserve players above the wellbeing of our squad. Carl Baker had to drop to the bench after a silly booking and he's the captain, why should McG be any different?
Elliot: 2 goals in his last game, McG: 1 goal in his last game. Can't compare beyond that as we're talking about form and Elliot's only played one recently.
It's not only arguable, it's a winnable argument.
Besides it's not the point. club before the man. McG got himself a silly booking and should have to work to get back in the side, top scorer, best ever player or owner of the club. That ethos is more important than anything that will happen tomorrow.
Give the guy an appearance on 50-60 mins if it's not going well, but we should not be small time enough to put one of Forest's reserve players above the wellbeing of our squad. Carl Baker had to drop to the bench after a silly booking and he's the captain, why should McG be any different?
Just having a look through the Shrewsbury news and Charlton seem to think Clarke is available tomorrow... http://www.cafc.co.uk/news/article/20121231-mamboshrews-570329.aspx
Clarke is only here for 28 days?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?