A central midfielder has to deliver the killer pass , I don't think Jones has it in him . well not yet . :wacky:Think the general consensus is that Jones is too one footed to play on the wing and his end product is...lacking. I know there was a lot of hype around him from before he even broke into the daggers side, but I genuinely believe he can be a very good player for us for a long time but we'll need to adapt our tactics to incorporate him properly.
Surely he could offer more as a central attacking mid, especially as he is what you would class a luxury player. There he can pull the strings behind either a number nine or two forwards and just concentrate on creating space and running at the defence.
I'd hate to see him moved out of the club, a solid right sided midfielder who can get a cross in and a striker who can niggle defences and get his head on things.
but I genuinely believe he can be a very good player for us for a long time
crazy idea, I know, but go with this.......
play the left footed winger on the left wing ?
The other crazy idea is playing a left footer on the right wing as they can cut inside onto their stronger shooting foot, whilst attacking the defenders weaker side (in theory). Absolute bonkers I know.
The other crazy idea is playing a left footer on the right wing as they can cut inside onto their stronger shooting foot, whilst attacking the defenders weaker side (in theory). Absolute bonkers I know.
crazy idea, I know, but go with this.......
play the left footed winger on the left wing ?
I would rather play dev kelly evans on the left and spence on right or vice versa even bilal sayoud and george thomas on wing they have more technical ability than jones even long john silver can use both feet better than him. Thats why when the 30 scouts watched him they all walked away.
David Thompson?The other crazy idea is playing a left footer on the right wing as they can cut inside onto their stronger shooting foot, whilst attacking the defenders weaker side (in theory). Absolute bonkers I know.
The other crazy idea is playing a left footer on the right wing as they can cut inside onto their stronger shooting foot, whilst attacking the defenders weaker side (in theory). Absolute bonkers I know.
I thought he played with both feet, certainly seemed comfortable on both wings although played more on the left.Wasn't Tommy Hurchison naturally right footed but always insisted on playing on the left wing? I may be wrong - it's a long time ago.
Someone once said management is easy, pick your best eleven available and play to their strengths. It seems to me that too often we are ruining, yes ruining players in the UK by asking players to go against their strengths and do a job for the team.
IMO that is poor management as it it weakens the player, the team and the management in the long run. There are players who are versatile like James Milner but at our level they are few and far between.
Let Jones and all the players fit their talents in to the team, not the other way round. If he is good enough he will flourish but play him out of his position and he offers little and becomes very ineffective as we have seen. That goes for other players too, why waste our best striker as a winger?
Square pegs round holes.
crazy idea, I know, but go with this.......
play the left footed winger on the left wing ?
Yeah, but Jones is not an elite player like Mahrez. He's a kid in league one, we need to keep things simple.Have you watched Mahrez play, ever?
Wasn't Tommy Hurchison naturally right footed but always insisted on playing on the left wing? I may be wrong - it's a long time ago.
Yeah, but Jones is not an elite player like Mahrez. He's a kid in league one, we need to keep things simple.
My god mate, I think you might be onto something herecrazy idea, I know, but go with this.......
play the left footed winger on the left wing ?
You're comparing 2 completely different things. No ones saying you shouldn't play wingers on the opposite wings, but if they do they have to be able to go either way, if they cut in 100% of their time because they cant use their other foot means they become far too easy to defend against. Jones with his pace would be far more effective playing on the left where he can use his pace to get round the outside and get a decent early cross in. In open play these are usually more effective as they are early, meaning strikers are usually still on the move and defenders haven't managed go get back and are often still facing their own goal. If you're always cutting back to curl cross in, often strikers will have already made the run and are then left static and defenders have gotten back in position and facing away from goal. This is competely different from a corner in which everyone is pretty much static and its a planned routine.The theory is the same though, why do you think left footed players should play on the left hand side? What is the benefit? A left footed cross from the right hand side is far more dangerous because it is in-swinging and already heading in the direction of the goal.
Do you think all corners from the left should be taken by left footed players too?
Basically everything that Stupot said echoed my thoughts. You are right that the theory is the same. However the players aren't good enough to carry out the theory. Same as TM's 3 at the back at the start of the season. It's like telling our front 3 to go out and play like MSN. Simply not going to happen.The theory is the same though, why do you think left footed players should play on the left hand side? What is the benefit? A left footed cross from the right hand side is far more dangerous because it is in-swinging and already heading in the direction of the goal.
Do you think all corners from the left should be taken by left footed players too?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?