letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
who cares if we are not the biggest sports team in the city, will that detract from us supporting them?
As for sisu tinted glasses you know what I mean! don't make out your that stupid:facepalm:
How is that in in anyway written with 'sisu tinted glasses'.
I thought it was pretty obvious I meant sports team.
Sorry to distract from what we can all agree has been a very productive debate, by posting something on-topic.
Apologies if it’s already been raised by someone else, but I’ve noticed that a few days ago Rugby Borough Council published their proposed Local Plan for consultation:
https://www.rugby.gov.uk/downloads/file/893/local_plan_preferred_options_for_consultation
It’s 88 pages and I haven’t gone through it with a fine toothcomb, but shockingly there appears to be no mention of a stadium anywhere
However, on page 17 you’ll see that they’ve decided to take the assorted parcels of land around the M6 Junction 2, M69 and A46 out of the Green Belt. It says “The Submission Local Plan will consider as recommended by the JGBR the types of development acceptable in those locations to minimise the impact their removal would have on the remaining Green Belt”. That does leave the door open I think, and might (just might) have been prompted by representations from our esteemed chairman, who is good at building relationships.
This is a consultation document, so if you feel miffed that no site has been specifically set aside by Rugby Borough Council for Coventry’s football team, write in now and express your anger.
You beat me to it
C6 which is the area you are talking about is too small as it is cut into 3 sections by the M6 and A46.
It looks as though there is no stadium proposal for Rugby in the draft document.
Any comment Sisu ?
You beat me to it
C6 which is the area you are talking about is too small as it is cut into 3 sections by the M6 and A46.
It looks as though there is no stadium proposal for Rugby in the draft document.
Any comment Sisu ?
Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.
Looking at the map it looks like it's just infill of the road layout that links the M6, A46 & M69 which I would think due to access restrictions surely means that releasing it from greenbelt is a bit of a red herring whatever the development.
But you do not know what went on - you think he sold the rights to Highfield Road. :facepalm:
Yes I can see the difference.
You were merely making a point by playing on single word, when it clearly wasnt what I meant. That is also petty and small minded in my opinion, not in yours. Well done you.
I will maybe concede a "slightly pedantic clarification" but I can assure you it wasn't any sort of personal attack.
Can't we lighten up round here, it would be boring if everyone agreed with each other wouldn't it?
Sorry to distract from what we can all agree has been a very productive debate, by posting something on-topic.
Apologies if it’s already been raised by someone else, but I’ve noticed that a few days ago Rugby Borough Council published their proposed Local Plan for consultation:
https://www.rugby.gov.uk/downloads/file/893/local_plan_preferred_options_for_consultation
It’s 88 pages and I haven’t gone through it with a fine toothcomb, but shockingly there appears to be no mention of a stadium anywhere
However, on page 17 you’ll see that they’ve decided to take the assorted parcels of land around the M6 Junction 2, M69 and A46 out of the Green Belt. It says “The Submission Local Plan will consider as recommended by the JGBR the types of development acceptable in those locations to minimise the impact their removal would have on the remaining Green Belt”. That does leave the door open I think, and might (just might) have been prompted by representations from our esteemed chairman, who is good at building relationships.
This is a consultation document, so if you feel miffed that no site has been specifically set aside by Rugby Borough Council for Coventry’s football team, write in now and express your anger.
IMHO, that's spot on, and surely we can all agree with this statement, whoever we choose to blame.I think the Trust and fans are right to question what is going on with the new CCFC stadium and expect better answers than we have had so far.
I know many on here like to focus on the mistakes made by all involved in the past but the future seems to be fraught with a lot of problems and they could begin kicking in frighteningly soon
Took me a while to determine that JGBR stands for Joint Green Belt Review & not Jiangsu Lixing General Steel Ball Co., Ltd
Took me a while to determine that JGBR stands for Joint Green Belt Review & not Jiangsu Lixing General Steel Ball Co., Ltd
Ooh this thread's still going.
We are blessed.
Amen to thatIt will all be about the football come Sunday, and hopefully good too!
Done it for them.
Land is the Greenbelt release from RBC (Red)
Stadium is the same size as Ricoh.
Retail Park to the north and parking to the East.
View attachment 4910
CT rehash of discussions on this forum, but with additional feedback from RBC
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/no-new-coventry-city-fc-10595559
Cue assorted angry comments..
I really don't understand how people can't see through their agenda.
The problem is, for papers like the CT, a lot of their revenue will come from media advertising, predominantly on their website, which means every time they put a story on and we click on it we're just encouraging more of their bullshit.
Yes, I can't stop making deals with people to suppress news and conversationBit like this site then☺
Yes, I can't stop making deals with people to suppress news and conversation
I just bought a rolex from the income from your bullshit*
*this is a joke,pusb Will know it's a joke. Others may struggle with the concept, so just a confirmation.
CompletelySo the first bit is true?
Completelythey have stopped taking My bin because it's full of brown envelopes
The wife knows about it!!*Hope you declare it all
The wife knows about it!!*
* ps it is also another joke about getting paid lots of bungs, pps not for free either as that would be the first reply
I really don't understand how people can't see through their agenda.
The problem is, for papers like the CT, a lot of their revenue will come from media advertising, predominantly on their website, which means every time they put a story on and we click on it we're just encouraging more of their bullshit.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?