Basically the new Money launderings regulations focus on how the due diligence on clients old or new is done. Rather than a simple proof of identity (passport etc) professionals additionally have to adopt a risk based assessment of the client and key personnel. Looking at it from the outside I do not see there would be any issues for SISU & Seppala even with their raised profile, I would think the same applies to any of the directors
Came in to force 22 June 2017
more details here Quick guide to the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 - The Law Society
So keep your eyes out then and see if anything seems to be going on this time
You can lift your eyebrows all your want, it's interesting how you say there are SISU employees (there probably is that are better at hiding it) but council employees are on here as cov fans.
It isn't just on here, it will be the media as well ramping things up a bit. I said it last week, it's already gone up a gear...
I will keep an eye out.
By the Cov fans comment I actually meant that you are likely to get council people in here as there will be Cov fans working for the council. I can't imagine many Cov fans work for SISU.
You never mentioned that I said PR people as well?
Yes I will carry on raising my eyebruws like I say having incorrectly been on the receiving end of your conspiracy theories I am quite sceptical
Well yes, there will be people on here who are employed by the council but are nothing to do with it. IE they work in a school or something. That's not really what is meant by it though if people say something along those lines
There will be people in here who work for the council higher up who are Cov fans as well, who will have different opinions to you.
There will also be a pr person or two from both sides I bet.
It's that person who will dip in and out.
However there won't be as many as you suspect. In my opinion.
If that 'helping them out' maximises my return I would absolutely continue to deal with them. That's a common occurrence in business and something I have done myself in the past. You put the legal matters to one side, which are generally being dealt with by lawyers anyway, and get on with running your business.As Chiefdave, if someone was repeatedly suing you despite them get advised by the judicial system to give up because their case was so weak.
They are causing you hassle time and money.
You have a legal duty to deal with them over certain matters. However they need you go well above and beyond that obligation and proactively help them out.
You are prepared to help but ask them to stop wasting your time and money with the pointless action. They refuse, would you help them above and beyond.
Also as chiefdave do you now wish that SISU drop the action
What about people involved using fake accounts?
If that 'helping them out' maximises my return I would absolutely continue to deal with them. That's a common occurrence in business and something I have done myself in the past. You put the legal matters to one side, which are generally being dealt with by lawyers anyway, and get on with running your business.
However is as you have assumed that company is losing me money (not sure how you've drawn the conclusion CCFC lose Wasps money) then I wouldn't deal with them if they were taking legal action or not.
Maybe that depends which of his accounts you're referring toWas PWKH on her as a fan for example or did he only create an account due to the problems?
I love it when the paranoia sets in.
So at tonight's game I should be chanting "OTIUM OUT!!!"?Not sure how many times it has to be explained. Legally Otium is a separate entity to SISU there is nothing at all that shows otherwise. What you are mistakenly taking as being the same entity is actually a description of being controlled by SISU in the decisions made. Like many companies not all decisions need to be passed to the "owners" for approval though.
It is a question of control not entity.
Perhaps if people used the right terms and descriptions there wouldn't be these perpetual misconceptions, pointless arguments and not challenging SISU on the real issues.
The reason it is important to get it right was highlighted with the administration of CCFC Ltd. That company formed part of the SBS&L group whose members are controlled by SISU exactly like Otium t/a CCFC is , had it been the same entity then SISU would have been in administration too, which of course it was not. That allowed SISU to take actions, for example to break the lease, that did not risk SISU Capital Limited - CCFC Ltd though controlled by SISU was expendable without affecting SISU existence as an entity. They made the decisions, controlled the process but were never the same entity.
Similarly Otium t/a CCFC is not the same entity any way you like to look at it. Otium is most definitely controlled by SISU though as was CCFC Ltd
Perhaps the worry should be that they are not the same entity, because of the options being separate brings
ps I have the qualifications that cover accounts, group structures and basic company law which some would say makes me an expert not an "expert" thanks
So at tonight's game I should be chanting "OTIUM OUT!!!"?
So at tonight's game I should be chanting "OTIUM OUT!!!"?
You could actually be pushing an agenda without even realising you are purely because you met up with SISU or the council, for example catching a train with them or going to select fan meetings and only hear their account of things and then you go away and spread that opinion.
Don't think it will be coincidence this is all starting up again when there could be pressure on Wasps to speak to the club about staying at the Ricoh. From what we are told by them, via the Telegraph, their stance is still a refusal to speak to the club yet we only have an agreement to play there until the end of the year.
Otium out of where you plum?
Something is going on in the background... Agendas are firing up.
If they were the same, CCFC wouldn't have a ticket office and offices at the Butts would they if he can't deal with SISU?
No-you should be chanting "Arvo" or Sky Blues Sports and Leasure Out!"So at tonight's game I should be chanting "OTIUM OUT!!!"?
How so? At present the only option in coventry is the Ricoh. That is controlled by Wasps and they have ended talks with the club and refused any further talks.The ball is clearly in CCFC's court and they are under time pressure.
Maybe it's a case of "Out, OUT - EVERYBODY OUT!!!"No-you should be chanting "Arvo" or Sky Blues Sports and Leasure Out!"
How so? At present the only option in coventry is the Ricoh. That is controlled by Wasps and they have ended talks with the club and refused any further talks.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?