I think it's more those slating those going to Sixfields accusing them of supporting 'covampton' franchise because of the temporary, but then went to MK Dons and gave money to a franchise club. That is a tad hypocritical.
Those who don't agree with the groundshare but still go to Sixfields are doing so because they want to support the lads. That's not hypocritical. We all do things we don't really want to do. Now of those people where encouraging people not to attend Sixfields but attended themselves I would class that as being hypocritical.
I agree not everyone is adopting NOPM, but the majority view is "in not going to Sixfields and giving shitsu my money" and quote NOPM. For those that spout that on here but then go to cup games are being hypocritical.
low attendance = low income, so of course NOPM will be a contributing factor if we end up having to sell in January.
Similarly not everyone is boycotting, some people just can't get there, whether because of distance or time.
Fair enough that is your decision, just don't have a go those that do (not accusing you), which is very divisive.
As side note - Oldham match (modest away following) there was about 30% of 2012/13 average, so not everyone is actively boycotting 100%.
In addition to the Sixfields attendees/boycotters, staunch NOPM/those that will give sisu money, there are also lots of other divisions though, where and portion blame lies, Thoughts on new stadium, ownership of the Ricoh, those that feel ccfc is already dead and want an AFC Coventry, etc.
And also thinking about it, how many unique visitors have their been at Sixfields? How many ST's are there? Are there a lot of regulars or is there a large number of fans that have just attended 1-2 games.
Sent from my iPhone using
Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors