Summer transfer rumours (34 Viewers)

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
Rushworth has a year to go on his contract plus a years option so they have to sell or extend really and I doubt he'll sign on to be a number two.

Imo loads of signings rarely works. Keep the nucleus with some smart additions. A goalscorer is key

Worked for Nottingham Forest and Sunderland?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Fair enough bud. Firstly I was talking about what Doug King would be thinking. I’m actually not sure if I feel we should spend big or not. In terms of yo-yoing what I meant was in context of my previous message. He will have to essentially assess how much to spend that will give us a fighting chance to stay up, but also consider not to spend too much to leave us resilient enough if we were to get relegated to be able to go back up again - by ‘hoping to yo-yo’ I meant the being financially robust enough to go back up.

All theory of course, but I think those that think the squad will be completely revamped may be disappointed. King has referenced that the financial sustainability of the club is most important (quite rightly), so I don’t see massive upturn. Obviously I’m not him so could definitely be wrong.

Unless we really cock up recruitment I don’t see how we can have any issues from trying to stay up tbh. Parachute payments are there to cover wages and unless we sign total duds we should make a good chunk of any transfer fee investment back. Theres no cases of teams ruining themselves financially in the PL that’s a bit of a myth.
 

SkyblueTexan

Well-Known Member
Spurs seriously look like they will go down. Any players of theirs we could reasonably sign? Not suggesting we go for Madison per se, but just thinking out loud. Similarly wondering about players from Wolves and Burnley. Haven’t watched much of these teams.
 

jto123

Well-Known Member
Spurs seriously look like they will go down. Any players of theirs we could reasonably sign? Not suggesting we go for Madison per se, but just thinking out loud. Similarly wondering about players from Wolves and Burnley. Haven’t watched much of these teams.
Maddison is the one everyone will mention. I actually think he’s a great player, but just too injury prone.
 

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member
Maddison is the one everyone will mention. I actually think he’s a great player, but just too injury prone.

He would have to have a pay cut to come back home, loyalty comes at a cost. With most people money comes first.
 

ovduk78

Well-Known Member
Spurs seriously look like they will go down. Any players of theirs we could reasonably sign? Not suggesting we go for Madison per se, but just thinking out loud. Similarly wondering about players from Wolves and Burnley. Haven’t watched much of these teams.
No idea what they would cost but Bueno from Wolves at left back and Jaidon Anthony at Burnley would give us some pace and be a lot more direct 🤔
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
. Theres no cases of teams ruining themselves financially in the PL that’s a bit of a myth.
Not sure about that. Sunderland had that player in L1 on £60k a week s a result of being in the PL, that was crippling them financially. Spurs model ( due to cost owed on stadium) is built on premise of continuous European football. Relegation = ? Leeds went spiralling downwards, as their model was based on CL qualification, which led to them going t^ts up, and having to be sold to Ken Bates for £1, iirc?
 

skyblue025

Well-Known Member
Chilwell though a great player doesn’t have a great injury record and would be on massive money.
In his career he’s only played more than 27 league games once in a season. If given the choice of him or Robertson it would be the latter for me.
 

Balli001

Well-Known Member
Chilwell though a great player doesn’t have a great injury record and would be on massive money.
In his career he’s only played more than 27 league games once in a season. If given the choice of him or Robertson it would be the latter for me.
Well there won't be a choice as Robertson is going to spurs for probably triple what we could offer
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Not sure about that. Sunderland had that player in L1 on £60k a week s a result of being in the PL, that was crippling them financially. Spurs model ( due to cost owed on stadium) is built on premise of continuous European football. Relegation = ? Leeds went spiralling downwards, as their model was based on CL qualification, which led to them going t^ts up, and having to be sold to Ken Bates for £1, iirc?

None of these clubs disappeared or got in serious trouble. In fact all are current PL teams. Bad owners will fuck you at any level.
 

Mr.Chilled

Well-Known Member
Chilwell though a great player doesn’t have a great injury record and would be on massive money.
In his career he’s only played more than 27 league games once in a season. If given the choice of him or Robertson it would be the latter for me.
I doubt massive money, he's playing in a pub league at the moment. I think he could be signed for 8 million and on a 40k wage, possibly?
Good shout on his fitness, it seems to have improved recently though.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Chilwell though a great player doesn’t have a great injury record and would be on massive money.
In his career he’s only played more than 27 league games once in a season. If given the choice of him or Robertson it would be the latter for me.
Well given we have no chance of signing Robertson who is very much past it now no one will have to make that choice
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Chilwell doesnt feel like a King signing. No sell on value, injury prone, not the right age profile.
But what are King Premier League Signings? He knows he will also need to buy more experienced players as well if we want to make a fight of it.

He also signed Grimes who has not that much in sell on value, so he will buy older players if they are what we need.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top