It's no more impractical than making them work out injury time. For that they need to have one watch on continuously and another that they stop and start to work out injury time to add on.A few points on this matter.
Having a 60 minute stop clock system must not happen as it's clearly unpractical in all forms of the game. Hardly going to be done at Sunday League or even Conference standard.
Timewasting has become almost as bad for the image of the game as faking fowls. Wigan were absolutely terrible and took it in turns to just sit on the floor and feigning some injury.
Something has to be done and it seems that it has at this world cup. Officials playing 9 or 10 minutes injury time in both halfs seems to have eradicated time wasting. It's pretty boring have such long injury times played but its worked.
I suggest UK officials follow the same pattern. for those people who leave 5 or 10 minutes early in a match they would miss a massive portion of the game and might think twice in future about that. However people do need to know when a game is likely to finish though for planning their journey. For instance 1500 kickoff would normally finish at around 1650 to 1655 and could be 1700 or 1710! However as soon as managers know timewasting is literally a 'waste of time' under new system they wouldnt do it anymore.
Oops there's a further ten minutes lolI like the idea, but do wonder if the opposing team start doing everything they can to feign 'fouls' from challenges, particularly if the team is near the limit. May well work with VAR (sigh) who could check the validity of each yellow card decision - leading to a yellow for the other team trying to con the ref. E quite like the player having to go off for 10 minutes for a yellow (again, checked by VAR, to avoid incorrect decisions, or a yellow for the other player if they have dived etc.
At grass roots level this would be difficult to implement. It's hard enough getting referees already. To have this extra burden and chance of mistakes would deter amateur ref's. I remember in my playing days, the abuse they got . It would get maybe even worse if they got it perceived as wrong.It's no more impractical than making them work out injury time. For that they need to have one watch on continuously and another that they stop and start to work out injury time to add on.
Or they could just stop and start a stopwatch and see how much time's left.
At grass roots level this would be difficult to implement. It's hard enough getting referees already. To have this extra burden and chance of mistakes would deter amateur ref's. I remember in my playing days, the abuse they got . It would get maybe even worse if they got it perceived as wrong.
You’re missing the point. The game has never been a “90 minutes in play” game.Oops there's a further ten minutes lol
Anyway overall any talk of it being restricted to 60-70 minutes needs to stop.
That would be rewarding chelating.
They can FO, you're reducing a third of the game that you've been given to beat them
Whether it’s this or something else. Something needs to change
Yup and only allow the captain to approach the ref. No-one else.Officials need to grow some bollocks and start booking and then second booking for it. It would soon stop when teams are down to 9 because of it.
Yup and only allow the captain to approach the ref. No-one else.
That Hannibal of theirs yesterday, showed an incredible amount of dissent and should have been red carded.
Unless we're winning, of course! Football fans are so fickle.Whether it’s this or something else. Something needs to change
"Back to Old Trafford where the whole Manchester United team, bench and crowd have been shown the red card"Just need a general “being pricks” rule
Not from me and I dare say, many others too.Unless we're winning, of course! Football fans are so fickle.
It seems to be brilliant 'gamesmanship' when we do it, then throw the toys out if our opponents do it.
Unless we're winning, of course! Football fans are so fickle.
It seems to be brilliant 'gamesmanship' when we do it, then throw the toys out if our opponents do it.
No I don’t think even if we win. People pay a lot these days to only have the game on for a 55 minutes is ridiculous.Unless we're winning, of course! Football fans are so fickle.
It seems to be brilliant 'gamesmanship' when we do it, then throw the toys out if our opponents do it.
Yes that rule is coming in next seasonListening to CWR on my way home yesterday and Oggy said there are moves afoot to impose an 8 second limit on goalies holding the ball with a corner being given if they hold on too long. I think they tried something similar before and it was never properly enforced.
Was enlightening hearing Mark Clattenburg voicing that he felt the reason 6 seconds wasn’t enforced was that it was “too harsh”. Don’t give a fuck, mate. Can’t decide which rules to apply and which to ignore.
First home game we’ve lost in a long time and they start this nonsense again. How about the time we wasted setting up set pieces and long throws? The time we wasted trying to get Hannibal booked or the time Torp wasted crying on the floor for no reason.
Pathetic
This 8 second rule will be heavily enforced for about a month.
They also need to include goal kicks and go back to take it the side it goes out.
I originally thought a week but hoped they might show a bit of back boneThink a month is generous.
Won't make the slightest bit of difference adding 2 seconds onto the existing rule. Most hold it for longer than 8 seconds anyway.Listening to CWR on my way home yesterday and Oggy said there are moves afoot to impose an 8 second limit on goalies holding the ball with a corner being given if they hold on too long. I think they tried something similar before and it was never properly enforced.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?